Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Educational “excellence” versus teacher “professionalism”: Towards some conceptual clarity

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The educational literature of the last several years is replete with both continuing calls for educational “excellence” reforms and for enhancing and upgrading the teaching “profession.” Importantly, both types of calls rely on the contribution of science. The educational research-and-development community continues to push for and believe in the notion that educational innovation is based on scientific advances in understanding child development and school functioning. Similarly, many teachers and teacher educators continually call for increased classroom autonomy and social status among teachers, based upon the supposedly scientific nature of their professional training. This paper takes issue with both of these points, arguing that the origin and success of most educationally innovative policies have as their origin the changing political, economic, and social forces visible in the country during the history of American education. Relatedly, since the science of teaching and learning takes a back seat in issues of school policy, teachers cannot and will not be able to convince the public and those in authority in the school that their insights and practices derive from any privileged understanding of the “real” needs of children. Arguing that teachers should, in fact, have more input into policy decisions in education, the paper concludes with a review and discussion of various strategies currently visible for improving the autonomy and control of classroom educators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apple, M. (1983). Curricular form and the logic of technical control. In Apple, M., and Weiss, L. (eds.),Ideology and Practice in Schooling. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, S., and Giroux, H. (1985).Education Under Seige. South Hadley, Mass: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, G., and Garber, H. (1985).Research in Exemplary Schools. Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P., and Scott, R. (1962).Formal Organizations. Scranton, PA.: Chandler Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bledstein, B. (1976)The Culture of Professionalism. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., and Gintis, H. (1976).Schooling in Capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredo, E., and Feinberg, W. (1982).Knowledge and Values in Social and Educational Research. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M., and Levin, H. (1976).The Limits of Educational Reform. New York: McKay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., and Garet, M. (1975). Reforming educational policy with applied social research.Harvard Educational Review 45: 1743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1979).The Credential Society. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corwin, R. (1965).A Sociology of Education: Emerging Patterns of Class, Status and Power in the Public School. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1985). Valuing teachers: the making of a profession.Teachers College Record 87: 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Young, A. (1985). Assessing “faculty productivity” in colleges of education: penetration of the technical thesis into the status system of academe.Educational Theory 35: 411–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1982) Cultural capital and school success: the impact of status culture participation on the grades of U.S. high school students.American Sociological Review 47: 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, L., and Schimmel. (1982).The Rights of Students and Teachers. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedson, E. (1973). Dominant professions, bureaucracy and client services. In Rosengren, W. R., and Lefton, M. (eds.),Organizations and Clients: Essays in the Sociology of Service. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1984). Teaching and the role of the resisting intellectual. InPhilosophical Studies in Education. Coraopolis, Pa.: Ohio Valley Philosophy of Education Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurn, C. (1978).The Limits and Possibilities of Schooling. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I., et al. (1978).Disabling Professions. Boston: Marion Boyers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, E., et al. (1972)Inequality: A Reassassement of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., Hersch, R., and McKibbin, M. (1983).The Structure of School Improvement. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. (1975).Class, Bureaucracy, and Schools. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keesbury, F. (1984). Who wrecked our schools? Thirty years of criticism in perspecive.Educational Theory 34: 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirst, M. (1984).Who Controls Our Schools. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1979).The Culture of Narcissism. New York: Norton

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1969). The balance of control and autonomy in elementary school teaching. In Etzioni, A. (ed.),The Semi-Professions and Their Organization. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975).Schoolteacher. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1986). Teacher status in Dade County: A case of structural strain?Phi Delta Kappan (April) 568–575.

  • McDill, E., Natriello, G., and Pallas, A. (1986). A population at risk: potential consequences of tougher school standards for student dropouts.American Journal of Education 94: 135–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerschmidt, D. (1984). Federal bucks for local change: on the ethnography of experimental schools. In Fetterman, D. (ed.),Ethnography in Educational Evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohanian, S. (1985). On stir -and-serve recipes for teaching.Phi Delta Kappan (June), 694–701.

  • Papagiannis, G., Klees, S., and Bickel, R. (1982). Toward a political economy of educational innovation.Review of Educational Research 52: 245–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, J. (1985). Toward teacher maturity.Journal of Teacher Education 36: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlechty, P. (1976)Teaching and Social Behavior. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlechty, P. (1985). A framework for evaluating induction into teaching.Journal of Teacher Education 34: 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, H. (1985). Capitalism at risk: the political economy of the eductional reports of 1983.Educational Theory 35: 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shug, M. (1983). Teacher burnout and professionalism.Issues in Education 1: 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. (1980).Educating the Worker-Citizen. New York: Longman

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1961). The second transformation of American secondary education.International Journal of Comparative Sociology 2: 144–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D. (1974).The One Best System. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., and Hansot, C. (1982).Managers of Virtue. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, W. (1965).The Sociology of Teaching. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947).The Theory of Social and Economic Organization A. Henderson and T. Parsons (trans.). Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolcott, H. (1977).Teachers vs. Technocrats: An Educational Innovation in Anthropological Perspective. Eugene, Ore.: Center for Educational Policy and Management, University of Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeYoung, A.J. Educational “excellence” versus teacher “professionalism”: Towards some conceptual clarity. Urban Rev 18, 71–84 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112124

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01112124

Keywords

Navigation