African Archaeological Review

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 189–208 | Cite as

Ethnoarchaeology: the search for a self-corrective approach to the study of past human behaviour

  • E. Kofi Agorsah


This paper examines current trends in ethnoarchaeological studies and their implications for the interpretation of evidence from Africa and ‘Third World’ areas generally. Significant emerging issues related to data collection, analysis, use of analogy, the concept of ethnicity or group identification, settlement pattern analysis, cultural adaptation and continuity are addressed. Using examples from research in Africa the paper calls for a redefinition of ethnoarchaeology in a fashion that identifies its two-face nature as well as the theoretical and methodological orientations that provide results which go beyond mere collections and description of data. Crucial issues related to various stages and aspects of ethnoarchaeological research procedure are discussed in order to demonstrate the importance of a systematic use of ethnoarchaeological data that provides checks and balances leading to a more objective interpretation of archaeological data. Ethnoarchaeology should not be considered as an end in itself but as one of the many tools which can be used to refine our explanation for understanding of past human behaviour.


Pattern Analysis Group Identification Crucial Issue Settlement Pattern Cultural Adaptation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Cet article examine les tendances actuelles de l'ethnoarchéologie ainsi que leur portée pour l'interprétation des données en provenance d'Afrique et plus généralement d'autres pays du Tiers Monde. Les problèmes liés à la manière dont les données ont été rassemblées, analysées, l'utilisation d'analogies, le concept d'ethnicité ou d'identification d'un groupe, l'analyse des modes d'occupation de l'espace, l'adaptation culturelle et la continuité sont discutés.

Utilisant des exemples tirés de recherches faites en Afrique, l'article plaide pour une redéfinition de l'ethnoarchéologie de façon à ce que soit mise en évidence sa double nature ainsi que les orientations théoriques et méthodologiques qui en découlent et qui produisent des résultats dépassant la simple récolte et description des données. Les problèmes cruciaux relatifs aux différents étapes et aspects de la recherche ethnoarchéologique sont discutés de façon à montrer l'importance d'une utilisation systématique des données ethnoarchéologiques qui permettent des vérifications et des réajustements menant à une interprétation plus objective des données archéologiques.

L'ethnoarchéologie ne doit pas être considérée comme une fin en elle-même, mais comme un outil, parmi bien d'autres, qui peut être utilisé pour affiner notre compréhension des comportements humains du passé.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agorsah, E. K. 1983.An Ethnoarchaeological Study of Settlement and Behaviour Patterns of a West African Traditional Society: the Nchumuru of Ghana. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  2. Agorsah, E. K. 1985. Archaeological implications of traditional house construction among the Nchumuru of northern Ghana.C.A. 26:103–15.Google Scholar
  3. Agorsah, E. K. 1986a. Settlement pattern analysis in the Northern Volta Basin.Volta Basin Archaeological Research Project Report for1983–5. Legon: University of Ghana.Google Scholar
  4. Agorsah, E. K. 1986b. The internal spatial organization of traditional houses in the Northern Volta Basin of Ghana.Legon Research Review (New Series) 2:104–34.Google Scholar
  5. Agorsah, E. K. 1987. Volta Basin Research Project 1984–85.N.A. 28:11–14.Google Scholar
  6. Agorsah, E. K. 1988a. The settlement history of the Northern Volta Basin of Ghana.National Geographic Research 4:371–85.Google Scholar
  7. Agorsah, E. K. 1988b. Evaluating spatial behaviour patterns of pre-historic societies.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 7:231–47.Google Scholar
  8. Anquandah, J. R. 1985.Ethnoarchaeological Clues to Ghana's Great Past and a Greater Future (a public lecture). Legon: University of Ghana Department of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  9. Ascher, R. 1961. Analogy in archaeological interpretation.Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 17:317–25.Google Scholar
  10. Atherton, J. H. 1972. Protohistoric habitation sites in northeastern Sierra Leone,Bull. Soc. Roy Belge d'Anth. et de Préhist. 83:5–17.Google Scholar
  11. Atherton, J. H. 1983. Ethnoarchaeology in Africa.A.A.R. 1:75–104.Google Scholar
  12. Binford, L. R. 1968a. Methodological considerations of the archaeological use of ethnographic data. InMan the Hunter (eds R. Lee and I. De Vore): pp. 268–73, Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  13. Binford, L. R. 1968b. Archaeological perspectives. InNew Perspectives in Archaeology (eds S. R. Binford and L. R. Binford): pp. 5–32. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  14. Binford, L. R. 1972.An Archaeological Perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Binford, L. R. 1983.Working at Archaeology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Binford, L. R. and Sabloff, J. A. 1982. Paradigms, systematics and archaeology.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 38:137–53.Google Scholar
  17. Boas, F. 1940.Race, Language and Culture. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, R. 1963.Explanation in Social Science. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  19. Callagher, J. P. 1973. The ethnographic use of stone tools in South-Central Ethiopia.N.A. 3:18.Google Scholar
  20. Campbell, J. M. 1968. Territoriality among ancient hunters: interpretations from ethnography and nature. InAnthropological Archaeology in the Americas (ed. B. J. Meggers): pp. 1–21. Washington: Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
  21. Clark, J. D. 1973. Plant food in prehistory: a possible basis for model building.N.A. 3:14.Google Scholar
  22. Clark, J. D. 1981.Tools and Ourselves: an African legacy (seventeenth Raymond Dart Lecture). Johannesburg: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
  23. Clark, J. D. and Kurashina, H. I. 1981. a study of modern tannery in Ethiopia and its relevance for archaeological interpretation. InModern Material Culture: the archaeology of US (eds R. Gould and M. Schiffer): pp. 303–21. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Cohen, A. 1969.Customs and politics in Urban Africa. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. David, N. 1971. The Fulani compound and the archaeologist.W.A. 3:111–31.Google Scholar
  26. DeCorse, C. 1988. Material aspects of Limba, Yalunka and Kuranko ethnicity: archaeological research in northeastern Sierra Leone. InArchaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity (ed. S. J. Shennan): pp. 125–40. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  27. Donnan, C. B. and Clewlow, C. W. (eds) 1974.Ethnoarchaeology. Los Angeles: University of California Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  28. Du Toit, B. M. (ed.) 1978.Ethnicity in Modern Africa. Boulder (Colorado): Westview Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fewkes, J. W. 1893. A-wa-to-bi: an archaeological verification of a Tuseyan legend.American Anthropologist 6:363–75.Google Scholar
  30. Freeman, L. G. 1968. A theoretical framework for interpreting archaeological materials. InMan the Hunter (eds R. Lee and I. De Vore): pp. 262–67. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  31. Freide, H. M. and Steel, R. H. 1977. An experimental study of iron-smelting techniques in the South African Iron Age.Journal of South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy 77:233–42.Google Scholar
  32. Gifford, D. 1978. Ethnoarchaeological observations of natural processes affecting cultural materials. InExplorations in Ethnoarchaeology (ed. R. Gould): pp. 71–101. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gould, R. 1974. Some current problems in ethnoarchaeology.Ethnoarchaeology (monograph 4) (eds C. B., Donnan and C. W. Clewlow): pp. 29–48. Los Angeles: University of California Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  34. Gould, R. 1980.Living Archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Gould, R. 1985. The empiricist strikes back: reply to Binford.American Antiquity 50:638–44.Google Scholar
  36. Gould, R. and Watson, P. J. 1982. A dialogue on the meaning and use of analogy in ethnoarchaeological reasoning.Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1:355–81.Google Scholar
  37. Hannerz, N. G. L. 1974. Ethnicity and opportunity in urban America. InUrban Ethnicity (ed. A. Cohen): pp. 37–76. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  38. Harlan, J. R., De Wet, J. M. J. and Stemler, A. B. L. (eds) 1976.Origins of African Plant Domestication. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  39. Herbert, E. W. and Goucher, C. 1987.The Blooms of Banjeli: technology and gender in West African iron-making. Watertown.Google Scholar
  40. Hill, J. 1968. Broken K Pueblo: patterns of form and function. InNew Perspectives in Archaeology (eds S. R. Binford and L. R. Binford): pp. 193–242. Chicago: Aldene.Google Scholar
  41. Hodder, I. (ed.) 1978.Spatial Organization of Culture. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  42. Hodder, I. (ed.) 1982.Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hodder, I. 1983.The Present Past: an introduction to anthropology for archaeologists. New York: Pica Press.Google Scholar
  44. Horako, R. 1976. The Mbuti as hunters.African Study Monographs (Kyoto University) 10:37–99.Google Scholar
  45. Ichikawa, M. 1978. The residential groups of the Mbuti pygmies.Senri Ethnoarchaeological Studies 1:131–88.Google Scholar
  46. Ingersoll, D., Yellen, J. E. and McDonald, W. 1977.Experimental Archaeology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Jochim, M. A. 1976.Hunter-Gatherer Subsistence and Settlement: a predictive model. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Johnson, S.Rev. 1937.History of the Yoruba. Lagos.Google Scholar
  49. Keeley, L. H. 1980.Experimental Determination of Stone Tool Uses: a microwear analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  50. Kent, S. 1984.Analyzing Activity Areas, an ethnoarchaeological study of the use of space. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  51. Ki-Zerbo, J. (ed.) 1981.UNESCO General History of Africa, I, Methodology and African Prehistory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  52. Kluckhohn, C. 1939. The place of theory in anthropological studies.Journal of the Philosophy of Science 6:328–44.Google Scholar
  53. Kramer, C. (ed.) 1979.Ethnoarchaeology: implications of ethnography for archaeology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kroeber, A. L. 1916. Zuni potsherds.Anthropological Papers, Museum of Natural History 18:1–37.Google Scholar
  55. Lee, R. B. 1968. What hunters do for a living. InMan the Hunter (eds R. B. Lee and I. De Vore): pp. 30–48. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  56. Lee, R. B. and De Vore, I. (eds) 1968.Man the Hunter. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  57. Leone, M. P. 1972.Contemporary Archaeology. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Lubell, D. and Gautier, A. 1973. The prehistoric cultural ecology of Capsianescargottières: initial results.N.A. 3:27.Google Scholar
  59. Mazrui, A. 1978. Ethnic tensions and political stratification in Uganda. InEthnicity in Modern Africa (ed. B. M. Du Toit). Boulder (Colorado): Westview Press.Google Scholar
  60. McIntosh, R. C. 1974. Archaeology and mudwall decay in a West African village.W.A. 6:154–71.Google Scholar
  61. McIntosh, R. C. 1977. The excavation of mud structures: an experiment from West Africa.W.A. 9:185–99.Google Scholar
  62. Meehan, E. 1968.Explanation in Social Science: a systems paradigm. Honewood (Illinois): Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
  63. Merton, R. K. 1957.Social Theory and Social Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. Mills, G. 1985. An inquiry into the structure and function of settlement space in northern Namibia.Architecture (Cape Town). Jan.–Feb.:33–4; March–April:46–53; May–June:57–60.Google Scholar
  65. Netting, R. M. 1965. Household organization and intensive agriculture: the Kofyar case.Africa 35: 422–8.Google Scholar
  66. Netting, R. M. 1969. Ecosystem in process: a comparative study of change in two West African societies.National Museum of Canada Bulletin 230:102–12.Google Scholar
  67. Newman, J. L. 1978. Place and ethnicity among the Sandawe of Tanzania,Ethnicity in Modern Africa (ed. B. M. Du Toit): pp. 105–22. Boulder (Colorado): Westview Press.Google Scholar
  68. Orme, B. 1973. Archaeology and ethnography. InThe Explanation of Culture Change: models in prehistory (ed. C. Renfrew): pp. 481–92. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  69. Orme, B. 1974. Twentieth-century prehistorian and the idea of ethnographic parallels.Man (NS) 9:199–212.Google Scholar
  70. Orme, B. 1981.Anthropology for Archaeologists: an introduction. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Oswalt, W. H. 1974. Ethnoarchaeology.Ethnoarchaeology (monograph 4) (eds) C. B. Donnan and C. W. Clewlow). Los Angeles: University of California Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  72. Phillipson, D. W. 1985.African Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Posnansky, M. 1982. African archaeology comes of age.W.A. 13:345–58.Google Scholar
  74. Rappapport, R. A. 1968.Pigs for the Ancestors. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Salmon, H. 1967. The foundations of scientific inference: ‘deductive’ vs. ‘inductive’ archaeology.American Antiquity 41:376–81.Google Scholar
  76. Sapir, E. 1916. Time perspective in aboriginal American culture: a study in method.Canada Department of Mines: Geology Survey Memoir 90.Google Scholar
  77. Sarevkaja, B. I. 1964. La methode de l'ethnographie de Marcel Griaule et les questions de methodologie dans d'ethnographie française contemporaine.Cahiers Etudes Africaines 16:590–602.Google Scholar
  78. Schiffer, M. B. 1978. Methodological issues in ethnoarchaeology. InExplorations in Ethnoarchaeology (ed. R. Gould): pp. 229–47. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  79. Schiffer, M. B. 1987. Theory and experiments in the study of technological change.C.A. 28:595–622.Google Scholar
  80. Schiffer, M. B., Baron, A., Cortes, P. and Sepulveda, J. 1987. Deterioration of adobe structures: a case study from San Pedro de Atacaina, northern Chile. InNatural Formation Processes and the Archaeological Record (eds D. T. Nash and M. D. Petraglia): pp. 10–29. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
  81. Schildkrout, E. 1974. Ethnicity and generational differences among urban immigrants in Ghana. InUrban Ethnicity (ed. A. Cohen): pp. 187–222. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  82. Schmidt, P. and Avery, D. 1978. Complex iron smelting and prehistoric culture in Tanzania.Science 201:1085–9.Google Scholar
  83. Schmidt, P. and Avery, D. 1979. A metallurgical study of iron bloomery as practised among the Buhaya.Journal of Metals 31:14–20.Google Scholar
  84. Shiner, J. L. 1973. Wear patterns on stone tools.N.A. 3:32.Google Scholar
  85. Sinclair, P. J. J. 1987.Space, Time and Social Formation: a territorial approach to the archaeology and anthropology of Zimbabwe and Mozambique c. 0–700 AD. Uppsala: Societas Archaeologica Upsalensis.Google Scholar
  86. Sinclair, P. J. J. and Lundmark, H. 1984. A spatial analysis of archaeological sites from Zimbabwe. InFrontiers: southern African archaeology today (eds M. Hallet al.): pp. 277–88. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.Google Scholar
  87. Sjoberg, G. and Nett, R. 1968.A Methodology for Social Research. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  88. Smart, J. J. C. 1963.Philosophy and Scientific Realism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Smith, M. A. 1955. The limitations of inference in archaeology.The Archaeological Newsletter 6:1–7.Google Scholar
  90. Stanislawski, M. B. 1974. The relationships of ethnoarchaeology, traditional and systems archaeology.Ethnoarchaeology (monograph 4) (eds C. B. Donnan and C. W. Clewlow). Los Angeles: University of California Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar
  91. Stiles, D. 1977. Ethnoarchaeology: a discussion of methods and applications.Man (NS) 2:87–103.Google Scholar
  92. Tanno, T. 1976. The Mbuti net hunters in the Ituri forest, eastern Zaïre.African Study Monographs (Kyoto University) 10:101–246.Google Scholar
  93. Thompson, R. 1956. The subjective element in archaeological inference.Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 12:327–32.Google Scholar
  94. Toth, N. 1982. Use-wear polish workshop. Paper presented at the meeting of Society of Africanist Archaeologists in America, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  95. Tuggle, D., Townsend, A. H. and Riley, T. 1972. Laws Systems and Research Design.American Antiquity 37:3–12.Google Scholar
  96. Turnbull, C. 1965. The Mbutu pygmies: an ethnographic survey.Anthropology Papers 50. New York: American Museum of National History.Google Scholar
  97. Ucko, P. J. 1969. Ethnography and archaeological interpretation of funerary remains.W.A. 1:262–80.Google Scholar
  98. van der Merwe, N. J. and Scully, R. T. K. 1971. The Phalaborwa story: archaeological and ethnographic investigation of a South African Iron Age group.W.A. 3: 178–96.Google Scholar
  99. von Bertalamfy, L. 1962.Modern Theories of Development. New York.Google Scholar
  100. Watson, P. J. 1971.Explanation in Archaeology: an explicitly scientific approach. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Wilmsen, E. N. 1979. Diet and fertility among Kalahari Bushmen.Boston University African Studies Center Working Paper 14.Google Scholar
  102. Wylie, A. 1985. The reaction against analogy. InAdvances in Archaeological Method and Theory (ed. M. B. Schiffer): pp. 63–71. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  103. Yellen, J. E. 1976. Settlement patterns of !Kung. InKalahari Hunter-Gatherers: studies of the !Kung-San and their neighbours. (eds R. B. Lee and I. De Vore): pp. 42–7. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Yellen, J. E. 1977.Archaeological Approaches to the Present: models for reconstructing the past. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Cambridge University Press 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Kofi Agorsah

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations