It should be apparent from the title of this article that the author does not like the use of the word “photon”, which dates from 1926. In his view, there is no such thing as a photon. Only a comedy of errors and historical accidents led to its popularity among physicists and optical scientists. I admit that the word is short and convenient. Its use is also habit forming. Similarly, one might find it convenient to speak of the “aether” or “vacuum” to stand for empty space, even if no such thing existed. There are very good substitute words for “photon”, (e.g., “radiation” or “light”), and for “photonics” (e.g., “optics” or “quantum optics”). Similar objections are possible to use of the word “phonon”, which dates from 1932. Objects like electrons, neutrinos of finite rest mass, or helium atoms can, under suitable conditions, be considered to be particles, since their theories then have viable non-relativistic and non-quantum limits. This paper outlines the main features of the quantum theory of radiation and indicates how they can be used to treat problems in quantum optics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    The present paper is an expansion of material taken from overhead transparencies used in an Einstein Prize Lecture, “Anti-Photon”, given at a meeting of the Society of Quantum Optics and Electronics in Houston, TX, on December 7, 1992. The original form was published in:Proc. Int'l Conf. on Lasers' 92 (Society for Optical and Quantum Electronics, Alexandria, VA 1993) pp. 1–4

  2. 2.

    W.E. Lamb, Jr.: InThe Impact of Basic Research on Technology, ed. by B. Kursunoglu, A. Perlmutter (Plenum, New York 1973) pp. 59–111

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    J.G. Crowther: New Scientist and Science Journal (4 March, 1971) pp. 478–481

  4. 4.

    See [2] pp. 98–101

  5. 5.

    W.E. Lamb, Jr.: IEEE J. QE-20, 551 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    E.V. Appleton, B. van der Pol: Philos. Mag.42, 201 (1921)

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    See [2] pp. 77, 78, 80–85, 86–88

  8. 8.

    C.H. Townes, A.L. Schawlow:Microwave Spectroscopy (McGraw-Hill, New York 1955; Dover, New York 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    W.E. Lamb, Jr., M.O. Scully: In Polarization, Matiere et Rayonnement, Jubilee Volume in honor of Alfred Kastler (Presses Univ. France, Paris 1969) pp. 363–369

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    H. Fearn, W.E. Lamb, Jr.: Phys. Rev. A43, 2124 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    J.H. Hildebrand:Gilbert Newton Lewis, Biogr. Mem. Nat'l Acad. Sci.31, 210 (Columbia Univ. Press, New York 1958)

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    G.N. Lewis: Nature118, 874 (1926)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    G.N. Lewis, Phys. Rev.50, 857 (1936) G.N. Lewis, P.W. Schulz: Phys. Rev.51, 369 (1937) G.N. Lewis: Phys. Rev.51, 371 (1937) G.N. Lewis, P.W. Schulz: Phys. Rev.51, 1105 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    W.E. Lamb, Jr., L.I. Schiff: Phys. Rev.53, 651 (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    I.I. Rabi, W.W. Havens, L.J. Rainwater: Phys. Rev.72, 636 (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    E. Fermi, L. Marshall: Phys. Rev.72, 1139 (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    See [11] p. 235

  18. 18.

    W.E. Lamb, Jr.: Phys. Rev.55, 190 (1939). Reprinted inThe Mössbauer Effect, ed. by H. Frauenfelder (Benjamin, New York 1962) pp. 136–143

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    W. Heitler:Quantum Theory of Radiation (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 1944, 1954)

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    G. Feinberg:Lasers and Light, in Readings from the Scientific American, ed. by A.L. Shawlow (Freeman, San Francisco 1969) pp. 1–12. Similar opinions can be found in M. Gell-Mann:The Quark and the Jaquar, and S. Weinberg:Light as a fundamental particle, Phys. Today28, 32 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    M. Borenstein, W.E. Lamb, Jr.: Phys. Rev. A5, 1298 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    W.E. Lamb, Jr.: Phys. Rev.134, 1429 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    M.O. Scully, W.E. Lamb, Jr.: Phys. Rev.159, 208 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    R. Loudon:Quantum Optics, 1st edn., 2nd edn. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford 1973, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    M. Sargent, III, M.O. Scully, W.E. Lamb, Jr.:Laser Physics, 1st edn., 3rd edn. (Addison-Wesley Reading 1974, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Dupont-Roc, G. Grynberg:Photons and Atoms: Introduction to Quantum Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York 1989); also,Processus d'Interaction entre Photons et Atomes (Inter-editions, Paris 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    M.B. Spencer, W.E. Lamb, Jr.: Phys. Rev. A5, 884 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    M.O. Scully, R. Lang, W.E. Lamb, Jr.: Phys. Rev. A7, 1788 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    W.E. Lamb, Jr., L.N. Menegozzi: Phys. Rev. A8, 2103 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    R.J. Glauber: InQuantum Optics and Electronics, ed. by C. DeWitt, A. Blandin C. Cohen-Tannoudji (Gordon & Breach, New York 1965) pp. 63–185

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Additional information

It is a pleasure to join in the 60th birthday celebration of the Director, Herbert Walther, of the Max-Planck-Institute for Quantum Optics at Garching, and wish him much happiness and many more years of his very great scientific creativity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lamb, W.E. Anti-photon. Appl. Phys. B 60, 77–84 (1995).

Download citation


  • 12.20.-m
  • 42.50.-p