Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The fertility transition: Europe and the Third World compared

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

This article compares the declines in fertility in Europe and the Third World. Lower levels of fertility were largely due to the adoption of innovative behavior within marriage. So far this transformation of reproduction has been monotonic and rapid. Socioeconomic development is associated with the timing of the onset of the transition and is responsible for differences among groups during the transition, although it is not yet possible to rule out alternative explanations such as ideational or institutional change. The pace and pervasiveness of the declines, however, suggest that a mechanism of diffusion is involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, Ferial 1987 “Fertility transitions in Egypt.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Alba, F. andJ. E. Potter 1986 “Population and development in Mexico since 1940: An interpretation.” Population and Development Review 12(1):47–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, George Forthcoming Family and the Female Life Course: The Women of Verviers, Belgium, 1849–1880 Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

  • Anderson, Benedict 1983 Imagined Communities. London: Verso Editions.

  • Anderson, Barbara A. 1986 “Regional and cultural factors in the decline of marital fertility in Western Europe: Nonsocioeconomic influences on marital fertility.” In Ansley J. Coale and Susan Cotts Watkins (eds.), The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrantes, M. G., J. McCarthy, andN. Yinger 1983 “Public policy and female sterilization in Costa Rica.’ Studies in Family Planning 14(10):246–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bean, F. 1983 “The baby boom and its explanations.” The Sociological Quarterly 24:353–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, P. N. M., S. Preston, andT. Dyson 1984 Vital Rates in India, 1961–1981. Committee on Population and Demography, Report No. 24. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. 1985 “The fertility transition: Continuity or discontinuity with the past?” In International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, International Population Conferences, Florence, Vol. 3:393–405.

  • Bordieu, P. 1977 Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1978 “A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility.” Population and Development Review 4(1):105–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “The transition in reproductive behavior in the Third World.” Center for Policy Studies Working Paper No. 125, The Population Council, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongaarts, J. andJ. Menken 1983 “The supply of children: A critical essay.” In R. A. Bulatao and R. D. Lee (eds.), Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries, Vol. 1:27–60. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1977 “The role of marital sexual abstinence in determining fertility: A study of the Yoruba in Nigeria.” Population Studies 31(2):193–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982 Theory of Fertility Decline. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C. 1986 “Family change and demographic change: The reversal of the veneration flow.” Distinguished lectureship address to the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, New York, August 30–September 3.

  • Caldwell, J. C. andP. Caldwell 1985 “Cultural forces tending to sustain high fertility in tropical Africa.” PHN Technical Note 85-16, World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C. andT. L. Ruzicka 1978 “The Australian fertility transition: An analysis.” Population and Development Review 4(1):81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, G. 1966 “The decline of fertility: Innovation or adjustment process.” Population Studies 20(2):149–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casterline, J. B., S. Singh, J. Cleland, andH. Ashurst 1984 “The proximate determinants of fertility.” WFS Comparative Studies No. 39. Voorburg, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casterline, J. and M. Pereira 1987 “Georgraphy as destiny: Regional effects on fertility in developing countries.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago, April 29–May 2.

  • Chaunu, Pierre 1973 “Reflexions sur la demographie normande.” In Sur la Population Française au XVIIe et XIXe Siècles. Paris: Société de Démographie Historique.

  • Cleland, J. 1985 “Martial fertility decline in developing countries: Theories and the evidence.” In John Cleland and John Hobcraft (eds.), Reproductive Change in Developing Countries: Insights from the World Fertility Survey: 223–252. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, J. andC. Wilson 1987 “Demand theories of the fertility transition: An iconoclastic view.” Population Studies 41:5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J. 1973 “The demographic transition reconsidered.” In International Union for the Scientific Study of Population, International Population Conference, Liege, 1973, Vol. 1:53–72.

  • 1984 “Rapid Population Change in China, 1952–1982.” Committee on Population and Demography, National Research Council, Report No. 27. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “The decline of fertility in Europe since the 18th century as a chapter in demographic history.” In Ansley J. Coale and Susan Cotts Watkins (eds.) The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J., L. J. Cho, andN. Goldman 1980 “Estimation of recent trends in fertility and mortality in the Republic of Korea.” Committee on Population and Demography, Report No. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J. andR. Treadway 1986 “A summary of the changing distribution of overall fertility, marital fertility, and the proportion married in the provinces of Europe.” In Ansley J. Coale and Susan Cotts Watkins (eds.), The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coale, A. J. andS. C. Watkins 1986 The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, P. A. andW. C. Sanderson 1987 “The emergence of a two-child norm among American birth-controllers.” Population and Development Review 13(1):1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1945 “The world demographic transition.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 273:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1955 “Institutional patterns favoring high fertility in underdeveloped areas.” Eugenics Quarterly 2(1):33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1963 The theory of change and response in modern demographic history. Population Index 29(4):345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. 1978 “The economics and sociology of fertility: A synthesis.” In C. Tilly (ed.), Historical Studies of Changing Fertility: 57–113. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewbank, Doug 1987 “The history of American marital fertility before 1920, Part 1: The fertility transition among whites.” Unpublished manuscript, Population Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Flinn, M. 1981 The European Demographic System, 1500–1820. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, O. andG. McNicoll 1987 “An interpretation of fertility and population policy in Kenya.” Population and Development Review 13(2):209–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1961–62 “The sociology of human fertility.” Current Sociology X/XI(2):35–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 “The contribution of social science research to population policy and family planning program effectiveness.” Studies in Family Planning 18(2):57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, R., S-E. Khoo, andB. Supraptilah 1981 “Modern contraceptive use in Indonesia: A challenge to conventional wisdom.” WFS Scientific Reports No. 20. Voorburg, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, Dov andEliahu Ben Moshe 1986 “Occupations, migrants, sex ratios, and nuptiality in nineteenth century English communities: A model of relationships. Demography 23(1):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendell, M. 1984 “Stalls in fertility decline in Costa Rica, Korea and Sri Lanka.” World Bank Staff working paper no. 693. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. 1973 “The strength of weak ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78(3):1360–1379.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1965 “European marriage patterns in perspective.” In D. V. Glass and D. E. C. Eversley (eds.), Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography: 101–143. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982 “Two kinds of pre-industrial household formation systems.” Population and Development Review 3(8):449–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeren, H. J. 1982 “Pronatalist population policies in some Western European countries.” Population Research and Policy Review 1:137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, L. 1961 “Some data on natural fertility.” Eugenics Quarterly 8:81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himes, N. E. 1970 (1936*) Medical History of Contraception. New York: Schocken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobcraft, J. andJ. Cleland, eds. 1985 Reproductive Change in Developing Countries: Insights from the World Fertility Survey. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollerbach, P. E. and S. Diaz-Briquets 1983 “Fertility determinants in Cuba.” Center for Policy Studies Working Paper No. 102, The Population Council, New York.

  • Howell, N. 1979 Demography of the Dobe! Kung. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N. 1985 “An east Javanese village in 1953 and 1985: Observations on development.” Population and Development Review 11(4):695–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyfitz, N. andW. Flieger 1968 World Population: An Analysis of Vital Data. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1955 “Dynamics of human populations.” Eugenics Quarterly 2(1):18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1971 “A new demographic transition?” In National Academy of Sciences, Rapid Population Growth, Consequences and Policy Implications, Vol. II. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J. 1974 The Decline of Fertility in Germany, 1871–1939. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “Natural fertility: Age patterns levels and trends.” In R. Bulatao and R. D. Lee (eds.), Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries: A Summary of Knowledge, Vol 1: 61–102. New York: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “The demographic transition in German villages.” In Ansley J. Coale and Susan C. Watkins (eds.), The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1967 “Breast feeding, fertility and infant mortality: An analysis of some early German data.” Population Studies 21(2):109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 “Lessons from the past: Population implications of historical fertility studies.” Population and Development Review 5(2):217–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J., A. Chamratrithinong, N. Chayovan, andN. Debavalya 1982 Fertility in Thailand: Trends, Differentials and Proximate Determinants. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knodel, J., N. Havanon, andA. Pramualratana 1984 “Fertility transition in Thailand: A qualitative analysis.” Population and Development Review 10(2):297–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreager, P. 1982 “Demography in situ.” Population and Development Review 8(2):237–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, C. M. 1981 “Fertility changes in Sri Lanka since the war: An analysis of the experience of different districts.” Population Studies 35(2):285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapham, R. J. andW. P. Mauldin 1985 “Contraceptive prevalence: The influence of organized family planning programs.” Studies in Family Planning 16(3):117–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1977 The Decline of Belgian Fertility, 1800–1970. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “A century of demographic and cultural change in Western Europe.” Population and Development Review 9(3):411–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, R. andC. Wilson 1986 “Modes of production, secularization and the pace of fertility decline in Western Europe, 1870–1930.” In Ansley J. Coale and Susan C. Watkins (eds.), The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. 1977 Family Formation in an Age of Nascent Capitalism. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, M. J., Jr. 1966 Modernization and the Structure of Societies: A Setting for International Affairs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightbourne, R. E. 1980 “Urban-rural differentials in contraceptive uses.” World Fertility Survey Comparative Studies No. 10. Voorburg, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livi-Bacci, M. 1986 “Social group forerunners of fertility decline in Europe.” In Ansley J. Coale and Susan C. Watkins (eds.), The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockridge, K. A. 1983 “The Fertility Transition in Sweden.” The Demographic Data Base Report No. 3, University of Umea.

  • Lorimer, F. 1954 Cultures and Human Fertility. Paris: UNESCO

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. 1972 The Myth of Population Control: Family, Caste, and Class in an Indian Village. Monthly Review Press: New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiessen, P. C. 1985 The Limitation of Family Size in Denmark. Kobenhaven: Munksgaard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiessen, P. C. andJ. C. McCann 1978 “The role of mortality in the European fertility transition: Aggregate-level relations.” In S. H. Preston (ed.), The Effects of Infant and Child Mortality on Fertility. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 Sexuality and Social Order: The Debate over the Fertility of Women and Workers in France, 1770–1920. New York: Holmes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 Reproductive Rituals. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 “Institutional determinants of fertility change.” Population and Development Review 6(3):441–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNicoll, G. 1983 “Notes on the local context of demographic changes.” Center for Policy Studies Working Paper No. 98, The Population Council, New York.

  • Murty, K. R. andS. De Vos 1984 “Ethnic differences in contraceptive use in Sri Lanka.” Studies in Family Planning 15(5):222–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nag, M. 1983 “The impact of sociocultural factors on breastfeeding and sexual behavior.” In R. A. Bulatao and R. D. Lee (eds.), Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries, Vol. 1:163–198. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nag, M. andN. Kak 1984 “Demographic transition in a Punjab village.” Population and Development Review 10(4):661–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nortman, D. L. 1985 “Family planning program funds: Sources, levels and trends.” Center for Policy Studies Working Paper No. 113, The Population Council, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1945 “Population—The long view.” In T. W. Schultz (ed.), Food for the World: 36–57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1953 “Economic problems of population change.” In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Agricultural Economists. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, H. andR. Lesthaeghe, eds. 1981 Child-spacing in Tropical Africa: Traditions and Change. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Population Information Program 1985 “The impact of family planning programs on fertility.” Population Reports, Series J, No. 29. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retherford, R. D. 1985 “A theory of marital fertility transition.” Population Studies 39(2):249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, G. andJ. Cleland 1981 “Socio-economic determinants of marital fertility in 20 countries: Multivariate analysis.” In World Fertility Survey Conference 1980: Record of Proceedings, Vol. 2. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1974 “Comment.” In T. W. Schultz, (ed.), Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children and Human Capital: 76–80. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 “The future of American fertility.” Social Problems 26(3):359–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “Fertility and family structure.” Population Bulletin of the United Nations No. 15. Department of International Economic and Social Affairs. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. 1976 The Moral Economy of the Peasant. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W., ed. 1974 Economics of the Family: Marriage, Children and Human Capital. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seccombe, W. 1983 “Marxism and demography.” New Left Review 137:22–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharlin, Allan 1986 “Urban-rural differences in fertility in Europe during the demographic transition.” In Ansley J. Coale and Susan C. Watkins (eds.), The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorter, E., J. Knodel, andE. van de Walle 1971 “The decline of non-marital fertility in Europe, 1880–1940.” Population Studies 25(3):375–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. S. 1973 “Parental power and marriage patterns: An analysis of historical trends in Hingham, Massachusetts.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 35:419–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloway, R. A. 1982 Birth Control and the Population Question in England, 1827–1930. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolnitz, G. J. et al. n.d. Quantitative Approaches to Analyzing Socio-economic Determinants of Third World Fertility Trends: Review of the Literature. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Fertility Determinants Group, Inc.

  • Stycos, J. M. withO. F. Seeley andR. C. Avery 1978 “Patterns of fertility decline in Costa Rica.” International Population Program, Cornell University. Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabutin, D. 1985 Les limites de la theorie classique de la transition demographique pour l'Occident du XIXeme siecle etle Tiers-Monde actuel. In I.U.S.S.P. International Population Conference, Florence, Vol 4:357–371.

  • Thompson, W. S. 1929 “Population.” American Journal of Sociology 34:959–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. 1986 “Review of The Decline of Fertility in Europe.” Population and Development Review 12(2):323–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations 1985 World Population Prospects: Estimates and Projects as Assessed in 1982. U.N. Department of International Economic and Social Affairs. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaessen, M. 1980 “Knowledge of contraceptive methods.” World Fertility Survey Comparative Studies No. 8. Voorburg, Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1974 The Female Population of France in the Nineteenth Century: A Reconstruction of 82 Departments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 “Motivations and technology in the decline of French fertility.” In R. Wheaton and T. Hareven (eds.), Family and Sexuality in French History. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Walle, E. and J. Kekevole 1986 “Demographic trends in sub-Saharan Africa.” African Demography working paper no. 14, Population Studies Center, University of Pennsylvania.

  • van de Walle, E. and F. van de Walle forthcoming “On the paradigm of the fertility transition.” In Anne Meyering (ed.), Fertility Transitions.

  • van de Walle, F. 1986 “Infant mortality and the European demographic transition.” In Ansley J. Coale and Susan C. Watkins (eds.), The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “Conclusions.” In Ansley J. Coale and Susan C. Watkins (eds.), The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton, University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, S. C. 1987 “Demographic nationalism in Western Europe.” Paper presented at the Shelby Cullom Davis Center, Princeton University, April.

  • Weir, D. 1983 “Fertility transition in rural France.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.

  • 1984 “Life under pressure: France and England, 1670–1870.” Journal of Economic History 44(1):27–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Robert V. 1971 “Family size and fertility control in eighteenth-century America: A study of Quaker families.” Population Studies 26(1):73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C. 1978 “The unmet need for birth control in five Asian countries.” International Family Planning Perspectives and Digest 4(1):9–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. 1984 “Natural fertility in pre-industrial England.” Population Studies 38:225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank 1984 World Development Report 1984. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrigley, E. A. 1978 “Fertility strategy for the individual and the group.” In C. Tilly (ed.), Historical Studies of Changing Fertility: 135–154. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981 The Population History of England 1541–1871. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “English population history from family reconstitution: Summary results, 1600–1799.” Population Studies 37:157–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pennsylvania, USA

    Susan Cotts Watkins

Authors
  1. Susan Cotts Watkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watkins, S.C. The fertility transition: Europe and the Third World compared. Sociol Forum 2, 645–673 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01124379

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01124379

Keywords

Search

Navigation