Skip to main content
Log in

Elimination of the diagonalization bottleneck in parallel Direct-SCF methods

  • Published:
Theoretica chimica acta Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

It is shown that the matrix diagonalization bottleneck associated with thesequential O(N 3BFN ) diagonalization of the fock matrix within each iteration of the Direct-SCF procedure may be eliminated, and replaced instead with a combination ofparallel O(N <4BFN ) andsequential O(N 3Sub ) steps. For large basis sets, the relation NSub

NBFN between the dimension of the expansion subspace and the number of basis functions leads to a method of wave-function optimization in which the sequential bottleneck is eliminated. As a side benefit, the second-order iterative procedure on which this method is based displays superior convergence properties, and provides greater insight into the behavior of the energy with respect to orbital variations, than the traditional first-order, fixed-point, iterative approaches. The implementation of this method may be incorporated into essentially any existing Direct-SCF program with only minimal, and localized, changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Roothaan CCJ (1951) Rev Mod Phys 23:69

    Google Scholar 

  2. Szabo A, Ostlund NS (1989) Modern quantum chemistry. McGraw-Hill, NY

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schlegel HB, McDouall JJW (1991) in: Ögretir C, Csizmadia I (eds) Computational advances in organic chemistry: Molecular structure and reactivity. NATO ASI Series C 330. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 167

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pulay P (1980) Chem Phys Lett 73:393; Pulay P (1982) J Computational Chem 3:556

    Google Scholar 

  5. Almlöf J, Faegri K, Korsell K (1982) J Computational Chem 3:385

    Google Scholar 

  6. Price SL, Harrison RJ, Guest MF (1989) J Computational Chem 10:552

    Google Scholar 

  7. Häser M, Ahlrichs R (1989) J Computational Chem 10:104

    Google Scholar 

  8. GAUSSIAN 88: Frisch MJ, Head-Gordon M, Schlegel HB, Raghavachari K, Binkley JS, Gonzalez C, Defrees DJ, Fox DJ, Whiteside RA, Seeger R, Melius CF, Baker J, Martin R, Kahn LR, Stewart JJP, Fluder EM, Topiol S, Pople JA. Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shepard R, Shavitt I, Pitzer RM, Comeau DC, Pepper M, Lischka H, Szalay PG, Ahlrichs R, Brown FB, Zhao JG (1988) Int J Quantum Chem S22:149; Shepard R, Lischka H, Szalay PG, Kovar T, Ernzerhof M (1992) J Chem Phys 96:2085

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shepard R (1987) in: Lawley KP (ed)Ab initio methods in quantum chemistry II, Advances in Chemical Physics 69. Wiley, NY, p 63

    Google Scholar 

  11. Littlefield R (this issue)

  12. Bacskay GB (1981) Chem Phys 61:385

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shepard R (1992) Theor Chim Acta 84:55–83

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moler C, van Loan C (1978) SIAM Rev 20:801

    Google Scholar 

  15. Browne T (1991) public communication via thecomp.parallel newsgroup, June, 1991. Tim Browne may be contacted via email at browne@think.com.

  16. Baugh J (1991) public communication via thecomp.parallel newsgroup, August, 1991. Jerry Baugh may be contacted via email at baugh@ssd.intel.com. Intel Touchstone benchmarks are made available also by R. A. van de Geijn at the email address rvdg@cs.utexas.edu.

  17. Shepard R (1990) J Computational Chem 11:45

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shepard, R. Elimination of the diagonalization bottleneck in parallel Direct-SCF methods. Theoret. Chim. Acta 84, 343–351 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01113273

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01113273

Key words

Navigation