Conclusions
The issues related to administrative decentralization, community control, and community participation have not been satisfactorily resolved by the various proponents. Do students, schools, or society really benefit? There is little research evidence that any one of these three administrative models, alone or combined, have positive effects. If no systematic response to these models is provided by the proponents, they are operating on unsupported assertions or questionable assumptions, reform slogans, and political pressures, and many of their concusions, either stated or implied, are probably unjustified.
The lack of data on administrative-community “solutions” (decentralization, community control, even community participation) means there are more slogans than carefully worked-out concepts with consequences understood and accounted for. We often assume that the “community” voice is the most vocal and articulated, and we have yet to hear from the majority of silent parents, who have their own aspirations for their children and their own ideas about how the school should fulfill them. Indeed, we need a partnership between practitioners and researchers, among the various interest groups, and especially between blacks and whites, if a breakthrough is to be made to a higher level of mutual understanding and quality education for all children and youth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, B. The battle for school jobs: New York's newest agony.Phi Delta Kappan, 1972,53, 9, 553–559.
Fantini, M. D. Community participation: alternative patterns and their consequences on educational achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April 1980.
Fantini, M. D., and Gittell, M.Decentralization: achieving reform. New York: Praeger, 1973.
Filipczak, J. Parental involvement in the schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April 1977.
Gittell, M. Critique of the citizen participation in education.Journal of Education, 1977,159 (1), 7–22.
Grant, W. Community control v. school integration—the Detroit case.United Teacher Magazine, November 7, 1971, 1–4.
Havighurst, R. J., and Levine, D. U.Education in metropolitan schools 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1971.
LaNoue, G. R., and Smith, B. L. The political evolution of school decentralization.American Behavioral Scientist 1971,15 (1), 73–93.
LaNoue, G. R., and Smith, B. L.The politics of school decentralization. Lexington, Mass.: Heath, 1973.
Lopate, C., et al., Decentralization and community participation in public education.Review of educational research 1970,40 (1), 135–150.
Miller, H. L.Social foundations of education: an urban focus 3rd ed. New York: Holt, 1978.
Ornstein, A. C. Administrative/community organization of metropolitan schools.Phi Delta Kappan 197354 (10), 668–674.
Ornstein, A. C.Metropolitan schools: administrative decentralization vs. community control. Metuchen, N.J.: Scarecrow Press, 1974.
Ornstein, A. C. Administrative decentralization and community involvement: research with policy implications.Viewpoints 1980,56 (2) 82–96.
Ornstein, A. C. Decentralization and community participation policy of big school systems,Phi Delta Kappan 1980,62 (4), 255–257.
Ornstein, A. C. Composition of board members of public school systems enrolling 50,000 or more students.Urban Education 1981,16 (2), 232–234.
Ornstein, A. C., Levine, D. U., and Wilkerson, D. A.Reforming metropolitan schools. Pacific Palisades, Calif.: Goodyear, 1975.
Passow, A. H.Toward creating a model urban school system. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University, 1973.
Saxe, R. W.School-community interaction. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1975.
Schiff, M. Educational failure of community control in inner city New York.Phi Delta Kappan 1976, 57 (6), 375–378.
Shanker, A. Cult of localism. In P. C. Sexton (Ed.),School policy and issues in a changing society. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1971, pp. 213–224.
Selden, D. The future of community participation in educational policy making. In C. A. Grant (Ed.),Community participation in education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1979.
Stanwich, M. E.Patterns of participation. Boston: Institute for Responsive Education, 1975.
Steinberg, L. S. The changing role of parent groups in educational decision making. In R. S. Brandt (Ed.),Patterns: parents and schools. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1979, pp. 46–57.
Talmage, H., and Ornstein, A. C. School superintendents' attitudes toward community participation and control.Educational Research Quarterly 1976, 2 (2), 37–45.
Wagennar, T. E. School achievement level vis-a-vis community involvement and support. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago, April 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ornstein, A.C. Administrative decentralization and community policy: Review and outlook. Urban Rev 15, 3–10 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112338
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112338