Advertisement

Soviet Atomic Energy

, Volume 60, Issue 5, pp 395–400 | Cite as

Production of123I by irradiating124Xe with 20–30-MeV protons

  • B. V. Zhuravlev
  • S. P. Ivanova
  • N. N. Krasnov
  • Yu. N. Shubin
Articles

Conclusion

The method of obtaining123I by irradiating highly enriched124Xe with protons in the energy range from 28 to 30 MeV ensures a, high efficiency in producing the radioisotope, which is twice as high as that achieved in the reaction127I(p, 5n)\({}^{123}Xe\xrightarrow[{\beta ^ + ,\varepsilon }]{{2.08h}}^{123}\) with a proton energy of 65 MeV [1]. In this, there is hardly any124I impurity, while the amount of the125I impurity is much smaller. An efficiency of123I production that is entirely acceptable for practical purposes is also achieved with a proton energy of 22 MeV: 11.7 Ci (1 Ci=3.7·1010 Bq) after 26-h irradiation with a 50-μA beam.

Calculations of the excitation functions performed in [12] according to the ALICE program yielded results somewhat different from ours, but the integral123I yield for a proton energy of 28 MeV was practically the same.

Thus, the above method of123I production makes it possible to use 22-30-MeV cyclotrons, i. e., the great majority of cyclotrons presently utilized for the production of medical radioisotopes [11]. This could probably solve the problem of adequate supply of the medically important123I radioisotope that would be free from the124I impurity.

Keywords

Energy Range Great Majority Practical Purpose Excitation Function Proton Energy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    R. Weinreich, “Critical comparison of production methods for Iodine-123,” in: Proc. Panel Discussion Iodine-123 in Western Europe, Julich, KFA (1976), p. 49.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Malinin and N. Kurenkov, “Production of radionuclides by photonuclear reactions,” Radiochem. Radioanal. Lett.,53, (5–6), 311–318 (1982).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Gilat GROGI-2 — A Nuclear Evaporation Computer Code Description and User's Manual, BNL 50246 (T-580) (1970).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Wilmore and P. Hodgson, “The calculation of neutron cross sections from optical potentials,” Nucl. Phys.,55, 673 (1964).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Perey, “Optical model analysis of proton elastic scattering in the range of 9 to 22 MeV,” Phys. Rev.,131, 745 (1963).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Huizenga, “Theoretical reaction cross sections for alpha particles with an optical model,” Nucl. Phys.,29, 462 (1963).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Dilg, W. Schantle, H. Vonach, and M. Uhl, “Level density parameters for the back-shifted Fermi gas model in the mass range 40–250,” Nucl. Phys.,A217, 269 (1973).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Wapstra and K. Bos, “The 1977 atomic mass evaluation,” At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables,19, 177–214 (1977).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. A. Kravtsov, Atomic Masses and Nuclear Binding Energies [in Russian], Atomizdat, Moscow (1974).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    N. Krasnov, “Thick target yield,” J. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes,25, 223 (1974).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Silvester and S. Water, “Radionuclide production,” in: Proc. of Second Int. Symp. on Radiopharmaceuticals, March 19–22, 1979, Seattle, USA.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Grabmayr and R. Nowothy, “Statistical-model based evaluation of reaction producing123I and127Xe,” Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes,29, 261 (1978).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. V. Zhuravlev
  • S. P. Ivanova
  • N. N. Krasnov
  • Yu. N. Shubin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations