Abstract
The philosophical debate whether the epistemological and conceptual structure of science is better characterized as hierarchical or as holistic cannot be decideda priori. A case study on general relativity should help to clarify our representation of this section of physics. For this purpose Sneed's model-theoretic approach is used to reconstruct the structure of relativity. The proposed axiomatization of general relativity takes into account approximations and utilizes “local models” for a realistic view on the functioning of the theory. A central objective of the paper is to give an explication of the “approximative empirical claim” of general relativity, which is designed to identify the empirical content of the theory in a weak hierarchical form.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balzer, W. and C. U. Moulines: 1980, ‘On Theoreticity’,Synthese 44, 467–494.
Balzer, W. and C. U. Moulines: 1981, ‘Die Grundstruktur der klassischen Partikelmechanik und ihre Spezialisierungen’,Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 36a, 600–608.
Balzer, W., C. U. Moulines and J. D. Sneed: 1988,An Architectonic for Science, Reidel: Dordrecht.
Bartelborth, T.: 1988,Eine logische Rekonstruktion der klassischen Elektrodynamik, Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M.
Bartelborth, T.: 1989, ‘Kann es rational sein, eine inkonsistente Theorie zu akzeptieren?’,Philosophia Naturalis 26, 91–120.
Beem, J. K. and P. E. Ehrlich: 1981,Global Lorentzian Geometry, Dekker, New York.
Carnap, R.: 1966,Philosophical Foundations of Physics, Basic Books, New York.
Carrier, M.: 1990, ‘Constructing or Completing Physical Geometry?’,Philosophy of Science 57, 369–394.
Dixon, W. G.: 1978,Special Relativity, Cambridge University Press.
Forge, J.: 1984, ‘Theoretical Functions, Theory and Evidence’,Philosophy of Science 51, 443–463.
Fraassen, v. B.: 1980,The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Fraassen, v. B.: 1989,Laws and Symmetry, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Fraassen, v. B.: 1991,Quantum Mechanics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Friedman, M.: 1983,Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton University Press.
Gähde, U.: 1980, ‘Eine physikalische Randbemerkung zum Operationalismus P. W. Bridgemans: Temperaturmessung in der Astronomie’, Manuskript DFG Projekt BA 678/1, 1980.
Gähde, U.: 1983,T-Theoretizität und Holismus, Lang Verlag, Frankfurt a.M.
Gähde, U.: 1989,Theorie und Hypothese, Habilitationsschrift Bielefeld.
Gähde, U.: 1990, ‘On Innertheoretical Conditions for Theoretical Terms’,Erkenntnis 32, 215–233.
de Groot, S. R. and L. G. Suttorp: 1972,Foundations of Electrodynamics, North-Holland Publ. Co, Amsterdam.
Hawking, S. W. and G. F. R. Ellis: 1973,The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D.: 1970, ‘How to Define Theoretical Terms’,The Journal of Philosophy 67, 427–446.
Ludwig, G.: 1978,Einführung in die Grundlagen der theoretischen Physik. Bd. 1, Vieweg: Braunschweig.
Mackinnon, E.: 1979, ‘Scientific Realism: The New Debates’,Philosophy of Science 46, 502–532.
Maugin, G. A.: 1978, ‘On the Covariant Equations of the Relativistic Electrodynamics of Continua. I. General Equations II. Fluids’,Journal of Mathematical Physics 19, 1198–1211.
Moulines, C. U.: 1975, ‘A Logical Reconstruction of Simple Equilibrium Thermodynamics’,Erkenntnis 9, 101–130.
Moulines, C. U.: 1981, ‘A General Scheme for Intertheoretic Approximation’, in: A. Hartkämper, H.-J. Schmidt (eds.),Structure and Approximation in Physical Theory, Plenum Press, New York.
Moulines, C. U.: 1984, ‘Links, Loops, and the Global Structure of Science’,Philosophia Naturalis 21, 254–265.
Moulines, C. U.: 1986, ‘The Ways of Holism’,Nous 20, 313–330.
Mühlhölzer, F.: 1989,Objektivität und Erkenntnisfortschritt, Habilitationsschrift München.
Penfield, P. and H. A. Haus: 1967,Electrodynamics of Moving Media, MIT Press.
Ramsey, F. P.: 1931, ‘Theories’, in:The Foundations of Mathematics, Routledge and Kegal Paul, London.
Sneed, Joseph D.: 1971,The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Schmidt, H. J.: 1979,Axiomatic Construction of Physical Geometry, Springer, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I wish to thank John Forge, Ulises Moulines, Ulrich Gähde and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bartelborth, T. Hierarchy versus holism: A structuralist view on general relativity. Erkenntnis 39, 383–412 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128509
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128509