Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison of theJ* integral with other methods of post yield fracture mechanics

  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

TheJ * integral approach to post yield fracture analysis is compared with a wide variety of other methods by means of experimental testing of specimens invalid in the sense of ASTM. The significance of J* and its relationship to other integrals is discussed.

Résumé

En procédant à des essais expérimentaux d'éprouvettes non conformes suivant l'ASTM, on compare l'approcheJ intégrale pour analyser la rupture après écoulement plastique avec un large éventail d'autres méthodes. On discute la signification deJ et sa relation avec d'autres intégrales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.P. Harrison and I. Milne, inProceedings of Conference on Fracture Mechanics in Engineering Practice, P. Stanley (ed.), Applied Science Publishers (1977) 69–82.

  2. Rules for the Derivation of Acceptance Levels for Defects in Welded Joints, British Standard Institute, PD 6493 (1980).

  3. G.P. Cherepanov, PMM 25 (1967) 476–488.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.R. Rice,Journal of Applied Mechanics 34 (1968) 377–386.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W.S. Blackburn,International Journal of Fracture Mechanics 8 (1972) 343–346.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W.S. Blackburn, T.K. Hellen and A.D. Jackson,International Journal of Fracture 13 (1977) 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.D. Eshelby,Solid State Physics 3 (1956).

  8. J.R. Rice, inProceedings of 1st International Conference on Fracture, Sendai (1966) 309–340.

  9. W.S. Blackburn,International Journal of Fracture Mechanics 3 (1967) 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Yokobori,International Journal of Fracture Mechanics 4 (1968) 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Knowles and E. Sternberg,Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 44 (1972) 187–211.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Budiansky and J.R. Rice,Journal of Applied Mechanics 40 (1973) 201–203.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Bergez and D. Radenkovic,Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences (Paris) 275 (1972) 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  14. T.K. Hellen and W.S. Blackburn,International Journal of Fracture 11 (1975) 605–617.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H.D. Bui,Engineering Fracture Mechanics 6 (1974) 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K.B. Broberg, Calcit Report No. SM 76-9, Pasadena (1976).

  17. H. Bergkvist and G.-le Huong,International Journal of Fracture 13 (1977) RCR 556–558.

    Google Scholar 

  18. T.K. Hellen, “Finite Element Methods in Fracture Mechanics”. Ph.D. Thesis, London (1976).

  19. R.A. Ainsworth, B.K. Neale and R.H. Price, “Fracture Behaviour in the Presence of Thermal Strains” I. Mech. E. Conference on Defects in Pressure Vessels (1978).

  20. M.H. Gurtin,International Journal of Fracture 15 (1979) R169–R170.

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Kishimoto, S. Aoki and M. Sakata,Engineering Fracture Mechanics 15 (1980) 387–396.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.R. Rice,International Journal of Fracture 11 (1975) RCR 352–353.

    Google Scholar 

  23. F.A. McClintock, inFracture 3, H. Liebowitz (ed.), Academic Press (1971).

  24. K. Kishimoto, S. Aoki and M. Sakata,Engineering Fracture Mechanics 13 (1980) 841–850.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T.K. Hellen and W.S. Blackburn, “Use of a Path Independent Integral in Non Linear Fracture Mechanics”, Proceedings of 4th SMIRT Conference, San Francisco (1977).

  26. G.G. Chell and V. Vitek,International Journal of Fracture 13 (1977) RCR 882–886.

    Google Scholar 

  27. P.C. Paris and G.C. Sih,Stress Analysis of Cracks, ASTM STP 416 (1965).

  28. Methods of Test for Plane Strain Fracture Toughness (K IC) of Metallic Materials. British Standard BS 5447 (1977).

  29. F.J. Witt, “Equivalent Energy Procedures for Predicting Gross Plastic Fracture”, Fourth National Symposium on Fracture Mechanics (1970).

  30. B.K. Neale and C.H.A. Townley,International Journal of Piping and Pressure Vessels 5 (1977).

  31. G.T. Jones, “Post Yield Fracture Mechanics Analysis and Its Application to Turbo-generator Design”, 3rd International Conference on Fracture, Munich (1973).

  32. D.S. Dugdale,Journal of Mathematics and Physics of Solids 8 (1960) 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  33. P.T. Heald, G.M. Spink, and P.J. Worthington,Materials Science Engineering 10 (1972) 120–140.

    Google Scholar 

  34. G.G. Chell,Materials Science Engineering 17 (1974) 227–235.

    Google Scholar 

  35. G.G. Chell and A. Davidson,Materials Science Engineering 24 (1976) 45–72.

    Google Scholar 

  36. G.G. Chell and I. Milne,International Journal of Fracture 12 (1976) R164–166.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J.C. Newman, inASTM STP 605 (1976) 104–123.

    Google Scholar 

  38. A.R. Dowling and C.H.A. Townley,International Journal of Piping and Pressure Vessels (1975) 77–104.

  39. I. Milne and G.C. Chell, inElastic Plastic Fracture, ASTM STP 668 (1979).

  40. T.K. Hellen and S.J. Protheroe,Computer Aided Design 6 (1974) 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  41. T.K. Hellen, “A Numerical Comparison of Post Yield Fracture in Rotor Steels”, Second International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fracture Mechanics, Swansea (1980).

  42. J.A. Begley and J.D. Landes, inASTM STP 514 (1972) 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  43. J.A. Begley and J.D. Landes, inASTM STP 536 (1973) 246–263.

    Google Scholar 

  44. J.N. Robinson and A.S. Tetelman,Engineering Fracture Mechanics 8 (1976) 301–313.

    Google Scholar 

  45. C. Buchalet and T.R. Mager, inASTM STP 536 (1973) 281–296.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. W. S. Blackburn & A. D. Jackson

    Present address: C.E.G.B., UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. NEI Parsons Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    A. D. Batte & A. Elsender

  2. NEI Parsons Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    W. S. Blackburn & A. D. Jackson

  3. C.E.G.B., Berkeley, Gloucestershire, UK

    T. K. Hellen

Authors
  1. A. D. Batte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. S. Blackburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Elsender
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. K. Hellen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. D. Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Batte, A.D., Blackburn, W.S., Elsender, A. et al. A comparison of theJ* integral with other methods of post yield fracture mechanics. Int J Fract 21, 49–66 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01134199

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01134199

Keywords

Search

Navigation