African Archaeological Review

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 3–25 | Cite as

The archaeological significance of animal bones from Acheulean sites in southern Africa

  • Richard G. Klein


Acheulean faunal samples from southern Africa usually contain taxa which are unknown in Upper Pleistocene or Holocene contexts and which suggest that the associated artifacts date mainly from the Middle Pleistocene or possibly the late Lower Pleistocene, between perhaps 1,000,000 and ≥130,000 years ago. Together with sedimentological evidence, the faunas also indicate that the associated Acheulean people enjoyed unusually moist conditions. There is in fact no evidence for Acheulean presence under conditions as dry as, or drier than, historic ones. The available faunas come mainly from open-air contexts where natural deaths, carnivore killing and scavenging, and possible human hunting and butchering are scrambled, and no direct inferences can be drawn about Acheulean hunting ability. However, if it is fair to extrapolate backwards from their better-documented Middle Stone Age successors, Acheulean people probably rarely, if ever, killed the large ungulates that are so common in their sites.


Cultural Study Parmi Natural Death Moist Condition Animal Bone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Parmi les ensembles de la faune acheuléenne provenant de l'Afrique du sud se trouvent souvent des taxa qui sont inconnus dans les gisements de l'âge holocène ou du pleistocène supérieur. Cette observation nous amène à suggérer que les outils associés avec cette faune datent principalement du Pleistocène moyen ou peut-être même du Pleistocène inférieur tardif, dans la période, 1,000,000 à ≥130,000 BP environ. Ces faunes, considérées conjointement avec les témoignages sédimentologiques, montrent que ces gens acheuléens ont profités d'un climat anormalement humide. A vrai dire, il n'y a aucune preuve d'une occupation acheuléenne dans des conditions aussi sèches ou plus sèches que celles de l'époque historique. La plupart des faunes dont on dispose aujourd'hui proviennent des gisements de plein-air ou les évidences de la mortalité naturelle, les restes de la proie des carnassiers, et par l'homme sont mélangées, et nous ne sommes pas permis d'en déduire des conclusions au sujet de la compétence des populations acheuléennes au niveau de la chasse. Si cependant on peut extrapoler en arrière de leurs successeurs mieux connus de l'âge de la pierre moyen, il est vraisemblable que les hommes acheuléens n'ont jamais, ou presque jamais, tués les grands ongulés dont les restes sont si nombreux dans leur sites.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Avery, D. M. 1981. Holocene micromammalian faunas from the northern Cape Province, South Africa.South African Journal of Science 77:265–73.Google Scholar
  2. Beaumont, P. B. 1980. On the age of Border Cave hominids 1–5.Palaeontologia Africana 23:21–3.Google Scholar
  3. Beaumont, P. B. 1982. Aspects of the northern Cape Pleistocene Project.Palaeoecology of Africa 15:41–4.Google Scholar
  4. Beaumont, P. B., van Zinderen Bakker, E. M. and Vogel, J. C. 1984. Environmental changes since 32000 BP at Kathu Pan, northern Cape. InLate Cainozoic Palaeoclimates of the Southern Hemisphere (ed. J. C. Vogel): pp. 329–39. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
  5. Brain, C. K. 1967. Procedures and some results in the study of Quaternary cave fillings. InBackground to Evolution in Africa (eds. W. W. Bishop and J. D. Clark): pp. 285–301. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brain, C. K. 1985. Cultural and taphonomic comparisons of hominids from Swartkrans and Sterkfontein. InAncestors: the hard evidence (ed. E. Delson): pp. 72–5. New York: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar
  7. Brain, C. K. in press. New information from the Swartkrans cave of relevance to robust australopithecines. InThe Evolutionary History of the Robust Australopithecines (ed. F. E. Grine). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  8. Butzer, K. W. 1973a. Re-evaluation of the geology of the Elandsfontein (Hopefield) site, south-western Cape, South Africa.South African Journal of Science 69:234–8.Google Scholar
