Skip to main content
Log in

Small firm entry in manufacturing industries: Lower Saxony, 1979–1989

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is an empirical study of inter-industry and inter-temporal variations in entry of new firms using longitudinal data covering all manufacturing establishments in Lower Saxony between 1979 and 1989. Patterns of entry are reported for 29 industries based on numbers of new firms, gross rates of entry, and entry intensities (shares of employees) in different types and size classes of new firms. Entry varies considerably between firm types, industries, and over time. Focussing on entry by small single firms an empirical model is applied to search for industry characteristics that are highly correlated with entry. Pooling of cross-section and time-series data allows to control for influences of varying macroeconomic conditions and unobserved industry characteristics. A highly robust estimation method is applied for the first time in a study of entry rates, and it turns out that extreme observations often have large effect on the results. Entry intensity tends to be positively related to industry growth, concentration, and high unemployment, but negatively to high interest rates, profits, and (insignificantly) to intensive use of capital and R&D. I plead for further research vialearning by asking those who are doing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1989, ‘Births and Firm Size’,Southern Economic Journal 56, 467–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Zoltan J. Acs, forthcoming, ‘New-Firm Startups, Technology, and Macroeconomic Fluctuations’, in Yuichi Shionoya and Mark Perlman (eds.),Innovation in Technology, Industries, and Institutions: Comparative Perspectives, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

  • Audretsch, David B. and Michael Fritsch, 1992, ‘Market Dynamics and Regional Development in the Federal Republic of Germany’,Discussion Paper FS IV 92–6, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.

  • Blinder, Alan S., 1990, ‘Learning by Asking Those Who Are Doing’,Eastern Economic Journal XVI, 297–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeri, Tito, 1990, ‘Wage Differentials, Entry and the Job Generation Process in Germany’,Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, No. 5, Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeri, Tito and Ulrich Cramer, 1991, ‘Betriebliche Wachstumsprozesse: Eine Statistische Analyse mit der Beschäftigtenstatistik 1977–1987’,Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt-und Berufsforschung 24, 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, Josef, Peter Preisendörfer and Rolf Ziegler, 1992, ‘Survival Chances of Newly Founded Business Organizations’,American Sociological Review 57, 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, Josef and Rudolf Schüssler, 1990, ‘Organizational Mortality: The Liability of Newness and Adolescence’,Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 530–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, John and Joachim Schwalbach, 1991, ‘International Comparisons of Entry and Exit’, in Paul A. Geroski and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.),Entry and Market Contestability, An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, Timothy and Mark J. Roberts, 1991, ‘Variation in Producer Turnover Across US Manufacturing Industries’, in Paul A. Geroski and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.),Entry and Market Contestability, An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • von der Fehr, Niels-Henrik M., 1991, ‘Domestic Entry in Norwegian Manufacturing Industries’, in Paul A. Geroski and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.),Entry and Market Contestability, An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B., 1989,Labour Markets in Action, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, Michael, 1992, ‘Regional Differences in New Firm Formation: Evidence from West Germany’,Regional Studies 26, 233–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, Knut and Joachim Wagner, 1992, ‘Entries, Exits, and the Dynamics of Employment: Lower Saxony, 1978–1990’,mimeo, Institute for Quantitative Economic Research, University of Hannover.

  • Geroski, Paul A., 1991a,Market Dynamics and Entry, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A., 1991b, ‘Some Data-Driven Reflections on the Entry Process’, in Paul A. Geroski and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.),Entry and Market Contestability, An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul A. and Robert T. Masson (eds.), 1987, ‘Entry, Exit and Market Dynamics, A Special Issue’,International Journal of Industrial Organization 5, 1–126.

  • Geroski, Paul A. and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.), 1991,Entry and Market Contestability, An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorecki, Paul K., 1975, ‘The Determinants of Entry by New and Diversifying Enterprises in the UK Manufacturing Sector 1958–1963: Some Tentative Results’,Applied Economics 7, 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorecki, Paul K., 1976, ‘The Determinants of Entry by Domestic and Foreign Enterprises in Canadian Manufacturing Industries: Some Comments and Empirical Results’,Review of Economic and Statistics 58, 485–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hause, John C. and Gunnar DuRietz, 1984, ‘Entry, Industry Growth, and the Microdynamics of Industry Supply’,Journal of Political Economy 92, 733–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, Cheng, 1986,Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISW, 1992,Der Stand der empirischen Gründungsforschung anhand ausgewählter Studien, Stuttgart: Institut für südwestdeutsche Wirtschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khemani, R. S. and D. M. Shapiro, 1988, ‘On Entry and Mobility Barriers’,Antitrust Bulletin, Spring, 115–134.

  • Mansfield, Edwin, 1962, ‘Entry, Gibrat's Law, Innovation, and the Growth of Firms’,American Economic Review 52, 1023–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Methner, Eckart, 1992, ‘Das Erhebungsprogramm der amtlichen Statistik im Bereich des Produzierenden Gewerbes’, in Rainer Ertel and Joachim Wagner (eds.),Produzieren in Niedersachsen — Empirische Untersuchungen mit Betriebsdaten, Hannover: NIW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, Dennis C., 1991, ‘Entry, Exit, and the Competitive Process’, in Paul A. Geroski and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.),Entry and Market Contestability, An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Jürgen, 1987,Beschäftigungswirkungen durch mittelständische Betriebe und Betriebsgründungen. Eine empirische Analyse für den Industriebereich Niedersachsens im Zeitraum 1977 bis 1984, Hannover: Niedersächsisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otremba, Walther, 1980,Marktzugangsbeschränkungen als Problem der Wettbewerbspolitik, Düsseldorf: Mannhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otremba, Walther, 1982, ‘Die empirische Relevanz vom Narktzutrittsbarrieren’,Konjunkturpolitik 28, 190–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseeuw, Peter J. and Annick M. Leroy, 1987,Robust Regression and Outlier Detection, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schasse, Ulrich, 1992, ‘Überlebenschancen und Beschäftigungswirkungen neugegründeter Industriebetriebe in Niedersachsen’, in Rainer Ertel and Joachim Wagner (eds.),Produzieren in Niedersachsen — Empirische Untersuchungen mit Betriebsdaten, Hannover: NIW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. and David Ross, 1990,Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Third Edition, Boston etc.: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmalensee, Richard, 1989, ‘Inter-Industry Studies of Structure and Performance’, in Richard Schmalensee and Robert Willig (eds.),Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2, Amsterdam etc.: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbach, Joachim, 1987, ‘Entry by Diversified Firms into German Industries’,International Journal of Industrial Organization 5, 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbach, Joachim, 1991, ‘Entry, Exit, Concentration, and Market Contestability’, in Paul A. Geroski and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.),Entry and Market Contestability, An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Daniel M., 1983, ‘Entry, Exit, and the Theory of the Multinational Corporation’, in Charles P. Kindleberger and David B. Audretsch (eds.),The Multinational Corporation in the 1980s, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sleuwaegen, Leo and Wim Dehandschutter, 1991, ‘Entry and Exit in Belgian Manufacturing’, in Paul A. Geroski and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.),Entry and Market Contestability. An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamawaki, Hideki, 1991, ‘The Effects of Business Conditions on Net Entry: Evidence from Japan’, in Paul A. Geroski and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.),Entry and Market Contestability, An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is part of the research project “Production, Employment Growth, and Exports by Lower Saxonian Firms”. The computations based on the establishment level data from the official surveys of the manufacturing sector were made possible by a special arrangement between the Ministry of Economics, the Statistical Office, and the Labor Research Group at the Department of Economics, Hannover University. I thank Uwe Rode from the Lower Saxonian Statistical Office for preparing the longitudinal establishment level data base. Financial support from research funds provided by the state of Lower Saxony is gratefully acknowledged.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, J. Small firm entry in manufacturing industries: Lower Saxony, 1979–1989. Small Bus Econ 6, 211–223 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01108289

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01108289

Keywords

Navigation