Abstract
Recent attention on the principal as instructional leader of the school has overshadowed the dual nature of the principal's role as a subordinate of the central office as well as superordinate of the school. An understanding of how principals respond to this dual role is useful in developing appropriate school improvement strategies. This study examines the diversity of principals' responses to one aspect of this dual role, the potential conflict between principal and central office. The investigation, involving a sample of 89 suburban elementary school principals, uses both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. The study found that principals vary in their responses to this potential conflict depending on their career histories. Principals who have moved among several districts are more likely to have conflict with CO, while principals who have remained in the current district throughout their careers are less likely to have this conflict. Several features of career mobility are examined as possible explanations for the findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacharach, S.B., and Mitchell, S.M. (1983). The sources of dissatisfaction in educational administration: A role specific analysis.Educational Administration Quarterly 19: 101–128.
Bridgman, A. (1986). Better elementary principals called for.Education Week, Feb. 19, p. 7.
Carlson, R.O. (1972).School Superintendents: Careers and Performance. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Crowson, R. L., and Morris, V.C. (1984). Administrative control in large-city school systems: An investigation in Chicago. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Gouldner, A.W. (1957). Cosmopolitans and locals–I.Administrative Science Quarterly, 2: 281–306.
Hackman, J.R., and Lawler, E.E. (1971). Employee reactions to job satisfaction characteristics.Journal of Applied Psychology 55: 259–286.
Hallinger, P. and Murphy, J. (1982). The superintendent's role in prompting instructional leadership.Administrators' Notebook 30: 6.
Hart, A., and Ogawa, R. (1984). An examination of the effect of superintendents on the instructional performance of school districts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Herzber, F., Mausner, B., and Snyderman, B. (1959).The Motivation to Work. New York: Wiley.
Hill, P., Wuchitech, J., and Williams, R. (1980).The Effects of Federal Education Programs on School Principals. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
Hughes, E.C. (1958).Men and their Work. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Lortie, D.C., Crow, G.M., and Prolman, S. (1983).The Elementary School Principal in Suburbia: An Occupational and Organizational Study. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
Maslow, A.H. (1943). A theory of human motivation.Psychological Review 50: 370–396.
Miskel, C.G. Glasnapp, D., and Hatley, R. (1975). A test of the inequity theory for job satisfaction using educators' attitudes toward work motivation and work incentives.Educational Administration Quarterly 11: 38–54.
Mintzberg, H. (1979).The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ortiz, F.I. (1982).Career Patterns in Education: Women, Men, and Minorities in Public School Administration. New York: Praeger.
Peterson, K.D. (1984). Mechanisms of administrative control over managers in educational organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly 29: 573–597.
Peterson, K.D., Hallinger, P., and Murphy, J. (1987). Superintendents' perceptions of the control and coordination of the technical core in effective school districts.Educational Administration Quarterly 23(1): 79–95.
Prolman, S. (1983). Gender, career paths, and administrative perceptions.Administrators' Notebook 30(5): 1–4.
Schein, E.H. (1971). The individual, the organization, and the career: A conceptual scheme.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 7: 401–426.
Schmuck, P.A. Charters, W.W., and Carlson, R.O. (1981).Educational Policy and Management: Sex Differentials. New York: Academic Press.
Smith, P.C., Kendall, L.M., and Hulin, C.L. (1969).The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement. Chicago: Rand-McNally.
Thompson, J.D., Avery, R.W., and Carlson, R.O. (1968). Occupations, personnel, and careers.Educational Administration Quarterly 4: 6–31.
Van Maanen, J., ed. (1977)Organizational Careers: Some New Perspectives. New York: Wiley.
Vroom, V.H. (1964).Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley.
Watson, D.G. (1974).Superintendents' mobility constructs and succession patterns. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
Weick, K.E. (1969).The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crow, G.M. Career mobility of elementary school principals and conflict with the central office. Urban Rev 19, 139–150 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01111875
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01111875