Abstract
A widely held view about Fregean Sense has it that the determination of a sign's referent by the sign's sense is achieved viasatisfaction: the sense specifies a condition (or set of conditions) and the referent is that entity, if any, which uniquely satisfies that (set of) condition(s). This is usually held in conjunction with the claim that the sense is existentially and qualitatively independent of the referent: if the referent did not exist, or did not uniquely satisfy the sense, the sense would still exist and would still specify the same condition(s) that it actually does (and might determine a different referent than its actual one). Proponents of this view give several reasons for holding it. I describe these reasons and argue that they are not convincing. More generally, I try to show that the notion of satisfaction has no useful application within Frege's system. I then suggest an alternative account of the determination of a referent by a sense that I think is truer to Frege and more illuminating. Compared to the satisfaction view, my account construes determination as a more naturalistic and epistemically real relation between speakers and things in the world.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anscombe, G. and P. Geach: 1961,Three Philosophers, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Burge, T.: 1977, ‘BeliefDe Re’,The Journal of Philosophy 74, 338–362.
Burge, T.: 1979, ‘Sinning Against Frege’,The Philosophical Review 88, 398–432.
Carnap, R.: 1956,Meaning and Necessity, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Church, A.: 1943, ‘Carnap's Introduction to Semantics’,The Philosophical Review 52.
Church, A.: 1951, ‘A Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation’, in P. Henle et al. (eds),Structure, Method and Meaning, Liberal Arts Press, New York, pp. 3–24.
Donnellan, K.: 1970, ‘Proper Names and Identifying Descriptions’, in D. Davidson and G. Harmon (eds.),Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 356–379.
Dummett, M.: 1981a,Frege:Philosophy of Language, 2nd ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Dummett, M.: 1981b,The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Evans, G.: 1981, ‘Understanding Demonstratives’, in H. Parret and J. Bouveresse (eds.),Meaning and Understanding, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 280–303.
Evans, G.: 1982,The Varieties of Reference, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Forbes, G.: 1990, ‘The Indispensability of Sinn’,The Philosophical Review 99, 535–563.
Frege, G.: 1964,The Basic Laws of Arithmetic (BLA), edited by M. Furth, University of California Press, Berkeley.
Frege, G.: 1979,Posthumous Writings (PW), edited by Hans Hermes et al., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Frege, G.: 1984,Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy (CP), edited by B. McGuinness, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Geach, P.: 1975, ‘Names and Identity’, in S. Guttenplan (ed.),Mind and Language, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 139–158.
Heal, J.: 1979, ‘Thoughts and Things’,Aristotelian Society Proceedings 53, 43–59.
Jackson, H.: 1962, ‘Frege on Sense-Functions’,Analysis 23, 84–87.
Kripke, S.: 1980,Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
McDowell, J.: 1984, ‘De Re Senses’, in C. Wright (ed.),Frege:Tradition and Influence, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 98–109.
Peacocke, C.: 1981, ‘Demonstrative Thought and Psychological Explanation’,Synthese 49, 187–217.
Perry, J.: 1977, ‘Frege on Demonstratives’,The Philosophical Review 86, 474–497.
Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’, inMind, Language, and Reality:Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Salmon, N.: 1981,Reference and Essence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Salmon, N.: 1986,Frege's Puzzle, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Searle, J.: 1983,Intentionality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Tichy, P.: 1986, ‘Frege and the Case of the Missing Sense’,Grazer Philosophische Studien 27, 27–47.
Tichy, P.: 1988,The Foundations of Frege's Logic, de Gruyter, Berlin.
Zaiss, J.: 1988,Fregean Senses (doctoral dissertation), University of California, Irvine.
Zaiss, J.: 1992, ‘The Notion of Sense in Frege's Ontology’,Philosophical Papers 21, 21–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaiss, J. Taking Frege's name in vain. Erkenntnis 39, 167–190 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128227
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128227