Abstract
A program of research on the formal representation and analysis of institutional structures is taken a step further by integrating it with recent developments in the formal representation of hierarchical levels of inclusion or part-whole relations. We begin by reviewing a cybernetic conception of action and show how this relates to the construction of production system models of institutional structures. Thereafter, we treat the inclusion hierarchy to show how the production rule constitutes the conceptual unit integrating social knowledge and social action upon which are built two hierarchies, involving institutional entities and social networks, respectively. We indicate some of the detailed forms of control involved in these hierarchies and then show how a form of functional analysis can be undertaken on this basis. Finally, we provide a lengthy discussion of the promise and problems of this mode of structural analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Axten, N. andT.J. Fararo 1977 “The information processing representation of institutionalised social action.” In P. Krishnan (ed.), Mathematical Models of Sociology. Sociological Review Monograph 24. Keele, UK: University of Keele.
Axten, N. andJ. Skvoretz 1980 “Roles and role-programs.” Quality and Quantity 14:547–583.
Bates, F. L. andC. C. Harvey 1975 The Structure of Social Systems. New York: Gardner Press.
Berger, P. andT. Luckmann 1966 The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.
Boudon, R. 1982 The Unintended Consequences of Social Action. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Breiger, R. L. 1974 “The duality of persons and groups.” Social Forces 53:181–190.
Chomsky, N. andG. A. Miller 1963 “An introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages.” In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush and E. Galanter (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Wiley.
Engelfriet, J. 1974 Simple Program Schemes and Formal Languages. Lectures Notes in Computer Science: 20. New York: Springer-Verlag.
1978 “An introduction to catastrophes.” Behavioral Science 23:291–317.
1981 “Social activity and social structure: A contribution to the theory of social systems.” Cybernetics and Systems 12:53–81.
Fararo, T. J. andP. Doreian 1984 “Tripartite structural analysis: Generalizing the Breiger-Wilson formalism.” Social Networks 6:141–175.
Fararo, T. J. andJ. Skvoretz 1984 “Institutions as production systems.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 10:117–181.
Freeman, L. 1984 “Turning a profit from mathematics: The case of social networks.” In T. Fararo (ed.), Mathematical Ideas and Sociological Theory, New York: Gordon and Breach.
Garfinkel, H. 1967 Studies in Ethnomethology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gray, L. N. andM. H. van Broembson 1974 “On simple stochastic models of diffusion.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 2:121–130.
Heise, D. R. 1979 Understanding Events: Affect and the Construction of Social Action. ASA Rose Monograph. New York: Cambridge University Press.
1950 The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
1974 Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, rev. ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Hopcroft, J. andJ. Ullman 1969 Formal Languages and Their Relation to Automata. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
Labov, W. andD. Fanshel 1977 Therapeutic Discourse. New York: Academic Press.
Levi-Strauss, C. 1963 Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
Lidz, C. W. 1984 “Requisites for a model of institutionalized normative structures.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 10(2):191–197.
1968 Social Theory and Social Structure, enlarged ed.:424–438. New York: The Free Press
1976 Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays. New York: The Free Press.
Meyer, J. 1977 “The effects of education as an institution”. American Journal of Sociology 83(1):55–77.
Miller, G. A., E. Galanter andK. H. Pibram 1960 Plans and the Structure of Behavior. New York: Holt.
1951 The Foundations of Social Anthropology. New York: Free Press.
1957 The Theory of Social Structure. London: Cohen and West.
Nemeth, R. J. andD. A. Smith 1985 “International trade and world-systems structure: A multiple network analysis.” Review 7:517–560.
Newell, A. andH. A. Simon 1972 Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nilsson, J. R. 1977 Principles of Artificial Intelligence. Palo Alto, CA: Tioga.
1951 The Social System. New York: The Free Press.
1960 “The pattern variables revisited.” American Sociological Review 25(4):467–483.
Parsons, T. andN. Smelser 1956 Economy and Society. New York: The Free Press.
Powers, W. T. 1973 Behavior: The Control of Perception. Chicago: Aldine.
Sampson, S. F. 1969 Crisis in a Cloister. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University.
Schank, R. C. andP. Abelson 1977 Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
1978 “Information diffusion in formally structured populations: An information processing approach.” Journal of Cybernetics (now Cybernetics and Systems) 8:51–82.
1984 “Languages and grammars of action and interaction: Some further results.” Behavioral Science 29(2):81–97.
1980 “Languages and grammars of action and interaction: A contribution to the formal theory of action.” Behavioral Science 25:9–22.
1984 “Issues in institution representation: Reply to the commentaries.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 10:211–218.
Skvoretz, J., T. J. Fararo andN. Axten 1980 “Role programme models and the analysis of institutional structure.” Sociology 14:49–67.
Wagner, D. G. 1984 The Growth of Sociological Theories. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Winston, P. H. 1977 Artificial Intelligence, 2d ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Wilson, T. P. 1982 “Relational networks: An extension of sociometric concepts.” Social Networks 4:105–116.
Zelditch, M., Jr. 1984 “Meaning, conformity, and control.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 10:183–190.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fararo, T.J., Skvoretz, J. Action and institution, network and function: The cybernetic concept of social structure. Sociol Forum 1, 219–250 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115738
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115738