  9. Butzer, K. W. 1973b. Spring sediments from the Acheulian site of Amanzi (Uitenhage District, South Africa).Quaternaria 17:299–319.Google Scholar
  10. Butzer, K. W. 1974. Geo-archaeological interpretation of Acheulian calc-pan sites at Doornlaagte and Rooidam (Kimberley, South Africa).Journal of Archaeological Science 1:1–25.Google Scholar
  11. Butzer, K. W. 1984. Archeogeology and Quarternary environment in the interior of southern Africa. InSouthern African Prehistory and Paleoenvironments (ed. R. G. Klein): pp. 1–64. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
  12. Butzer, K. W., Clark, J. D. and Cooke, H. B. S. 1974. The geology, archaeology, and fossil mammals of the Cornelia Beds, O.F.S.Memoirs of the National Museum (Bloemfontein) 9:1–84.Google Scholar
  13. Butzer, K. W., Helgren, D. M., Fock, G. J. and Stuckenrath, R. 1973. Alluvial terraces of the lower Vaal River, South Africa: a reappraisal and reinvestigation.Journal of Geology 81:341–62.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, J. D. 1970.The Prehistory of Africa. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
  15. Clarke, R. J. 1985. Early Acheulean withHomo habilis at Sterkfontein. InHominid Evolution: past, present and future (ed. P. V. Tobias): pp. 287–98. New York: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar
  16. Cooke, H. B. S. 1949. Fossil mammals of the Vaal River deposits.Geological Survey of South Africa Memoir 35(3):1–109.Google Scholar
  17. Cooke, H. B. S. 1962. Notes on the faunal material from the Cave of Hearths and Kalkbank. InPrehistory of the Transvaal (by R. J. Mason): pp. 447–53. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cooke, H. B. S. 1964. Pleistocene mammal faunas of Africa, with particular reference to southern Africa. InAfrican Ecology and Human Evolution (eds. F. C. Howell and F. Bourlière): pp. 65–116. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  19. Cooke, H. B. S. 1984. Horses, elephants and pigs as clues in the African later Cainozoic. InLate Cainozoic Palaeoclimates of the Southern Hemisphere (ed. J. C. Vogel): pp. 473–82. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
  20. Cooke, H. B. S. and Wilkinson, A. F. 1978. Suidae and Tayassuidae. InEvolution of African Mammals (eds. V. J. Maglio and H. B. S. Cooke): pp. 435–82. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Coppens, Y., Maglio, V. J., Madden, C. T. and Beden, M. 1978. Proboscidea. InEvolution of African Mammals (eds. V. J. Maglio and H. B. S. Cooke): pp. 336–67. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Deacon, H. J. 1970. The Acheulian occupation at Amanzi Springs, Uitenhage District, Cape Province.Annals of the Cape Provincial Museums 8:89–189.Google Scholar
  23. Deacon, H. J. 1975. Demography, subsistence and culture during the Acheulean in southern Africa. InAfter the Australopithecines (eds. K. W. Butzer and G. Ll. Isaac): pp. 543–69. The Hauge: Mouton.Google Scholar
  24. Deacon, H. J. 1979. Excavations at Boomplaas Cave — a sequence through the Upper Pleistocene and Holocene in South Africa.World Archaeology 10:241–57.Google Scholar
  25. Deacon, H. J. and Thackeray, J. F. 1984. Late Pleistocene environmental changes and implications for the archaeological record in southern Africa. InLate Cainozoic Palaeoclimates of the Southern Hemisphere (ed. J. C. Vogel): pp. 375–90. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
  26. Deacon, J. and Lancaster, N. J. in press.Late Quaternary Palaeoenvironments of Southern Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Drennan, M. R. 1953. The Saldanha Skull and its associations.Nature (London) 172:791.Google Scholar
  28. Drennan, M. R. 1955. The special features and status of the Saldanha Skull.American Journal of Physical Anthropology 13:625–34.Google Scholar
  29. Fock, G. J. 1968. Rooidam: a sealed site of the First Intermediate.South African Journal of Science 64:153–9.Google Scholar
