Summary
We first review the theoretical and computer modelling studies concerning localization accuracy of EEG and MEG, both separately and together; the source is here a dipole. The results show that, of the three causes of localization errors, noise and head modelling errors have about the same effect on EEG and MEG localization accuracies, while the results for measurement placement errors are inconclusive. Thus, these results to date show no significant superiority of MEG over EEG localization accuracy. Secondly, we review the experimental findings, where there are again localization accuracy studies of EEG and MEG both separately and together. The most significant EEG-only study was due to dipoles implanted in the heads of patients, and produced an average localization error of 20 mm. Various MEG-only studies gave an average error of 2–3 mm in saline spheres and 4–8 mm in saline-filled skulls. In the one study where EEG and MEG localization were directly compared in the same actual head, again using dipoles implanted in patients, the average EEG and MEG errors of localization were 10 and 8 mm respectively. The MEG error was later confirmed by a similar (but MEG-only) experiment in another study, using a more elaborate MEG system. In summary, both theory and experiment suggests that the MEG offers no significant advantage over the EEG in the task of localizing a dipole source. The main use of the MEG, therefore, should be based on the proven feature that the MEG signal from a radial source is highly suppressed, allowing it to complement the EEG in selecting between competing source configurations. A secondary useful feature is that it handles source modelling errors differently than does the EEG, allowing it to help clarify non-dipolar extended sources.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ary, J.P., Klien, S.A., and Fender. D.K. Location of sources of scalp evoked potentials: Corrections for skull and scalp thickness. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 1981, BME-28:447–452.
Balish, M., Sato, S., Connaughton, P., Kufta, C. Localization of implanted dipoles by magnetoencephalography. Neurology, 1991, 41:1072–1076.
Barth D., Beatty J., Broffman J., Sutherling W. Magnetic localization of a dipolar current source implanted in a sphere and a human cranium. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1986, 63:260–273.
Baule G, and McFee R. Theory of magnetic detection of the heart's electrical activity. J. Appl. Physics, 1965, 36:2066–2073.
Cohen, D., and Cuffin, B.N. Demonstration of useful differences between MEG and EEG. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1983; 56:38–51.
Cohen, D., Cuffin, B.N., Yunokuchi, K., Maniewski R., Purcell, C., Cosgrove, G.R., Ives, J., Kennedy, J.G., and Schomer, D.L. MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain. Ann. Neurol., 1990, 28:811–817.
Cuffin, B.N. A comparison of moving dipole inverse solutions using EEG' and MEG's. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 1985a, BME 32:905–910.
Cuffin, B.N. Effects of fissures in the brain on electroencephalograms and magnetoencephalograms. J. Appl. Phys., 1985b, 57:146–153.
Cuffin, B.N. Effects of measurement errors and noise on MEG moving dipole inverse solutions. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 1986 BME-33:854–861.
Cuffin, B.N. Effects of head shape on EEG's and MEG's. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 1990, BME-37:44–52.
Cuffin, B.N. Eccentric sphere models of the head. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., BME-38, 1991a, in press.
Cuffin, B.N. Effects of local variations in skull and scalp thickness on EEG's and MEG's. Submitted to IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 1991b.
Cuffin, B.N. and Cohen, D. Comparison of the magnetoencephalogram and electroencephalogram. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1979, 47:132–146.
Darcey, T.M., Ary, J.P., and Fender, D.H. Methods for the localization of electrical sources in the human brain. In: Kornhuber, H.H. and Deeke, L. (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research. Vol. 54, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1980:128–134.
Gaumond, R.P., Lin, J.H., and Geselowitz, D.B. Accuracy of dipole localization with a spherical homogeneous model. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 1983, BME-30:29–34.
Hamalainen, M.S. and Sarvas, J. Feasibility of the homogeneous head model in the interpretation of neuromagnetic fields. Phys. Med Biol., 1987, 32:91–97.
Hansen, J.S., Ko, H.W., Fisher, R.S., and Litt,B. Practical limits on the biomagnetic inverse process determined from in vitro measurements in spherical conducting volumes. Phys. Med. Biol., 1988, 33:105–111.
Hari, R., Joutsiniemi, S.L., and Sarvas, J. Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: Theoretical calculations in a spherical model. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., 1988, 71:64–72.
Hari, R., Lounasmaa O.V. Recording and interpretation of cerebral magnetic fields. Science 1989, 244:432–436.
He, B., Musha, T., Okamoto, Y., Homma, S., Nakajima, Y., and Sato, T. Electric dipole tracing in the brain by means of the boundary element method and its accuracy. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 1987, BME-34:406–414.
Henderson, C.J., Butler, S.R., Glass A. The localization of the equivalent dipoles of EEG sources by the application of electric field theory. Electroencephalogr. clin. Neurophysiol., 1975, 39:117–130.
Janday, B.S. and Swithenby, S.J. Analysis of magnetoencephalographic data using the homogeneous sphere model: empirical tests. Phys. Med. Biol., 1987, 32:105–113.
Kavanagh, R.N., Darcey, T.M., Lehmann, D., and Fender, D.H. Evaluation of methods for three-dimensional localization of electrical sources in the human brain. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 1978, BME-25:421–429.
Meijs, J.W.H., ten Voode, B.J., Peters, M.J., Stok, C.J., and Lopes da Silva, F.H. The influence of various head models on EEG's and MEG's. In: Pfurtscheller, G. and Lopes da Silva, F.H. (Eds.), Functional Brain Imaging. Huber, Toronto, 1988:31–46.
Melcher, J. and Cohen D. Dependence of the MEG on dipole orientation in the rabbit head. Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol. 1988, 70:460–472.
Okada, Y. Discrimination of localized and distributed current dipole sources and localized single and multiple sources. In: Weinberg, H., Stroink, G., and Katila, T. (Eds.), Biomagnetism: Applications and Theory. Pergamon Press, New York, 1985:266–272.
Smith D.B., Sidman R.D., Flanigin H, Henke J, and Labiner D. A reliable method for localizing deep intracranial sources of the EEG. Neurology, 1985a, 35:1702–1707.
Smith D.B., Sidman R.D., Henke, J.S., et al. Scalp and depth recording of induced deep cerebral potentials. Electroencephalogr. clin. Neurophysiol., 1985b, 55:145–150.
Stok, C.J. The influence of model parameters on EEG/MEG single dipole source estimation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Engr., 1987, BME-34:289–296.
Weinberg H., Brickett P., Coolsma F., and Baff M. Magnetic localization of intracranial dipoles: simulation with a physical model. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol. 1986, 64:159–170.
Wood, C.C., Cohen, D., Cuffin, B.N., Yarita, M., and Allison, T. Electrical sources in human somatosensory cortex: identification by combined magnetic and potential recordings. Science. 1985, 227:1051–1053.
Yamamoto T., Williamson S.J., Kaufman L., Nicholson C., and Llinas R. Magnetic Localization of neuronal activity in the human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1988, 85:8732–8736.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported by grants RO1NS26433, RO1NS19558 and RO1NS22703 from the National Institutes of Health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, D., Cuffin, B.N. EEG versus MEG localization accuracy: Theory and experiment. Brain Topogr 4, 95–103 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132766
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01132766