Advertisement

Sociological Forum

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 283–299 | Cite as

Denying the data: Learning from the accomplished sciences

  • Eric M. Leifer
Articles
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

Accomplished sciences are distinguished by an active orientation to data. Rather than explaining passive observations or even laboratory results, these sciences put a premium on creating effects or objects never before observed. Theories provide a basis for denying the data, in showing how nature can be better organized to produce some new effect or object. In this paper, a method for constructing these theories is developed. A sociological application is carried out to the point where an accomplishment is claimed. A very peculiar object is discovered — a relationship. Though it does not resemble anything we may have ever observed, it offers to groping actors a guide to something that works and hence could become something that is commonly observed. Likely scruples are addressed that might block the pursuit of such accomplishments.

Key words

theory construction symmetries methods relationships accomplishment science 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez, Luis W. 1987 Adventures of a Physicist. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  2. 1964 Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  3. 1977 Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blumer, Herbert 1969 Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bollen, Kenneth 1989 Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Broad, William, andNicholas Wade 1982 Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, Craig M. 1982 “Administrative succession and organization performance: The succession effect.” Administrative Science Quarterly 27:1–16.Google Scholar
  8. Chandler, Alfred 1962 Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clausewitz, Carl von 1976 On War. (1826*) Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Collins, Randall 1989 “Sociology: Proscience or antiscience?” American Sociological Review 54:124–139.Google Scholar
  11. Cuff, Robert 1973 The War Industries Board: Business-Government Relations During World War I. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Einstein, Albert 1961 Relativity: The Special and the General Theory. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Feynman, Richard P. 1985 “Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!” Adventures of a Curious Character. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  14. Glashow, Sheldon L. 1988 Interactions: A Journey Through the Mind of a Particle Physicist and the Matter of This World. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
  15. Gooding, David, Trevor Pinch, andSimon Schaffer 1989 The Uses of Experiment: Studies in the Natural Sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hawley, Ellis 1966 The New Deal and the Problems of Monopoly: A Study in Economic Ambivalence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Homans, George C. 1967 The Nature of the Social Sciences. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  18. 1988a “Interaction preludes to role setting: Exploratory local action.” American Sociological Review 53:865–878.Google Scholar
  19. 1988b “Trails of involvement: Evidence for local games.” Sociological Forum 3:499–524.Google Scholar
  20. 1990 “Inequality among equals: Embedding market and authority relations in league sports.” American Journal of Sociology 96:655–683.Google Scholar
  21. 1991 Actors as Observers: A Theory of Skill in Social Relationships. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  22. Machiavelli, Niccolo 1950 The Prince and the Discourses. (1520*) New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  23. Rawls, John 1971 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rytina, Steve, andDavid L. Morgan 1982 “The arithmetic of social relations: The interplay of category and network.” American Journal of Sociology 88:88–113.Google Scholar
  25. Schelling, Thomas 1978 The Micromotives of Macrobehavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. 1948 Walden Two. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. 1971 Beyond Freedom and Dignity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  28. Stinchcombe, Arthur 1987 Constructing Social Theories, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Turner, Stephen P. 1987 “Underdetermination and the promise of statistical sociology.” Sociological Theory 5:172–184.Google Scholar
  30. Watson, James D. 1968 The Double Helix. New York: Signet Books.Google Scholar
  31. White, Harrison C. 1963 Anatomy of Kinship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Winch, Peter 1966 The Idea of Social Science. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric M. Leifer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyColumbia UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations