Skip to main content
Log in

Contested milieux: Small firms, unionization, and the provision of protective structures

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

Three trends in the workplace point to the importance of considering work relations as well as governance structures for the development of protective benefits such as pensions. The increasing concentration of employment growth in smaller firms, the general decline of unionization, and the changing composition of the work force constitute the new exigencies of worker-employer contracts. The 1983 Current Population Survey Pension Supplement is used in conjunction with certification data from the National Labor Relations Board to examine the interaction between firm size and the influence, as opposed to the prevalence, of unionization in the provision of pensions. Unionization is found to be more influential in the provision of pensions for workers in small firms despite the established prevalence of unionization in larger firms. The implications of these trends for labor market theory are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akerlof, George A. 1982 “Labor contracts as partial gift exchange.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 87:543–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Emily S. 1985 The Changing Profile of Pensions in America. Washington, DC: Employee Benefit Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, E. M., Patrick M. Horan, andCharles M. Tolbert, III 1978 “Stratification in a dual economy: A sectoral model of earnings determination.” American Sociological Review 43:704–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beller, Daniel J. 1981 “Coverage patterns of full-time employees under private retirement plans.” Social Security Bulletin 44:3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, David L. 1987 Job Creation in America. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, Alfred D., Jr. 1977 The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeViney, Stanley andAngela M. O'Rand 1988 “Gender-cohort succession and retirement among older men and women, 1951 to 1984.” Sociological Quarterly 29:525–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, Peter B. andDavid G. Terkla 1990 “Business necessity, bridge jobs and the nonbureaucratic firm.” In Peter B. Doeringer (ed.), Bridges to Retirement: Older Workers in a Changing Labor Market: 146–171. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, Lucia F. 1984 “The effect of firm size on wages, fringe benefits, and work disutility.” In Betty Bock, Harvey J. Goldschmid, Ira M. Millstein, and F. M. Scherer (eds.), The Impact of the Modern Corporation: 5–58. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Richard 1979 Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, Henry S. 1987 “The recent decline of unionization in the United States.” Scientific American 238:915–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Form, William andJoan Huber 1976 “Occupational power.” In Robert Dubin (ed.), Handbook of Work, Organization, and Society: 751–806. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. andJonathan Leonard 1987 “Union maids: Unions and the female work force.” In Clair Brown and Joseph A. Pechman (eds.), Gender in the Workplace: 189–212. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. andJames L. Medoff 1984 What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfield, Michael 1987 The Decline of Organized Labor in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1984 “Small is bountiful: Labor markets and establishment size.” American Sociological Review 49:323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985 “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91:481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Richard 1982 “Tracking job growth in private industry.” Monthly Labor Review 105:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchens, Robert M. 1988 “Do job opportunities decline with age?” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 42:89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Sanford M. 1985 Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in American Industry, 1900–1945. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerman, Sheila B. andAlfred J. Kahn 1987 The Responsive Workplace: Employers and a Changing Labor Force. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, Thomas A., Harry C. Katz, andRobert B. McKersie 1986 The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodrubetz, Walter W. andDonald M. Landay 1973 “Coverage and vesting of full-time employees under private retirement plans.” Social Security Bulletin 36:20–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979 “Why is there mandatory retirement?” Journal of Political Economy 87:1261–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “Pensions as severance pay.” In Zvi Bodie and John B. Shoven (eds.), Financial Aspects of the United States Pension System: 57–89. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magidson, Jay 1981 “Qualitative variance, entropy, and correlation ratios for nominal dependent variables.” Social Science Research 10:177–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Malcolm H. 1983 “The aging of the U.S. population: Human resource implications.” Monthly Labor Review 106:13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Labor Relations Board 1972–1982 Annual Report of the National Labor Relations Board. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1970 The Female Labor Force in the United States. Berkeley: University of California Institute of International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1982 Work and The Family: A Study in Social Demography. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “The hidden payroll: Employee benefits and the structure of workplace inequality.” Sociological Forum 1:657–683.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1988 “Convergence, institutionalization and bifurcation: Gender and the pension acquisition process.” In George L. Maddox and M. Powell Lawton (eds.), Annual Review of Geriatrics and Gerontology, vol. 8:132–155. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Rand, Angela M. and Margaret L. Krecker 1988 “Pensions, unions, and small firms: Trends in pension protection in the workplace.” Paper presented at the 41st annual scientific meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, San Francisco, CA.

  • O'Rand, Angela M. andVicky M. MacLean 1986 “Labor market, pension rule structure and retirement benefit promise for long-term employees.” Social Forces 65:224–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey andJames N. Baron 1988 “Taking the workers back out: Recent trends in the structuring of employment.” In Barry M. Staw and Larry L. Cummings (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 10:257–303. Greewich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey andYinon Cohen 1984 “Determinants of internal labor markets in organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly 29:550–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzebon, Sylvana andOlivia S. Mitchell 1989 “Married women's retirement behavior.” Journal of Population Economics 2:39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Joseph F. 1982 “Compensation in the public sector: The importance of pensions.” In Robert H. Haveman (ed.), Public Finance and Public Employment: 227–242. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, Lawrence S. 1985 “Employee benefits and social welfare: Complement and conflict.” Annals AAPSS 479:101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavick, Fred 1966 Compulsory and Flexible Retirement in the American Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census 1985 Current Population Survey, May 1983: Pension and Retirement Plan Coverage. Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics 1988 “The labor shift towards small business: Where the jobs are.” Wall Street Journal 27 April: 1.

  • U.S. Small Business Administration 1989 The Annual Report on Small Business and Competition. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. 1981 “The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach.” American Journal of Sociology 87:548–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, John R. 1989 “Pension coverage among private wage and salary workers: Preliminary findings from the 1988 Survey of Employee Benefits.” Social Security Bulletin 52:2–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krecker, M.L., O'Rand, A.M. Contested milieux: Small firms, unionization, and the provision of protective structures. Sociol Forum 6, 93–117 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112729

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112729

Key words

Navigation