Skip to main content
Log in

Stricture and nasal place assimilation

  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theories of feature organization typically treat stricture features like [continuant], [consonantal] and [approximant] as independent of place of articulation features. The best argument for this view centers on [continuant] and facts of nasal place assimilation — in particular, instances of nasal place assimilation to fricatives, where the nasal appears to remain a stop. However, a closer look at nasal place assimilation provides a strong argument against this standard view: across languages, place assimilation to fricatives is highly disfavored in comparison to assimilation to stops, and occurring nasal-fricative clusters behave like affricates. I show how a theory in which [continuant] is place-dependent can explain these facts, exploiting the notion of structure preservation. The treatment of stricture proposed brings feature geometry more in line with models based on facts of phonetics and vocal tract anatomy, e.g., the gestural model of Browman and Goldstein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Stephen: 1975, ‘The Description of Nasal Consonants and the Internal Structure of Segments’, in C. A. Ferguson et al.,Nasalfest, Language Universals Project, Dept. of Linguistics, Stanford University, 1–25.

  • Archangeli, Diana: 1984,Underspecification in Yawelmani Phonology and Morphology, doctoral dissertation, MIT.

  • Archangeli, Diana: 1988, ‘Aspects of Underspecification Theory’,Phonology 5, 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archangeli, Diana and Douglas Pulleyblank: 1986,The Content and Structure of Phonological Representations, unpublished manuscript, University of Arizona and University of Ottawa.

  • Archangeli, Diana and Douglas Pulleyblank: to appear,Grounded Phonology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  • Aronoff, Mark and Richard Oehrle: 1984,Language Sound Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethin, Christina: 1984, ‘A Syllabic Analysis of Nasal Vowels in Polish’,Studies in Language 8(2), 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowsky, Toni: 1986,Topics in the Lexical Phonology of English, doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, William: 1972, ‘The Enunciative Vowel’, in theInternational Journal of Dravidian Linguistics 1, 26–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Maria Zagórska: 1968,Nasal Vowels in Contemporary Standard Polish—an Acoustic-Phonetic Analysis, Mouton, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browman, Catherine P. and Louis Goldstein: 1986, ‘Towards an Articulatory Phonology’,Phonology 3, 219–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browman, Catherine P. and Louis Goldstein: 1989, ‘Articulatory Gestures as Phonological Units’,Phonology 6(2), 201–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browman, Catherine P. and Louis Goldstein: 1990, ‘Tiers in Articulatory Phonology, With Some Implications for Casual Speech’, in Kingston and Beckman 1990, 341–397.

  • Calabrese, Andrea: 1987, ‘The Interaction of Phonological Rules and Filters in Salentino’,Proceedings of NELS 17, 79–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catford, J. C.: 1988,A Practical Introduction to Phonetics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Seung-Bog: 1967,A Phonological Study of Korean, Almqvist and Wiksells, Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Young-mee: 1990, ‘A Typology of Voicing Assimilation’,Proceedings of WCCFL 9, 141–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle: 1968,The Sound Pattern of English, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, G. N.: 1985, ‘The Geometry of Phonological Features’,Phonology Yearbook 2, 225–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, G. N.: 1987, ‘Phonological Feature Representation and the Description of Intrusive Stops’,CLS 23,Part II, Chicago Linguistic Society, 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, G. N.: 1988, ‘Toward a Substantive Theory of Feature Specification’,NELS 18, GLSA, UMass, Amherst, MA, 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, G. N.: 1991, ‘Phonological Primes: Gestures or Features?’, inActes du XIIème Congrès International des Sciences Phonètiques I, Publications de l'Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, G. N.: to appear, ‘Place of Articulation in Consonants and Vowels: a Unified Theory’, in B. Laks and A. Rialland (eds.),L'Architecture et la Géometrie des Représentations Phonologiques, Editions du C.N.R.S. Paris.

  • Cohn, Abigail: 1989, ‘Phonetic Evidence for Configuration Constraints’,Proceedings of NELS 19, 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Abigail: 1990,Phonetic and Phonological Rules of Nasalization, doctoral dissertation,UCLA Working Papers 76.

  • Cohn, Abigail: to appear, ‘The Status of Nasalized Continuants’, to appear in M. K. Huffman and R. Krakow,The Feature Nasal: Phonetic Bases and Phonological Implications, Academic Press, San Diego.

  • Coupez, André: 1980,Abrégé de Grammaire Rwanda 1, Institute National de Recherche Scientifique, Butare, République Rwandaise.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa: 1988,Investigations into Polish Morphology and Phonology, doctoral dissertation, MIT.

  • Czaykowska-Higgins, Ewa: 1992, ‘Placelessness, Markedness and Polish Nasals’,Linguistic Inquiry 23, 139–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Stuart: 1989, ‘The Location of the Feature [continuant] in Feature Geometry’,Lingua 78, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bhaldraithe, Tomás: 1975,The Irish of Cois Fhairrge, Co. Galway, The Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.

  • Dell, François: 1973,Les Règles et les Sons, Introduction à la Phonologie Générative, Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doke, C. M.: 1926,The Phonetics of the Zulu Language, special issue ofBantu Studies 2.

  • Doke, C. M.: 1931,The Southern Bantu Languages, Dawsons of Pall Mall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duanmu, San: 1990,A Formal Study of Syllable, Tone, Stress and Domain in Chinese Languages, doctoral dissertation, MIT.

  • Dukiewicz, L.: 1967,Połskie Gloski Nosowe: Analiza Akustyczna, Państwowe Wydawnictwa Naukowe, Warszawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsson, S.: 1940, ‘Nasal + Spirant or Liquid in Icelandic’,The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 34, 462–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, John: 1990,Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology, Basil Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, John: to appear, ‘Harmonic Phonology’, in J. Goldsmith (ed.),The Last Phonological Rule: Reflections on Constraints and Derivations in Phonology, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

  • Gussmann, Edmund: 1980,Studies in Abstract Phonology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Kenneth: 1973, ‘Deep-Surface Canonical Disparities in Relation to Analysis and Change: an Australian Example’, in T. Seboek (ed.),Current Trends in Linguistics II, Mouton, The Hague, 401–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris and Kenneth Stevens: 1971, ‘A Note on Laryngeal Features’,Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics 101, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, James: 1969,Spanish Phonology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, James 1984, ‘Autosegmental Phonology, Lexical Phonology, and Spanish Nasals’, in Aronoff and Oehrle, 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Bruce: 1984, ‘The Phonetics and Phonology of Russian Voicing Assimilation’, in Aronoff and Oehrle, 318–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, B.: 1986, ‘Inalterability in CV Phonology’,Language 62, 321–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, Robert: 1986,Language Universals, Markedness Theory, and Natural Phonetic Processes, Mouton de Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, Joan: 1972, ‘The Syllable in Phonological Theory’,Language 48, 525–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inkelas, Sharon and Young-mee Cho: to appear, ‘Inalterability as Prespecification’, to appear inLanguage.

  • Itô, Junko: 1986,Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology, doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, published 1988, by Garland Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itô, Junko: 1989, ‘A Prosodic Theory of Epenthesis’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7, 217–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Itô, Junko and R. Armin Mester: to appear, ‘Licensed Segments and Safe Paths’, to appear in C. Paradis and D. LaCharité (eds.),Constraint-Based Theories in Multilinear Phonology, special issue of theCanadian Journal of Linguistics.

  • Itô, Junko, R. Armin Mester and Jaye Padgett: 1993, ‘Constraint Ranking and Underspecification’, report no. LRC-93-08, Linguistics Research Center, UC Santa Cruz.

  • Keating, Patricia: 1988, ‘A Survey of Phonological Features’, Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, Patricia: 1990, ‘The Window Model of Coarticulation: Articulatory Evidence’, in Kingston and Beckman, 451–470.

  • Kenstowicz, Michael: 1972, ‘Lithuanian Phonology’,Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 2(2), University of Illinois, 1–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, John and Mary Beckman (eds): 1990,Papers in Laboratory Phonology I.Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, Cambridge University Press.

  • Kiparsky, Paul: 1982, ‘Lexical Phonology and Morphology’,Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Seoul, Hanshin Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiparsky, Paul: 1985, ‘Some Consequences of Lexical Phonology’,Phonology 2, 85–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krejnovich, E.: 1937,Fonetika Nivxkogo Jazyka, Gosudarstvennoe Učebno-Pedagogičeskoe Izdatel'stvo, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladefoged, Peter and Ian Maddieson: 1986,Some Sounds of the World's Languages: Preliminary Version,UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 64.

  • Liberman, Mark and Janet Pierrehumbert: 1984, ‘Intonational Invariance Under Changes in Pitch Range and Length’, in Aronoff and Oehrle, 157–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardi, Linda: 1990, ‘The Non-Linear Organization of the Affricate’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 375–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John J.: 1988, ‘Feature Geometry and Dependency: A Review’,Phonetica 43, 84–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John J. and Alan Prince: 1993, ‘Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction’, manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, and Rutgers University, New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddieson, Ian and Peter Ladefoged: 1988, ‘Multiply Articulated Segments and the Feature Hierarchy’, expanded version of a paper presented at the 1988 annual meeting of the LSA.

  • Mascaró, Joan: 1976,Catalan Phonology and the Phonological Cycle, doctoral dissertation, MIT.

  • Mascaró, Joan: 1984, ‘Continuant Spreading in Basque, Catalan and Spanish’, in Aronoff and Oehrle, 287–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mascaró, Joan: 1991a, ‘A Reduction and Spreading Theory of Voicing and Other Sound Effects’, unpublished manuscript., Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.

  • Mascaró, Joan: 1991b, ‘Iberian Spirantization and Continuant Spreading’,Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 1991, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 167–179.

  • Mester, R. Armin and Junko Itô: 1989, ‘Feature Predictability and Underspecification: Palatal Prosody in Japanese Mimetics’,Language 65, 258–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanan, K. P.: 1983, ‘The Structure of the Melody’, unpublished manuscript, MIT and the National University of Singapore.

  • Mohanan, K. P.: 1986,The Theory of Lexical Phonology, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanan, K. P.: 1991, ‘On the Bases of Radical Underspecification’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9, 285–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanan, K. P.: to appear, ‘Fields of Attraction in Phonology’, in J. Goldsmith (ed.),The Last Phonological Rule, Chicago University Press.

  • Murray, R. and Theo Vennemann: 1983, ‘Sound Change and Syllable Structure in Germanic Phonology’,Language 59, 514–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Scott: 1991a, ‘Persistent Rules’,Linguistic Inquiry 22, 315–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Scott: 1991b, ‘Structure Preservation and the Strong Domain Hypothesis’,Linguistic Inquiry 22, 379–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro Tomás, T.: 1965,Manual de Pronunciación Española, Madrid, Publicaciones de la Revista de Filología Española, Núm, III.

  • Newton, B.: 1972,The Generative Interpretation of Dialect, Cambridge University Press.

  • Ní Chiosáin, Máire and Jaye Padgett: 1993, ‘On the Nature of Consonant-Vowel Interaction’, paper presented at the first Holland Institute of Linguistics Phonology Conference, Leiden, and report no. LRC-93-09, Linguistics Research Center, UC Santa Cruz.

  • Ohala, John: 1975, ‘Phonetic Explanations for Nasal Sound Patterns’, in C. A. Ferguson et al.,Nasalfest, Language Universals Project, Dept. of Linguistics, Stanford University, 289–316.

  • Ó Siadhail, Micheál: 1989,Modern Irish, Cambridge University Press.

  • Padgett, Jaye: 1991,Stricture in Feature Geometry, doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, to appear CSLI, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, Carole: 1988, ‘On Constraints and Repair Strategies’,The Linguistic Review 6, 71–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pétursson, M.: 1973, ‘Phonologie des Consonnes Nasales en Islandais Moderne’,La Linguistique 9, 115–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, Janet: 1990, ‘Phonological and Phonetic Representation’,Journal of Phonetics 18.

  • Piggott, G. L.: 1988, ‘On the Autonomy of the Feature Nasal’,CLS 23,Part II, Chicago Linguistic Society, 223–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piggott, G. L.: 1992, ‘Variability in Feature Dependency: The Case of Nasality’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, 33–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poser, William: 1982, ‘Phonological Representations and Action-at-a-Distance’, in H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.),The Structure of Phonological Representations, Part II, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Alan: 1990, ‘Quantitative Consequences of Rhythmic Organization’,Proceedings of CLS 26.

  • Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky: 1993, ‘Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar’, manuscript, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, and University of Colorado, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulleyblank, Douglas: 1989, ‘Patterns of Feature Cooccurrence: The Case of Nasality’, Arizona Phonology Conference 2:Coyote Working Papers 9, 98–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Keren: 1987, ‘The Function of Structure Preservation: Derived Environments’,Proceedings of NELS 17, 501–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubach, Jerzy: 1984,Cyclic and Lexical Phonology, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthall, Samuel: 1989, ‘The Phonology of Nasal-Obstruent Sequences’, unpublished masters thesis, McGill University, Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthall, Samuel: 1992, ‘Prenasalized Stops and Feature Geometry’, inPhonologica 1988, W. U. Dressler, H. C. Luschützky, O. E. Pfeiffer and J. R. Rennison (eds.), Cambridge University Press.

  • Rycroft D. and A. Ngcobo: 1979,Say it in Zulu, SOAS Publications Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagey, Elizabeth: 1986a,The Representation of Features and Relations in Non-Linear Phonology, doctoral dissertation, MIT.

  • Sagey, Elizabeth: 1986b, ‘On the Representation of Complex Segments and their Formation in Kinyarwanda’, in L. Wetzels and E. Sezer (eds.),Studies in Compensatory Lengthening, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Barry and Donca Steriade: 1986, ‘On Geminates’,Linguistic Inquiry 17, 691–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth: 1990, ‘On the Inalterability of Geminates’, paper presented at the Cortona Conference, Italy.

  • Selkirk, Elisabeth: 1991, ‘A Two-Root Theory of Length’, in E. Dunlap and J. Padgett (eds.),University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 14:Papers in Phonology. GLSA, UMass, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Patricia: 1991, ‘Consonant Harmony Systems: the Special Status of Coronal Harmony’, in C. Paradis and J. F. Prunet (eds.),Phonetics and Phonology 2, Academic Press, San Diego, 125–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommerstein, Alan: 1973,The Sound Pattern of Ancient Greek, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Richard: 1973,The Segmental Phonology of Contemporary Standard Polish, doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.

  • Steriade, Donca: 1982,Greek Prosodies and the Nature of Syllabification, doctoral dissertation, MIT.

  • Steriade, Donca: 1986, ‘A Note on Coronal’, manuscript, MIT.

  • Steriade, Donca: 1987, ‘Redundant Values’,CLS 23,Part II, Chicago Linguistic Society, 339–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steriade, Donca: 1989, ‘Affricates’, paper presented at the MIT Conference on Feature Geometry.

  • Steriade, Donca: 1990, ‘Gestures and Autosegments’, in Kingston and Beckman, 382–397.

  • Steriade, Donca: 1991, ‘Closure, Release and Nasal Contours’, unpublished manuscript, UCLA.

  • Stringer, M. and J. Hotz: 1973, ‘Waffa Phonemes’, in H. McKaughan (ed.),The Languages of the Eastern Family of the East New Guinea Highland Stock, University of Washington Press, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, Timothy: 1987,An Introduction to Japanese Phonology, State University of New York Press, Albany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welmers, W. E.: 1962, ‘The Phonology of Kpelle’,Journal of African Languages 1, 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welmers, W. E.: 1973,African Language Structures, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, W. D.: 1889,Sanskrit Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels, W. Leo: 1991, ‘Contrastive and Allophonic Properties of Brazilian Portuguese Vowels’, in D. Wanner and D. Kibbee (eds.),New Analyses in Romance Linguistics, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Karina: 1988, ‘Prosodic Structure and Lardil Phonology’,Linguistic Inquiry 19, 325–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonderly, William: 1946, ‘Phonemic Acculturation in Zoque’,IJAL 12, 92–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonderly, William: 1951, ‘Zoque I,II,III,IV,V,VI’IJAL 17, 1–9, 105–123, 137–162, 235–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonderly, William: 1952,IJAL 18, 35–48, 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, Moira: 1988, ‘The Obligatory Contour Principle and Phonological Rules: A Loss of Identity’,Linguistic Inquiry 19, 65–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, Moira: 1991, ‘Coronals, Consonant Clusters, and the Coda Condition’, in C. Paradis and J. F. Prunet (eds.),Phonetics and Phonology 2, Academic Press, San Diego, 61–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziervogel, D., P. J. Wentzel and T. N. Makuya: 1972,A Handbook of the Venda Language, Pretoria, University of South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper has benefited from discussions with many people, including audiences at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst; the University of Pennsylvania; Cornell University; the University of Maryland, College Park; the University of California, Santa Cruz and the NSF Workshop on Properties of Feature Organization at UCSC, July 1991. I am especially grateful to John McCarthy and Lisa Selkirk and to the following people: Abby Cohn, Louis Goldstein, Roger Higgins, Beth Hume, Sharon Inkelas, Junko Itô, Michael Kenstowicz, Armin Mester, Máire Ní Chiosáin and three anonymousNLLT reviewers. All mistakes are my own responsibility.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padgett, J. Stricture and nasal place assimilation. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 12, 465–513 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01118137

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01118137

Keywords

Navigation