Skip to main content
Log in

Psychological determinism and rationality

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are arguments which purport to rebut psychological determinism by appealing to its alleged incompatibility with rationality. I argue that they all fail. Against Davidson, I argue that rationality does not preclude the existence of psychological laws. Against Popper, I argue that rationality is compatible with the possibility of predicting human actions. Against Schlesinger, I claim that Newcomb's problem cannot be invoked to show that human actions are unpredictable. Having vindicated the possibility of a rationally-based theory of action, I consider the form it might take.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar-Hillel, M. and Margalit, A.: 1972, ‘Newcomb's Problem Revisited’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23, 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1970, ‘Mental Events’, in D. Davidson (ed.),Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1973, ‘The Material Mind’, in D. Davidson (ed.),Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1974, ‘Psychology as Philosophy’, in D. Davidson (ed.),Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1985. ‘Donald Davidson Responds’, in B. Vermazen and M. B. Hintikka (eds.),Essays on Davidson: Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eells, E.: 1982,Rational Decision and Causality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, A. and Harper, W. L.: 1978, ‘Counterfactuals and Two Kinds of Expected Utilities’, in W. Harper, R. Stalnaker and G. Pearce (eds.),Iffs: Conditionals, Belief, Decision, Chance and Time, Reidel, Boston, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, T.: 1981, ‘Counterfactuals and Newcomb's Problem’,Journal of Philosophy 78, 331–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: 1739,A Treatise of Human Nature (2nd edition), L. A. Selby-Bigge (ed.). Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.: 1985, ‘Psychophysical Laws’, in E. LePore and B. McLaughlin (eds.),Actions and Events, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: 1981, ‘Causal Decision Theory’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59, 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. G.: 1988,Judgement and Justification, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C.: 1978, ‘Mental States, Natural Kinds and Psychophysical Laws’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary volume 102, pp. 195–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R.: 1969, ‘Newcomb's Problem and Two Principles of Choice’, in N. Rescher (ed.),Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1957,The Poverty of Historicism, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1982,The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, G.: 1974, ‘The Unpredictability of Free Choices’,The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A.: 1954, ‘Bandwagon and Underdog Effects of Election Predictions’,Public Opinion Quarterly 18, 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1974, ‘Freedom and Resentment’, inFreedom and Resentment and Other Essays, Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Damme, E.: 1983,Refinements af the Nash Equilibrium Concept, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weintraub, R. Psychological determinism and rationality. Erkenntnis 43, 67–79 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131840

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01131840

Keywords

Navigation