Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Secularization and the politics of traditionalism: The case of the right-to-life movement

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

Research on the traditionalist movement against abortion needs alignment with currents in historical sociology, the theory of social movements and the sociology of politics. The religious (specifically, Christian) basis of the right-to-life movement has attracted considerable attention in the literature. The movement is seen as a traditionalist bloc claiming to oppose secularization and return to customary restrictions. However the “tradition” in question appears to be a recent social construction. There is slim warrant in the actual traditions of Western religion for asserting a categorical right to life. As a result, the movement's ideology is best approached as the product of—rather than the antidote to—secularizing processes (including the demographic transition, discourse about rights, markets for symbolic entrepreneurs and the separation of church and state) and possibly as an unintended import from non-Western religion. Implications for traditionalism, the functions of religion, and the study of countermovements are explored. This case illustrates the value of attending to historical sequences and the external cultural environments of social movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abercrombie, N., S. Hill andB. Turner 1980 The Dominant Ideology Thesis. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allardt, E. 1981 “Changes in the nature of ethnicity: From the primordial to the organizational.” In M. Attir, B. Holzner and Z. Suda (eds.), Directions of Change: 75–119. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1962 Centuries of Childhood. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1972 “On the origins of contraception in France.” In O. Ranum and P. Ranum (eds.), Popular Attitudes Toward Birth Control in Preindustrial France and England: 10–20. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arney, W. R. andW. H. Trescher 1976 “Trends in attitudes toward abortion, 1972–1975.” Family Planning Perspectives 8:117–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basham, A. L. 1954 The Wonder That Was India. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, W. 1971 Orthodoxy and Heresy in Early Christianity. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1964 “Religious evolution.” American Sociological Review 24:358–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1967 “Civil religion in America.” Daedalus 96:1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergel, G. 1984 Abortion in America. Toronto: Life Cycle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1967 The Sacred Canopy. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1973 “On the obsolescence of the concept of honor.” In P. Berger, B. Berger and H. Kellner, The Homeless Mind:83–96. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. andT. Luckmann 1966 The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. N. 1971 “Abortion and public opinion: The 1960–1970 decade.” Science 171:540–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. N. andJ. H. del Pinal 1981 “Negativism, equivocation, and wobbly assent: Public ‘support’ for the prochoice platform on abortion.” Demography 18:309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1978 “The people's faith in Europe and America: Four centuries in review.” Journal of Social History 12:817–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. J. 1983 “The radicalism of tradition: Community strength or venerable disguise and borrowed language?” American Journal of Sociology 88:886–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. 1970 Abortion: Law, Choice, and Morality. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, M. A. 1985 “Scientific creationism and rationality.” Nature 315:185–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, R. R. andW. L. Tolone 1973 “Religiosity and attitudes toward induced abortion: An elaboration of the relationship.” Sociological Analysis 34:26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, E. 1974 “L'Infanticide dans le Haut Moyen Age.” Annales Economies, Societes et Civilisations 29:315–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cott, N. 1978 In the Bonds of Womanhood. New Haven, CT: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, N. Z. 1975 Society and Culture in Early Modern France. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delasselle, C. 1978 “Abandoned children in eighteenth-century Paris.” In E. Forster and O. Ranum (eds.), Deviants and the Abandoned in French Society:47–110. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1961 The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: Collier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinan, R. 1967 “The inviolability of the right to be born.” In D. Smith (ed.), Abortion and the Law:107–123. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuerbach, L. 1957 The Essence of Christianity. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finner, S. L. andJ. D. Gamache 1969 “The relationship between religious commitment and attitudes toward induced abortion.” Sociological Analysis 30:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. 1975 The Politics of Women's Liberation. New York: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galpern, A. N. 1976 The Religions of the People in Sixteenth-Century Champagne. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1968 Islam Observed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1973 The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1970 “Concepts and society.” In B. Wilson (ed.), Rationality:18–49. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1973 Legitimation of Belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. 1970 The Coming Crisis of American Sociology. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1976 The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology. New York: Seabury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granberg, D. 1978 “Pro-life or reflection of conservative ideology? An analysis of opposition to legalized abortion.” Sociology and Social Research 62:414–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greven, P. 1977 The Protestant Temperament. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. 1967 “Commentary.” In D. Smith (ed.), Abortion and the Law:224–234. Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. 1974 “Abortion law reform: The English experience.” In R. Perkins (ed.), Abortion: Pro and Con. Cambridge, MA: Shenckman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heimer, D. 1976 “Abortion attitudes among Catholic university students: A comparative research note.” Sociological Analysis 37:255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herberg, W. 1960 Protestant, Catholic, Jew. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, D. 1977 “The movement to legalize abortion: An historical account.” In D. Greenberg (ed.), Corrections and Punishment:205–226. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. D. 1983 American Evangelicalism. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, F. 1981 Abortion Politics: Private Morality and Public Policy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. andM. Joyce 1970 Let Us Be Born. Chicago: Franciscan Herald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellum, B. 1974 “Infanticide in England in the later Middle Ages.” History of Childhood Quarterly 1:367–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. 1984 “Catholicism and modern memory.” sociological Analysis 45:131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koop, C. E. 1984 “The slide to Auschwitz.” In R. Reagan, Abortion and the Conscience of a Nation:41–73. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausz, M. andJ. Meiland, eds. 1982 Relativism: Cognitive and Moral. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1966 Abortion. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1973 Abortion II: Making the Revolution. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, W. L. 1974 “Infanticide: An historical survey.” History of Childhood Quarterly 1:353–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeRoy Ladurie, E. 1978 Montaillou: The Promised Land of Error. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, C. Y. H. 1982 “Countermovements and conservative movements in the contemporary U.S.” Annual Review of Sociology 8:107–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luker, K. 1984 Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, W. andJ. Alston 1977 “Acceptance of abortion among white Catholics and Protestants, 1962 and 1975.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 16:295–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, W., L. Alston andJ. Alston 1979 “The differential impact of religious preference and church attendance on attitudes toward abortion.” Review of Religious Research 20:195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1966 A Short History of Ethics. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1967 Secularization and Moral Change. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1970 “Is understanding religion compatible with believing?” In B. Wilson (ed.), Rationality:62–77. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 “Epistemological crises, dramatic narratives, and the philosophy of science.” In G. Gutting (ed.), Paradigms and Revolutions:54–75. South Bend, IN:Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981 After Virtue. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannheim, K. 1936 Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, G. 1980 Fundamentalism and American Culture. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. 1950 Citizenship and Social Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, M. 1985 “Transpositions: American religion in the 1980s.” Annals 480:11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1982 The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, S. 1967 “The nation with the soul of a church.” Church History 36:1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1970 “A historian's view.” In R. Hall (ed.), Abortion in a Changing World:16–24. New York: Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1971 “The phoenix of abortional freedom: Is a penumbral or ninth-amendment right about to arise from the legislative ashes of a fourteenth-century common-law liberty?” New York Law Forum 17:335–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, A. 1981 Enemies of Choice: The Right to Life Movement and Its Threat to Abortion. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. L. 1964 Piety Along the Potomac. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J. 1978 Abortion in America: The Origin and Evolution of National Policy, 1800–1900. New York: Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottl, T. 1980 “The analysis of countermovements.” Social Problems 27:620–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouly, R. 1982 “Israel: Darling of the religious right.” Humanist 42(May):5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muggeridge, M. 1984 “The humane holocaust.” In R. Reagan, Abortion and the Conscience of a Nation:75–95. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neitz, M. J. 1981 “Family, state and god: Ideology of the right to life movement.” Sociological Analysis 42:265–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D. 1982 The Creation Controversy. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, H. R. 1951 Christ and Culture. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1965 Contraception. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1967 “The Catholic church and abortion.” Dublin Review 514:300–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1972 “An almost absolute value in history.” In Noonan (ed.), The Morality of Abortion:1–59. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagels, E. 1980 The Agnostic Gospels. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paige, J. 1975 Agrarian revolution. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1937 The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1968 “Christianity.” In D. Sills (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 2:425–447. New York: Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrenoud, A. 1974 “Malthusianisme et protestnatisme: 'un modele demographic weberien'.” Annales Economies, Societes et Civilisations 29:975–988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, L. R. andA. L. Mauss 1976 “Religion and the ‘right to life’: Correlates of opposition to abortion.” Sociological Analysis 37:243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. 1963 Conjectures and Refutations. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shils, E. 1981 Tradition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorter, E. 1977 The Making of the Modern Family. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smidt, C. andJ. Penning 1982 “Religious commitment, political conservativism, and social tolerance in the U.S.: A longitudinal analysis.” Sociological Analysis 43:231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snare, F. 1977 “Three sceptical theses in ethics.” American Philosophical Quarterly 14:129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhoff, P. andM. Diamond 1977 Abortion Politics: The Hawaii Experience. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, L. 1979 The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedrow, L. M. andE. R. Mahoney 1979 “Trends in attitudes toward abortion: 1972–1976.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43:181–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. 1971 “The moral economy of the English crowd.” Past and Present 50:76–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1978 From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 “Repertoires of contention in Britain and America, 1750–1830.” In M. Zald and J. McCarthy (eds.), The Dynamics of Social Movements:126–155. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevor-Roper, H. R. 1967 The European Witch-Craze of the Seventeenth Century. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. 1969 “The theme of contemporary social movements.” British Journal of Sociology 20:390–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijhof, P. andJ. Waardenburg, eds. 1979 Official and Popular Religion. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. 1965 The Revolution of the Saints. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1946 From Max Weber. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1954 Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1963 The Sociology of Religion. Boston, MA: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, Dr. J. andMrs. J. Willke 1975 Handbook on Abortion. Cincinnati, OH: Hayes Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B.R. 1982 Religion in Sociological Perspective. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. 1973 “Religious commitment and conservatism: In search of an elusive relationship.” In C. Glock (ed.), Religion in Sociological Perspective: 117–132. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, USA

    Michael A. Cavanaugh

Authors
  1. Michael A. Cavanaugh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cavanaugh, M.A. Secularization and the politics of traditionalism: The case of the right-to-life movement. Sociol Forum 1, 251–283 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115739

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115739

Keywords

Search

Navigation