Skip to main content
Log in

Models and trends of log-linear association

Applications to mobility tables for U.S. white males, 1952 to 1984

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Log-linear models afford a wide range of tests regarding specific aspects of the association between two ordinal-level variables with identical attributes. This range is considerably broadened when orthogonal contrasts are used to trace changes in these aspects over time. This paper provides descriptions and graphic illustrations of six common log-linear models' applications to mobility data on U.S. white males. The models are then expanded to examine temporal variations in aspects of the mobility regime captured by the respective models. The analysis shows a significant increase over the period of study in the odds that white males from blue collar backgrounds attain higher occupational statuses. Moreover, the findings indicate that blue collar workers are more likely to be drawn from lower status origins during years of economic prosperity, and from higher status origins at times of economic dearth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • DiPrete, T.A. & Grusky, D.B. (1989). The multilevel analysis of trends with repeated cross-sectional data. Paper presented at the 1988 meeting of the American Sociological Association.

  • Duncan, O.D. (1966). Methodological issues in the analysis of social mobility. In N.J. Smelser and S.M. Lipset (eds),Social Structure and Mobility in Economic Development, Chicago: Aldine, pp. 51–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O.D. (1968). Social stratification and mobility: Problems in the measurement of trend. In E.B. Sheldon & W.E. Moore (eds.),Indicators of Social Change, New York: Sage, pp. 675–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O.D. (1979). How destination depends on origin in the occupational mobility table.American Journal of Sociology 84: 793–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzeboom, H.B.G., Treiman, D.J. & Ultee, W.C. (1991). Comparative intergenerational stratification research: Three generations and beyond.Annual Review of Sociology 17: 277–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1972). Some multiplicative models for the analysis of cross-classified data. In L. LeCam, J. Neyman & E. