Advertisement

African Archaeological Review

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 153–171 | Cite as

An archaeological exploration in southern Borno

  • Graham Connah
Article

Abstract

For much of the African continent archaeological fieldwork is still at an exploratory stage. There must be a great difference between the known archaeological evidence, on which we base our hypotheses, and the evidence that remains to be discovered. There must, in addition, be a veritable gulf between the archaeological evidence we have and the prehistoric human behaviour that we seek to understand. The following paper discusses recent field work in southern Borno in the light of these ideas. This fieldwork aimed to test an hypothesis about human exploitation of the area before 3000 bp but succeeded instead in revealing a substantial number of later sites in a part of an area already previously investigated by the writer. So far as earlier sites are concerned, this new fieldwork suggests that future archaeological exploration should be concentrated on the northern end of the Mandara Mountains and on the deposits at their base. The overall lesson of this fieldwork, however, seems to be that the harder you look, the more you find—although you may not find what you are looking for.

Keywords

Human Behaviour Avant Field Work Cultural Study Human Exploitation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Résumé

Presque partout en Afrique, le travail archéologique sur le terrain n'en est qu'au stade exploratoire. Il y a sans doute un grand écart entre les données archéologiques connues sur lesquelles se fondent nos hypothèses, et les faits qu'il reste à découvrir. De plus, il existe vraisemblablement un veritable gouffre entre les données archéologiques que nous possédons et le comportement humain préhistorique que nous cherchons à comprendre. Le présent article discute les recherches récentes au sud du Borno en tenant compte de ces idées. Ces travaux visaient la mise à l'essai d'une hypothèse portant sur l'exploitation humaine de la région avant 3000 ans bp mais en vint plutôt à révéler un nombre considérable de sites plus tardifs dans une aire déjà étudiée par l'auteur dans la même région. Quant aux sites de date plus éloignée, les nouveaux travaux sur le terrain suggèrent que l'exploration archéologique devrait dorénavant se concentrer sur l'extrémité nord des montagnes Mandara et sur les dépôts à leurs pieds. Il en ressort surtout, cependant, que plus on cherche, plus on découvre, bien qu'on ne trouve pas toujours ce que l'on cherchait.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bawden, M. G. 1972. Geomorphology. InThe land resources of North East Nigeria (ed. P. Tuley): vol. 1, pp. 60–70 and map 2. Surbiton.Google Scholar
  2. Connah, G. 1978. Aborigine and settler: archaeological air photography.Antiquity 52:95–99.Google Scholar
  3. Connah, G. 1981.Three thousand years in Africa: man and his environment in the Lake Chad region of Nigeria. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Connah, G. and Jemkur, J. 1982a. Prospecting the 3000 BP barrier: Borno 1981.Nyame Akuma 20:35–43.Google Scholar
  5. Connah, G. and Jemkur, J. 1982b.Borno 1981: an archaeological fieldwork tour organized by the Centre for Nigerian Cultural Studies, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, and the Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of New England, Australia. Unpublished report, Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of New England.Google Scholar
  6. Daniels, S. G. H. 1972. Research design models. InModels in archaeology (ed. D. L. Clarke): pp. 201–29. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  7. Foley, R. 1981.Off-site archaeology and human adaptation in Eastern Africa: an analysis of regional artefact density in the Amboseli, Southern Kenya. Cambridge Monographs in African Archaeology 3, BAR International Series 97, Oxford.Google Scholar
  8. Isaac, G. Ll. and Harris, J. W. K. 1980. A method for determining the characteristics of artefacts between sites in the Upper Member of the Koobi Fora Formation, East Lake Turkana. InProceedings, VIIIth Panafrican Congress of Prehistory and Quaternary Studies (eds R. E. Leakey and B. A. Ogot): pp. 19–22. Nairobi: The International Louis Leakey Memorial Institute for African Prehistory.Google Scholar
  9. Nigeria, 1969. 1:50,000 survey maps: Gwoza SW, Sheet 114 SW, Edition 1 and Gwoza SE, Sheet 114 SE, Edition 1.Google Scholar
  10. Sassoon, H. 1964. Iron-smelting in the hill village of Sukur, North-Eastern Nigeria.Man 64:174–78.Google Scholar
  11. Sullivan, S. in press. Making a discovery: the finding and reporting of Aboriginal sites. InAustralian field archaeology: a guide to techniques (ed. G. Connah) Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
  12. Thomas, D. H. 1979.Archaeology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  13. Williams, C. F. 1980.Vacuuming Mt Yarrowyck: a comprehensive survey of one stratified zone of the New England Tablelands. B.A. (Hons) Thesis, Department of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of New England.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Cambridge University Press 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Connah

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations