Skip to main content
Log in

Ab Initio studies on the rotational equilibria of 2-substituted furan and thiophene carbonyl derivatives

  • Published:
Theoretica chimica acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The relative stabilities of syn- and anti-isomers of 2-substituted furan and thiophene carbonyl derivatives are investigated by theab initio MO method. The energy differences between the rotamers are 1–3 kcal mol−1 but the barriers to rotation are ca. 10 kcal mol−1 so that free rotational mode is predicted to be a rather difficult process. Application of the self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) method to account for the solvent effect indicates that the isomer with a higher dipole moment (syn) is favored in solution. An electron withdrawing 2-substituent favors syn-isomers for furan carbonyls in contrast to thiophene carbonyls for which anti-isomers are favored. These trends are ascribable to a decrease in electrostatic repulsive and attractive interactions, respectively, in the syn forms of furan and thiophene carbonyls. Contribution of non-bonded repulsive interaction in the anti-isomer is important for the relative stability of the syn-isomer of furan carbonyl derivative. Solvent effects due to higher dielectric continuum are small on the absolute values of energy differences but can reverse the order of stability of the two isomers due to a greater stability acquired by an isomer (syn) with higher dipole moment in solution. The major factor determining stability, or instability, of syn-isomer is a repulsive electrostatic interaction between the two oxygen atoms for furan carbonyls and an attractive electrostatic interaction between the sulfur and oxygen atoms for thiophene carbonyls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Determination of reactivity by MO theory, Part 96. Part 95., Lee D, Kim CK, Lee BS, Lee BC, Lee I (submitted for publication)

  2. Roques B, Combrisson S, Riche C, Pascard-Billy C (1970) Tetrahedron 26:3555;

    Google Scholar 

  3. Larsen RB, Nicolaisen F, Nielsen JT (1972) Acta Chem Scand 26:1736;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Abraham RJ, Siverns TM (1972) Tetrahedron 28:3015;

    Google Scholar 

  5. Monnig F, Dreizler H, Rudolph HD (1965) Z Naturforsch 20a:1323;

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arlinger L, Dahlquist K, Forser S (1970) Acta Chem Scand 24:662

    Google Scholar 

  7. Abraham RJ, Bretschneider E (1974) In: Orville-Thomas WJ (ed.) Internal rotation in molecules, Chap. 13 Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Allen G, Bernstein HJ (1955) Can J Chem 33:1055

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pople JA, Beveridge DL (1970) Approximate molecular orbital theory. McGraw-Hill, New York;

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wong MW, Frisch MJ, Wiberg KB (1991) J Am Chem Soc 113:4776

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jorgensen WL (1983) J Phys Chem 87:5304;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jorgensen WL (1989) Acc Chem Res 22:184

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kirkwood JG (1934) J Chem Phys 2: 351;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Onsager L (1936) J Am Chem Soc 58:1486

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rivail JL, Terryn B, Rinaldi D, Ruiz-Lapez MF (1985) THEOCHEM 120:387;

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tapia O, Gascinski O (1975) Mol Phys 29:1653;

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karelson MW, Tamm T, Katritzky AR, Szefran M, Zerner MC (1990) Int J Quantum Chem 37:1;

    Google Scholar 

  18. Karelson MM, Katritzky AR, Zerner MC (1986) Int J Quantum Chem Symp 20:521

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Head-Gordon M, Gill PMW, Wong MW, Foresman JB, Johnson BG, Schlegel HB, Robb MA, Replogle ES, Gomperts R, Andress JL, Raghavachari K, Binkley JS, Gonzalez C, Martin RL, Fox DJ, Defrees DJ, Baker J, Stewart JJP, Pople JA (1992) Gaussian 92, Revision C. Gaussian Inc, Pittsburgh, PA

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moller C, Plesset MS (1934) Plup Rev 46:618;

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hehre WJ, Radom L, Schleyer PvR, Pople JA (1986)Ab initio molecular orbital theory. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ref [10b, p 470];

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pople JA, Krishnan R, Schlegl HB, Binkley JS (1979) Int J Quant Chem s13:225

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taken from Tables of Interatomic Distances and Configuration in Molecule and Ions. Sutton LE (ed) (1965), Sp. Pub. no. 18, The Chem Soc, London

  25. Carsky P, Urban M (1980)Ab initio calculations methods and applications in chemistry, Lecture Notes in Chem, No 16. Springer Berlin, p 74

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taft RW (1956) In: Newman M (ed) Steric effects in organic chemistry, New York, Chap. 13, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  27. The inductive (σ1) and resonance (σR) substituent constants are taken from Klumpp GW (1982) Reactivity in organic chemistry. Wiley, New York, p 104

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fleming I (1976) Frontier orbitals and organic chemical reactions, Chap. 4. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lee I, Cheun YG, Yang K (1982) J Comput Chem 3:565

    Google Scholar 

  30. [Ref 10c, p 266]

  31. Dahlquist K-I, Forsen S (1965) J Phys Chem 69:4062;

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dahlquist K-I, Forsen S (1970) Acta Chem Scand 24:662

    Google Scholar 

  33. Payne PW, Allen LC (1977) Modern theoretical chemistry, Vol 4. Schaeffer HF (ed) Plenum, New York, p 29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, IS., Kim, C.K., Jung, H.J. et al. Ab Initio studies on the rotational equilibria of 2-substituted furan and thiophene carbonyl derivatives. Theoret. Chim. Acta 93, 199–210 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01113417

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01113417

Key words

Navigation