Skip to main content

Predatory, developmental, and other apparatuses: A comparative political economy perspective on the Third World state

Sociological Forum volume 4, pages 561–587 (1989)Cite this article

Abstract

Disappointment over the contributions of Third World state apparatuses to industrial transformation and the increasing intellectual dominance of “neoutiliarian” paradigms in the social science has made if fashionable to castigate the Third World state as “predatory” and “rent seeking.” This paper argues for a more differentiated view, one that connects differences in performance to differences in state structure. The “incoherent absolutist domination” of the “klepto-patrimonial” Zairian state are contrasted to the “embedded autonomy” of the East Asian developmental state. Then the internal structure and external ties of an intermediate state — Brazil — are analyzed in relation to both polar types. The comparative evidence suggests that the efficacy of the developmental state depends on a meritocratic bureaucracy with a strong sense of corporate identity and a dense set of institutionalized links to private elites.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Abranches, Sergio 1978 “The divided leviathan: The state and economic policy making in authoritarian Brazil.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, Cornell University.

  • 1985 “The state and Taiwan's economic development.” In Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol (eds.), Bringing the State Back In: 78–106. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 “Taiwan's economic history: A case of estatisme and a challenge to dependency theory.” Modern China 5(3):341–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auster, Richard D. andMorris Silver 1979 The State as Firm: Economic Forces in Political Development. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, Werner 1969 The Development of the Brazilian Steel Industry. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, Pranab 1984 The Political Economy of Development in India. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzelay, Michael 1986 The Politicized Market Economy: Alcohol in Brazil's Energy Strategy. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M., Robert D. Tollison, andGordon Tullock, eds. 1980 Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society. College Station, TX: Texas A & M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghy, Thomas 1984 The State-Society Struggle: Zaire in Comparative Perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, Fernando Henrique 1975 Autoritarismo e Democratizacao. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Paz e Terra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Tun-jen 1987 “The politics of industrial transformation: The case of the East Asia NICs.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Byung Sun 1987 “Institutionalizing a liberal economic order in Korea: The strategic management of economic change.” Ph.D. dissertation, Kennedy School, Harvard University.

  • Colander, David C., ed. 1984 Neoclassical Political Economy: An Analysis of Rent-seeking and DUP Activities. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumings, Bruce 1987 “The origins and development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial sectors, product cycles and political consequences.” In F. Deyo (ed.), The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism: 44–83. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deyo, Frederic, ed. 1987 The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 “Class, state and dependence in East Asia: Some lessons for Latin Americanists.” In F. Deyo (ed.), The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982 “Reinventing the bourgeoisie: State entrepreneurship and class formation in dependent capitalist development.” American Journal of Sociology 88:S210-S247.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981 “Collectivized capitalism: Integrated petrochemical complexes and capital accumulation in Brazil.” In Thomas C Bruneau and Philippe Faucher (eds.), Authoritarian Brazil. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State and Local Capital in Brazil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceddes, Barbara 1986 Economic Development as a Collective Action Problem: Individual Interests and Innovation in Brazil. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, Alexander 1962 Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, Tom 1986 State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle. New York: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, David 1979 “The administration of underdevelopment.” In Guy Gran (ed.), Zaire: The Political Economy of Underdevelopment: 87–107. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark 1985 “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, Frances 1986 “The politics of oligarchy: The persistence of traditional elites in contemporary Brazil.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert 1989 “Reactionary rhetoric.” The Atlantic Monthly, May:63–70.

  • 1958 The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, Galen 1979 “Zaire in the world system: In search of sovereignty.” In Guy Gran (ed), Zaire: The Political Economy of Underdevelopment: 263–283. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Chalmers 1982 MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925–1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Leroy, andIl Sakong 1980 Government, Business and Entrepreneurship in Economic Development: The Korean Case. Studies in Modernization of the Korean Republic, 1945–1975. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland and the Politics of Industry. Ithaca, NY: Connell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985 Small states in world markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Connell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killick, Tony 1986 “A reaction too far: Contemporary thinking about the economic role of the state, with special reference to developing countries.” Unpublished manuscript.

  • Kim, Byung Kook 1987 “Bringing and managing socioeconomic change: The state in Korea and Mexico.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, Harvard University.

  • Kim, Eun Mee 1987 “From dominance to symbiosis: State and chaebol in the Korean economy, 1960–1985.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, Brown University.

  • Kim, Kwang Woong 1987 “The role of the state bureaucracy in development policies: Cases of selected countries in Asia.” Papers of the ASEAN and Japan Project no. 21, Nihon University, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, Anne O. 1974 “The political economy of the rent-seeking society.” American Economic Review 64:291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, Deepak 1988 The Hindu Equilibrium, Vol. I Cultural Stability and Economic Stagnation, India c1500BC-AD1980. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemarchand, Rene 1979 “The politics of penury in rural Zaire: The view from Bandundy.” In Guy Gran (ed.), Zaire: The Political Economy of Underdevelopment: 237–261. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, Margaret 1988 Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, Friedrich 1966 The National System of Political Economy (1885). New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, Luciano 1985 Estado Capitalista e Burocracia no Brasil Pos64. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Pza e Terra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, Joel 1988 Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murilo, Jose de Carvalho 1974 “Elite and state-building in Brazil.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, Stanford University.

  • Niskanen, William A. 1971 Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglas 1981 Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okimoto, Daniel I. 1989 Between MITI and the Market: Japanese Industrial Policy for High Technology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pang, Chien Kuo 1987 “The state and economic transformation: The Taiwan case.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, Brown University.

  • Polanyi, Karl 1957 The Great Transformation (1944). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulantzas, Nicos 1973 Political Power and Social Classes. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raw, Silvia 1985 “The political economy of Brazilian state-owned enterprises.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolf, Lloyd I. andSusanne Hoeber Rudolf 1987 In Pursuit of Lakshmi: The Political Economy of the Indian State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, Dietrich andPeter Evans 1985 “The state and economic transformation: Toward an analysis of the conditions underlying effective state intervention.” In Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol (eds.), Bringing the State Back In:44–77. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, Richard J. 1987 The Business of the Japanese State: Energy Markets in Comparative and Historical Perspective. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe 1971 Interest Conflict and Political Change in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987a “Politics within the state: Elite bureaucrats and industrial policy in authoritarian Brazil.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987b “Framing the state: Economic policy and political representation in post-authoritarian Brazil.” In John D. Wirth, Edson de Oliveira Nunes, and Thomas E. Bogenschild (eds.), State and Society in Brazil: Continuity and Change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Helen 1988 “State intervention and industrialization: The origins of the Brazilian automotive industry.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Economics, Yale University.

  • Srinivasan, T. N. 1985 “Neoclassical political economy, the state and economic development.” Asian Development Review 3:38–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tendler, Judith 1968 Electric Power in Brazil: Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trebat, Thomas 1983 Brazil's State-Owned Enterprises: A Case Study of the State as Entrepreneur. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uricoechea, Fernando 1980 The Patrimonial Foundations of the Brazilian Bureaucratic State. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, Robert Forthcoming Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in Taiwan's Industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Weber, Max 1968 Economy and Society. (1911) Guenter Roth and Claus Wittich, eds. New York: Bedminster Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Gordon, ed. 1988 Developmental States in East Asia. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 Developmental States in East Asia (IDS Research Report No. 16). London: Gatsby Charitable Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988 “Developmental states and markets in East Asia: An introduction.” In Gordon White (ed.), Developmental States in East Asia. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, Eliza J. 1986 “The state as banker: The expansion of the public sector in Brazil.” Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International [Microfilm No. 8706131].

    Google Scholar 

  • Woo, Jung-eun Forthcoming State Power, Finance and Industrialization of Korea. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • World Bank 1988 World Development Report, 1987. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of New Mexico, 87131, Albuquerque, New Mexico

    Peter B. Evans

Authors
  1. Peter B. Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, P.B. Predatory, developmental, and other apparatuses: A comparative political economy perspective on the Third World state. Sociol Forum 4, 561–587 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115064

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115064

Key words

  • state
  • industrialization
  • developmental state
  • neo-utilitarianism
  • East Asia
  • Japan
  • Brazil