Skip to main content
Log in

Hierarchy versus holism: A structuralist view on general relativity

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The philosophical debate whether the epistemological and conceptual structure of science is better characterized as hierarchical or as holistic cannot be decideda priori. A case study on general relativity should help to clarify our representation of this section of physics. For this purpose Sneed's model-theoretic approach is used to reconstruct the structure of relativity. The proposed axiomatization of general relativity takes into account approximations and utilizes “local models” for a realistic view on the functioning of the theory. A central objective of the paper is to give an explication of the “approximative empirical claim” of general relativity, which is designed to identify the empirical content of the theory in a weak hierarchical form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balzer, W. and C. U. Moulines: 1980, ‘On Theoreticity’,Synthese 44, 467–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W. and C. U. Moulines: 1981, ‘Die Grundstruktur der klassischen Partikelmechanik und ihre Spezialisierungen’,Zeitschrift für Naturforschung 36a, 600–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzer, W., C. U. Moulines and J. D. Sneed: 1988,An Architectonic for Science, Reidel: Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelborth, T.: 1988,Eine logische Rekonstruktion der klassischen Elektrodynamik, Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartelborth, T.: 1989, ‘Kann es rational sein, eine inkonsistente Theorie zu akzeptieren?’,Philosophia Naturalis 26, 91–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beem, J. K. and P. E. Ehrlich: 1981,Global Lorentzian Geometry, Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1966,Philosophical Foundations of Physics, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrier, M.: 1990, ‘Constructing or Completing Physical Geometry?’,Philosophy of Science 57, 369–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W. G.: 1978,Special Relativity, Cambridge University Press.

  • Forge, J.: 1984, ‘Theoretical Functions, Theory and Evidence’,Philosophy of Science 51, 443–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, v. B.: 1980,The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, v. B.: 1989,Laws and Symmetry, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraassen, v. B.: 1991,Quantum Mechanics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M.: 1983,Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Princeton University Press.

  • Gähde, U.: 1980, ‘Eine physikalische Randbemerkung zum Operationalismus P. W. Bridgemans: Temperaturmessung in der Astronomie’, Manuskript DFG Projekt BA 678/1, 1980.

  • Gähde, U.: 1983,T-Theoretizität und Holismus, Lang Verlag, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gähde, U.: 1989,Theorie und Hypothese, Habilitationsschrift Bielefeld.

  • Gähde, U.: 1990, ‘On Innertheoretical Conditions for Theoretical Terms’,Erkenntnis 32, 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Groot, S. R. and L. G. Suttorp: 1972,Foundations of Electrodynamics, North-Holland Publ. Co, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S. W. and G. F. R. Ellis: 1973,The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time, Cambridge University Press.

  • Lewis, D.: 1970, ‘How to Define Theoretical Terms’,The Journal of Philosophy 67, 427–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, G.: 1978,Einführung in die Grundlagen der theoretischen Physik. Bd. 1, Vieweg: Braunschweig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, E.: 1979, ‘Scientific Realism: The New Debates’,Philosophy of Science 46, 502–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maugin, G. A.: 1978, ‘On the Covariant Equations of the Relativistic Electrodynamics of Continua. I. General Equations II. Fluids’,Journal of Mathematical Physics 19, 1198–1211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulines, C. U.: 1975, ‘A Logical Reconstruction of Simple Equilibrium Thermodynamics’,Erkenntnis 9, 101–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulines, C. U.: 1981, ‘A General Scheme for Intertheoretic Approximation’, in: A. Hartkämper, H.-J. Schmidt (eds.),Structure and Approximation in Physical Theory, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulines, C. U.: 1984, ‘Links, Loops, and the Global Structure of Science’,Philosophia Naturalis 21, 254–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulines, C. U.: 1986, ‘The Ways of Holism’,Nous 20, 313–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mühlhölzer, F.: 1989,Objektivität und Erkenntnisfortschritt, Habilitationsschrift München.

  • Penfield, P. and H. A. Haus: 1967,Electrodynamics of Moving Media, MIT Press.

  • Ramsey, F. P.: 1931, ‘Theories’, in:The Foundations of Mathematics, Routledge and Kegal Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneed, Joseph D.: 1971,The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, H. J.: 1979,Axiomatic Construction of Physical Geometry, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I wish to thank John Forge, Ulises Moulines, Ulrich Gähde and an anonymous referee for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bartelborth, T. Hierarchy versus holism: A structuralist view on general relativity. Erkenntnis 39, 383–412 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128509

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128509

Keywords

Navigation