  30. Goodwin, A. J. H. 1928. Archaeology of the Vaal River gravels.Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 16:77–102.Google Scholar
  31. Helgren, D. M. 1977. Geological context of the Vaal River faunas.South African Journal of Science 73:303–7.Google Scholar
  32. Helgren, D. M. 1978. Acheulian settlement along the Lower Vaal River, South Africa.Journal of Archaeological Science 5:39–60.Google Scholar
  33. Helgren, D. M. 1979. River of diamonds: an alluvial history of the Lower Vaal Basin, South Africa.University of Chicago Department of Geography Research Paper 185:1–389.Google Scholar
  34. Hendey, Q. B. 1974. The Late Cenozoic Carnivora of the south-western Cape Province.Annals of the South African Museum 63:1–369.Google Scholar
  35. Inskeep, R. R. and Hendey, Q. B. (1966). An interesting association of bones from the Elandsfontein fossil site.Actes du V e Congrès Panafricain de Préhistoire et de l'Étude du Quaternaire (ed. L. D. Cuscoy): pp. 109–124. Tenerife: Museo Arqueológico.Google Scholar
  36. Isaac, G. Ll. 1984. The archaeology of human origins: studies of the Lower Pleistocene in East Africa 1971–1981.Advances in World Archaeology 3:1–87.Google Scholar
  37. Klein, R. G. 1978. The fauna and overall interpretation of the ‘Cutting 10’ Acheulean site at Elandsfontein (Hopefield), southwestern Cape Province, South Africa.Quaternary Research 10:69–83.Google Scholar
  38. Klein, R. G. 1980. Environmental and ecological implications of large mammals from Upper Pleistocene and Holocene sites in southern Africa.Annals of the South African Museum 81:223–83.Google Scholar
  39. Klein, R. G. 1982. Patterns of ungulate mortality and ungulate mortality profiles from Langebaanweg (Early Pliocene) and Elandsfontein (Middle Pleistocene), southwestern Cape Province, South Africa.Annals of the South African Museum 90:49–94.Google Scholar
  40. Klein, R. G. 1983. Palaeoenvironmental implications of Quaternary large mammals in the fynbos region.South African National Scientific Programmes Report 75:116–38.Google Scholar
  41. Klein, R. G. 1986. Carnivore size and Quaternary climatic change in Southern Africa.Quaternary Research 26:153–70.Google Scholar
  42. Klein, R. G. and Cruz-Uribe, K. 1984.The Analysis of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Laville, H., Rigaud, J.-Ph. and Sackett, J. 1980.Rock Shelters of the Perigord. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Leakey, M. D. 1971.Olduvai Gorge Volume 3: Excavations in Beds I and II, 1960–1963. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Mabbutt, J. A. 1956. The physiography and surface geology of the Hopefield fossil site.Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa 35:21–58.Google Scholar
  46. Maglio, V. J. 1973. Origin and evolution of the Elephantidae.Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 63:1–149.Google Scholar
  47. Malan, B. D. and Cooke, H. B. S. 1941. A preliminary account of the Wonderwerk Cave, Kuruman district.South African Journal of Science 37:300–12.Google Scholar
  48. Malan, B. D. and Wells, L. H. 1943. A further report on the Wonderwerk Cave, Kuruman.South African Journal of Science 40:258–70.Google Scholar
  49. Mason, R. J. 1961. Australopithecus and the beginning of the Stone Age in South Africa.South African Archaeological Bulletin 16:8–14.Google Scholar
  50. Mason, R. J. 1962.Prehistory of the Transvaal. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Mason, R. J. 1967. Prehistory as a science of change: new research in the South African interior.Occasional Papers of the Archaeological Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand 1:1–19.Google Scholar
  52. Mason, R. J. 1976. The earliest artefact assemblages in South Africa. InLes Plus Anciennes Industries en Afrique (eds. J. D. Clark and G. Isaac): pp. 140–56. Colloque V, Union International des Sciences Préhistoriques et Protohistoriques, Nice.Google Scholar
  53. Partridge, T. C. 1982. The chronological positions of the fossil hominids of southern Africa. InL'Homo erectus et la Place de l'Homme de Tautavel parmi les Hominidés Fossiles (ed. H. de Lumley): pp. 617–75. Nice: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
  54. Partridge, T. C. and Brink, A. B. A. 1967. Gravels and terraces of the lower Vaal River basin.South African Geographical Journal 49:21–38.Google Scholar
  55. Power, J. H. 1955. Power's site, Vaal River.South African Archaeological Bulletin 10: 96–101.Google Scholar
  56. Rightmire, G. P. 1984.Homo sapiens in sub-Saharan Africa. InThe Origin of Modern Humans: a world survey of the fossil evidence (eds. F. H. Smith and F. Spencer): pp. 295–325. New York: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar
  57. Shackley, M. 1980. An Acheulean industry withElephas recki fauna from Namib IV, South West Africa (Namibia).Nature (London) 284:340–1.Google Scholar
  58. Singer, R. 1954. The Saldanha skull from Hopefield, South Africa.American Journal of Physical Anthropology 12:345–62.Google Scholar
  59. Singer, R. 1957. Investigations at the Hopefield Site. InPrehistory: Third Pan-African Congress, Livingstone 1955 (ed. J. D. Clark): pp. 175–82. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  60. Singer, R. 1958. The Rhodesian, Florisbad, and Saldanha skulls. InNeanderthal Centenary (ed. G. H. R. von Koenigswald): pp. 52–62. Köln: Böhlau-Verlag.Google Scholar
  61. Singer, R. and Crawford, J. R. 1957. The significance of the archaeological discoveries at Hopefield, South Africa.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 88:11–19.Google Scholar
  62. Singer, R. and Wymer, J. J. 1968. Archaeological investigations at the Saldanha skull site in South Africa.South African Archaeological Bulletin 25: 63–74.Google Scholar
  63. Söhnge, P. G., Visser, D. J. L. and van Riet Lowe, C. 1937. The geology and archaeology of the Vaal River basin.Geological Survey of South Africa Memoir 35:1–184.Google Scholar
  64. Stiles, D. H. and Partridge, T. C. 1979. Results of recent archaeological and palaeoenvironmental studies at the Sterkfontein Extension Site.South African Journal of Science 75:346–52.Google Scholar
  65. Thackeray, A. I., Thackeray, J. F., Beaumont, P. B. and Vogel, J. C. 1981. Dated rock engravings from Wonderwerk Cave, South Africa.Science 214:64–7.Google Scholar
  66. Thackeray, J. F. 1984. Climatic change and mammalian fauna from the Holocene deposits at Wonderwerk Cave, northern Cape. InLate Cainozoic Palaeoclimates of the Southern Hemisphere (ed. J. C. Vogel): pp. 371–4. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
  67. Tobias, P. V. 1968. Middle and Early Upper Pleistocene members of the genusHomo in Africa. InEvolution und Hominisation (ed. G. Kurth): pp. 176–94. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  68. Tobias, P. V. 1971. Human skeletal remains from the Cave of Hearths, Makapansgat, northern Transvaal.American Journal of Physical Anthropology 34:335–68.Google Scholar
  69. Tuffreau, A. 1979. Les débuts du paléolithique moyen dans la France septentrionale.Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 76:140–2.Google Scholar
  70. van Riet Lowe, C. 1952. The Vaal River chronology — an up-to-date summary.South African Archaeological Bulletin 7:135–49.Google Scholar
  71. van Zinderen Bakker, E. M. 1982. Pollen analytical studies of the Wonderwerk Cave, South Africa.Pollen et Spores 24: 235–50.Google Scholar
  72. Vogel, J. C. and Beaumont, P. B. 1972. Revised radiocarbon chronology for the Stone Age in southern Africa.Nature (London) 237:50–1.Google Scholar
  73. Volman, T. P. 1984. Early prehistory of southern Africa. InSouthern African Prehistory and Paleoenvironments (ed. R. G. Klein): pp. 159–220. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkerma.Google Scholar
  74. Wells, L. H. 1964. The Vaal River Younger Gravels faunal assemblage: a revised list.South African Journal of Science 60:91–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Cambridge University Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard G. Klein

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations