Skip to main content
Log in

Evidence for multiple generators in evoked responses using finite difference field mapping: Auditory evoked fields

  • Published:
Brain Topography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Electric potential maps and magnetic field maps have been used to study brain electrical activity. During the temporal course of an evoked cortical response, the electrical activity of specific neuronal subpopulations change in a sequential manner giving rise to measurable electrical potentials and magnetic fields. For these potentials and fields, both the amplitude and rate of amplitude change have characteristic, time-dependent waveforms. Presently, amplitude waveforms from multiple locations are used to generate magnetic field and electric potential maps which have been found to be useful in understanding the activity of the neurons which give rise to these maps (Romani 1990). This paper introduces a data transformation technique which results in a derived map that we have termed a "finite difference field map" (FDFM). This mapping technique provides information associated with the rate at which the amplitude of the neuronal electric activity changes. In this paper, some advantages of FDFM analysis are illustrated by application of this technique to the study of the auditory evoked cortical field (AECF) N1m waveform. Using data obtained from normal subjects it will be demonstrated that application of the FDFM technique allows the localization of the primary N1m source at an earlier latency than is possible using the conventional waveform data. The source location determined at an early latency by FDFM analysis was identical to that obtained at later latency from the conventional field data. These data suggest that the primary N1m source is stationary. In addition, analysis of the time sequence of FDFM field maps contains evidence of a second spatially separate source which is co-active with primary N1m source.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barth, D.S., Sutherling, W., Broffman, J. and Beatty, J. Magnetic localization of a dipolar current source implanted in a sphere and a human cranium. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 63: 260–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elberling, E., Bak, C., Kofoed, B., Lebech, J. and Soermark, K. Auditory magnetic fields. Scan. Audiol., 1982, 11: 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hari, R. The neuromagnetic method in the study of the human auditory cortex. In: F. Grandori, M. Hoke and G.L. Roman (Eds.), Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Adv. Audiology, Basel, Karger, 1990, 6: 222–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoke, M., Feldman, H., Pantev, C., Lutkenhoner, B. and Lehnertz, K. Objective evidence of tinnitus in auditory evoked magnetic fields. Hearing Res., 1989, 37: 281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, G.P., Ahmad, B.K., Moran, J., Newman, C.W., Tepley, N. and Wharton, J. Auditory evoked cortical magnetic field (M100–M200) measurements in tinnitus and normal groups. Hearing Research 1991, 51: 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaukoranta, E., Hamalainen, M., Sarvas, J. and Hari, R. Mixed sensory nerve stimulations activate different cytoarchitectonic areas at the human primary somatosensory cortex SI. Neuromagnetic recordings and statistical considerations. Exp. Brain Res., 1986, 63: 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lypchuk, T. BTI Report: Dipole fit algorithms for MEG analysis. Biomagnetic Technologies, 1990: 10–12.

  • Nunez, P. The brain's magnetic field: Some effects of multiple sources on localization methods. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 63: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield, R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychol, 1971, 9: 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantev, C., Lutkenhoner, B., Hoke, M. and Lehnertz, K. Comparison between simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked magnetic fields and potentials elicited by ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural tone burst stimulation. Audiology, 1986, 25: 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peronnet, F., Giard, M-H., Bertrand, O. and Pernier J. The temporal component of the auditory evoked potential: A reinterpretation. Electroenceph. Clin Neurophysiol., 1984, 59: 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R.L., Papanicolaou, A.C., Baumann, S.B., Saydjari, C. and Eisenberg, H.M. Neuromagnetic evidence of a dynamic excitation pattern generating the N100 auditory response. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1990, 77: 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romani, G.L. and Pizzella, V. Localization of brain activity with magnetoencephalography. Raven Press, New York, 1990: 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherg, M. and von Cramon, D. Two bilateral sources of the late AEF as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. Electroenceph. clin Neurophysiol., 1985, 62: 32–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherg, M. and von Cramon, D. Evoked dipole source potentials of the human auditory cortex. Electronenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1986, 65: 344–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpaw, J.R. and Penry, J.K. A temporal component of the auditory evoked response. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1975, 39: 609–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, C.C. and Wolpaw, J.R. Scalp distribution of human auditory evoked potentials. II. Evidence for overlapping sources and involvement of auditory cortex. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1982, 54: 25–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moran, J.E., Tepley, N., Jacobson, G.P. et al. Evidence for multiple generators in evoked responses using finite difference field mapping: Auditory evoked fields. Brain Topogr 5, 229–240 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128990

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128990

Key words

Navigation