Theoretica chimica acta

, Volume 87, Issue 4–5, pp 277–292 | Cite as

The activation of the C-H bond in acetylene by second row transition metal atoms

  • P. E. M. Siegbahn
Article

Summary

The C-H activation reaction of acetylene by second row transition metal atoms has been studied including electron correlation of all valence electrons. Binding energies have been computed for both π-coordinated complexes and C-H insertion products. It is found that for most atoms the π-coordinated complexes are thermodynamically favoured, just as in the case for the corresponding ethylene reaction. The barrier height for the C-H insertion increases from acetylene to ethylene and to methane. This is in line with the experimental finding that there should be an inverse relation between C-H bond strengths and the difficulty to activate these bonds. To explain the detailed differences between the C-H activation of acetylene and ethylene, the interaction with two, rather than one, π- and π*-orbitals for acetylene is of key importance. The barrier height for the acetylene reaction increases significantly between niobium and molybdenum going to the right in the periodic table, just as for all oxidative addition reactions previously studied. The origin of this increase is that noibium has one empty 4d-orbital but for molybdenum all 4d-orbitals are occupied. Rhodium has the lowest barrier for C-H activation for all systems studied.

Key words

Acetylene C-H bond 2nd row transition metals Activation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fischer-Hjalmars I, Henriksson-Enflo A (1982) Adv Quantum Chem 16:1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fischer-Hjalmars I (1965) in: Sinanoglu O (ed) Modern quantum chemistry, Vol 1. Academic, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blomberg MRA, Siegbahn PEM, Svensson M (1992) J Am Chem Soc 114:6095Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siegbahn PEM, Blomberg MRA, Svensson M (1993) J Am Chem Soc 115:1952Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blomberg MRA, Siegbahn PEM, Svensson M (1992) J Phys Chem 96:9794Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siegbahn PEM, Blomberg MRA, Svensson M (1993) J Phys Chem 97:2564Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blomberg MRA, Siegbahn PEM, Svensson M, J Inorg Chem (in press)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Langhoff SR, Pettersson LGM, Bauschlicher CW (1987) Jr J Chem Phys 86:268Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bauschlicher CW Jr, Langhoff SR (1991) Chem Phys Lett 177:133Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shilov AE (1984) Activation of saturated hydrocarbons by transition metal complexes. Reidel, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jones WD, Feher FJ (1989) Acc Chem Res 22:91Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huzinaga S (1977) J Chem Phys 66:4245Google Scholar
  13. 13. (a)
    Almlöf J, Taylor PR (1987) J Chem Phys 86:4070Google Scholar
  14. 13. (b)
    Raffenetti RC (1973) J Chem Phys 58:4452Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    Huzinaga S (1971) Approximate atomic functions, II, Dept Chemistry Report, Univ of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  16. 15.
    Huzinaga S (1965) J Chem Phys 42:1293Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    STOCKHOLM is a general purpose quantum chemical set of programs written by Siegbahn PEM, Blomberg MRA, Roos BO, Almlöf J, Pettersson LGMGoogle Scholar
  18. 17.
    GAMESS (General Atomic and Molecular Electronic Structure System): Schmidt MW, Baldridge KK, Boatz JA, Jensen JH, Koseki S, Gordon MS, Nguyen KA, Windus TL, Elbert ST (1990) OCPE Bulletin 10:52Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    Hay PJ, Wadt WR (1985) J Chem Phys 82:299Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    Chong DP, Langhoff SR (1986) J Chem Phys 84:5606Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    Martin RL (1983) J Phys Chem 87:750. See also Cowan RD, Griffin DC (1976) J Opt Soc Am 66:1010Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    Widmark PO, Malmqvist PÅ, Roos BO (1990) Theor Chim Acta 77:291Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    The coupled cluster calculations are performed using the TITAN set of electronic structure programs, written by Lee TJ, Rendell AP, Rice JEGoogle Scholar
  24. 23.
    Sodupe M, Bauschlicher CW Jr (1991) J Phys Chem 95:8640Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    Sodupe M, Bauschlicher CW Jr, Langhoff SR, Partridge H (1992) J Phys Chem 96:2118Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    Bryndza HE, Fong LK, Paciello RA, Tam W, Bercaw JE (1987) J Am Chem Soc 109:1444Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    Stoutland PO, Bergman RG (1988) J Am Chem Soc 110:5732Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. E. M. Siegbahn
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of StockholmStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations