Abstract
Using data from the 1910 and 1930 Censuses of Population, this paper examines how patterns of industrial change in American's five largest cities conditioned occupational opportunities for men and women. Theoretically, cities are conceptualized as independent dimensions of the nation's stratification system. Men and women in the early part of this century, then, confronted widely varying sets of occupational possibilities depending upon where they were located with respect to the spatial division of labor in the country. Results from a shift-share analysis show that the sexual division of labor in the United States was a function of, among other things, the territorial division of labor in the country.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahamson, Mark andLee Sigelman 1987 “Occupational sex segregation in metropolitan areas.” American Sociological Review 52:588–597.
Blalock, Hubert H., Jr. 1967 Toward a Theory of Minority Group Relations. New York: Wiley.
Bowen, William G. andT. Aldrich Finegan 1969 The Economics of Labor Force Participation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Conk, Margo 1980 The United States Census and Labor Force Change: A History of Occupation Statistics, 1870–1940. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press.
Duncan, Beverly andStanley Lieberson 1970 Metropolis and Region in Transition. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Edwards, Alba M. 1943 Comparative Occupation Statistics for the United States, 1870 to 1940. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Edwards, Richard C. 1979 Contested Terrain. New York: Basic Books.
England, Paula 1981 “Assessing trends in occupational sex segregation, 1900–1976.” In Ivar Berg (ed.), Sociological Perspectives on Labor Markets: 273–96. New York: Academic Press.
England, Paula andGeorge Farkas 1986 Households, Employment and Gender. New York: Aldine.
Falk, William W. andThomas A. Lyson 1988 High Tech, Low Tech, No Tech: Recent Industrial and Occupational Changes in the South. Albany, NY: SUNY-Albany Press.
Kaplan, D. L. andClaire M. Casey 1958 Occupational Trends in the United States, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Working Paper No. 5. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Oppenheimer, Valerie K. 1970 The Female Labor Force in the United States. Population Monograph Series No. 5. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
Perloff, Harvey, Edgar S. Dunn, Eric E. Lampard, andRichard F. Muth 1960 Regions, Resources and Economic Growth. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Reskin, Barbara F. andHeidi I. Hartmann 1986 Women's Work, Men's Work. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Semyonov, Moshe 1988 “Bi-ethnic labor markets, mono-ethnic labor markets, and socioeconomic inequality.” American Sociological Review 53:256–266.
Singelmann, Joachim andHarley Browning 1980 “Industrial transformation and occupational change in the U.S., 1960–1970.” Social Forces 59:246–264.
1979 “Changes in industry structure and female employment in Latin America: 1950–1970.” Sociology and Social Research 63:745–769.
1985 “The process of occupational change in a service society: The case of the United States, 1960–1980.” In B. Roberts, R. Finnegan, and D. Gallie (eds.), New Approaches to Economic Life: 48–67. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Tentler, Leslie W. 1979 Wage Earning Women: Industrial Work and Family Life in the United States, 1900–1930. New York: Oxford.
Wright, Erik O. andBill Martin 1987 “The transformation of the American class structure, 1960–1980.” American Journal of Sociology 93:1–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyson, T.A. Industrial shifts, occupational recomposition, and the changing sexual division of labor in the five largest U.S. cities: 1910–1930. Sociol Forum 6, 157–177 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112732
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112732