Skip to main content
Log in

Physicians, battery, and the duty to give informed consent

  • Published:
The Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay discusses the issue of informed consent as it relates not only to physician duty but also to patient duty. The author is particularly concerned with the possibility of battery charges against the physician unless a clear patient duty is articulated. In summary, the author concludes that we can prevent doctors from being forced to commit battery in a way which allows them to make reasonable choices for their patients without being open to the charge of having committed battery. At the same time, we would not allow doctors to abuse this privelege.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Hull, R. (1985). Informed consent: Patient's right or patient's duty?The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10, 183–197.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, R. (1980). Moral dilemmas and consistency.Journal of Philosophy, 77 (3), 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strasser, M. Physicians, battery, and the duty to give informed consent. J Med Hum 8, 40–48 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01119347

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01119347

Keywords

Navigation