Skip to main content
Log in

Sociology and nuclear weapons: A view from outside

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

Calling attention to the relatively few contributions made by sociologists to the study of nuclear issues, a political scientist suggests a number of areas and questions that sociology may be particularly well equipped to deal with. The study is divided into a canvas of questions that come from the first 45 years of the nuclear age, and then assesses the questions that may emerge in an evolving “post-Cold War” era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achen, Christopher andDuncan Snidal 1989 “Rational deterrence theory and comparative case studies.” World Politics 61:143–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, Peter, Larry Campbell, Paul Crumlish, Michael Dobkowski, andSteven Lee 1989 The Nuclear Predicament. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, Robert 1988 “The nuclear disarmament movement.” In Lester Kurtz (ed.), The Nuclear Cage: 237–265. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, Robert andLester Kurtz 1987 “Performing the nuclear ceremony: The arms race as a ritual.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 23:463–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Elizabeth et al. 1986 Peace Resource Book. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, P. L. andJ. C. Gessner 1983 “Fear and trembling.” Youth and Society 15:237–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, Bruce andHenry Kendall 1990 “Accidental nuclear war.” Scientific American 263(December):53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, Herbert 1952 The Herblock Book. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock-Utne, Birgit 1985 Educating for Peace. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, Paul, ed. 1985 Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate: Nukespeak Today. Dover, NH: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Carol 1987 “Sex and death in the rational world of defense intellectuals.” Signs 12:687–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuzzort, Ray 1989 Using Social Thought: The Nuclear Issue and Other Concerns. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easle, Brian 1987 Fathering the Unthinkable: Masculinity, Scientists, and the Nuclear Arms Race. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshtain, Jean 1987 Women and War. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evernden, Jack 1988 “Lies that stopped a test ban.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 44:20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finsterbusch, Kurt 1988 “The sociological literature on nuclear issues.” Sociological Inquiry 58:22–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussell, Paul 1975 The Great War and Modern Memory. London: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, George 1972 The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion 1935–1971. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William andAndrea Modigliani 1963 “Tensions and concessions.” Social Problems 11:34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, Allen 1990 “Research on conflict talk.” In Allen Grimshaw (ed.), Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversation: 281–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, Ron 1981 All Aboard! New York: Workman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, Irving 1982 Groupthink, 2nd ed. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, Morris 1960 The Professional Soldier. Glencoe, IL; Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowitz, Morris andRoger Little 1974 Sociology and the Military Establishment, 3rd ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, Robert, R. Ned Lebow, andJanice Gross Stein 1985 Psychology and Deterrence. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, Bernard, S. Michael Kalick, andMichael Milburn 1983 “Attitudes toward nuclear weapons and nuclear war.” Journal of Social Issues 39:7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, Ronald andSam Marullo 1985 “Toward a sociology of nuclear weapons.” The Sociological Quarterly 26:277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesberg, Louis 1986 “Clinical sociology and preventing nuclear war.” Clinical Sociology Review 4:91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas 1970 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, Lester 1988 The Nuclear Cage. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, Imre 1978 The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberson, Stanley 1971 “An empirical study of military-industrial linkages.” American Journal of Sociology 76:562–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, Robert J. andRichard Falk 1982 Indefensible Weapons. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, Sharon, Pat Holden, andShirley Ardener, eds. 1988 Images of Women in Peace and War. Madison: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, Eric andJohn Harris 1984 “The role of education in preventing nuclear war.” Harvard Educational Review 54:282–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, Robert S. 1986 Blundering into Disaster. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. Wright 1958 The Causes of World War III. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Carol, ed. 1988 The Politics of the Gender Gap. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paarlberg, Rob 1973 “Forgetting about the unthinkable.” Foreign Policy 10:132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, Thomas 1990 “How the bomb was kept from Hitler.” The Atlantic May:126–132.

  • Prewitt, Kenneth 1984 “Security studies and the social sciences.” Social Science Research Council Annual Report, 1983–1984:xiii–xxiii.

  • Robinson, John et al. 1989 “News media use and adolescents' attitudes about nuclear issues: An American-Soviet comparison.” Journal of Communication 39:105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Peter 1963 “The public and the threat of war.” Social Problems 11:62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwebel, Milton 1982 “Effects of the nuclear war threat on children and teenagers.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 52:608–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoke, Richard withWillis Harman 1987 Paths to Peace. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szegedy-Maszak, Marianne 1989 “Rise and fall of the Washington peace industry.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 45:18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbott, Strobe 1985 Deadly Gambits. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Theodore 1987 “Third generation nuclear weapons.” Scientific American 256:30–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO 1981 Yearbook on Peace and Conflict Studies. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Mark 1990 German National Socialism and the Quest for Nuclear Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Robin M., Jr. 1985 “The use of threats in US/USSR relations.” In Louis Kreisberg (ed.), Research in Social Movements, Conflicts, and Change: 1–32. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beckman, P.R. Sociology and nuclear weapons: A view from outside. Sociol Forum 7, 7–27 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01124754

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01124754

Key words

Navigation