Skip to main content
Log in

Taking Frege's name in vain

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A widely held view about Fregean Sense has it that the determination of a sign's referent by the sign's sense is achieved viasatisfaction: the sense specifies a condition (or set of conditions) and the referent is that entity, if any, which uniquely satisfies that (set of) condition(s). This is usually held in conjunction with the claim that the sense is existentially and qualitatively independent of the referent: if the referent did not exist, or did not uniquely satisfy the sense, the sense would still exist and would still specify the same condition(s) that it actually does (and might determine a different referent than its actual one). Proponents of this view give several reasons for holding it. I describe these reasons and argue that they are not convincing. More generally, I try to show that the notion of satisfaction has no useful application within Frege's system. I then suggest an alternative account of the determination of a referent by a sense that I think is truer to Frege and more illuminating. Compared to the satisfaction view, my account construes determination as a more naturalistic and epistemically real relation between speakers and things in the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anscombe, G. and P. Geach: 1961,Three Philosophers, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1977, ‘BeliefDe Re’,The Journal of Philosophy 74, 338–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T.: 1979, ‘Sinning Against Frege’,The Philosophical Review 88, 398–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R.: 1956,Meaning and Necessity, 2nd ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, A.: 1943, ‘Carnap's Introduction to Semantics’,The Philosophical Review 52.

  • Church, A.: 1951, ‘A Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation’, in P. Henle et al. (eds),Structure, Method and Meaning, Liberal Arts Press, New York, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnellan, K.: 1970, ‘Proper Names and Identifying Descriptions’, in D. Davidson and G. Harmon (eds.),Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 356–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1981a,Frege:Philosophy of Language, 2nd ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1981b,The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.: 1981, ‘Understanding Demonstratives’, in H. Parret and J. Bouveresse (eds.),Meaning and Understanding, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 280–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G.: 1982,The Varieties of Reference, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, G.: 1990, ‘The Indispensability of Sinn’,The Philosophical Review 99, 535–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1964,The Basic Laws of Arithmetic (BLA), edited by M. Furth, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1979,Posthumous Writings (PW), edited by Hans Hermes et al., University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1984,Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy (CP), edited by B. McGuinness, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geach, P.: 1975, ‘Names and Identity’, in S. Guttenplan (ed.),Mind and Language, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, J.: 1979, ‘Thoughts and Things’,Aristotelian Society Proceedings 53, 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, H.: 1962, ‘Frege on Sense-Functions’,Analysis 23, 84–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1980,Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J.: 1984, ‘De Re Senses’, in C. Wright (ed.),Frege:Tradition and Influence, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 98–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C.: 1981, ‘Demonstrative Thought and Psychological Explanation’,Synthese 49, 187–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J.: 1977, ‘Frege on Demonstratives’,The Philosophical Review 86, 474–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H.: 1975, ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’, inMind, Language, and Reality:Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, N.: 1981,Reference and Essence, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, N.: 1986,Frege's Puzzle, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.: 1983,Intentionality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, P.: 1986, ‘Frege and the Case of the Missing Sense’,Grazer Philosophische Studien 27, 27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, P.: 1988,The Foundations of Frege's Logic, de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaiss, J.: 1988,Fregean Senses (doctoral dissertation), University of California, Irvine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaiss, J.: 1992, ‘The Notion of Sense in Frege's Ontology’,Philosophical Papers 21, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaiss, J. Taking Frege's name in vain. Erkenntnis 39, 167–190 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128227

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01128227

Keywords

Navigation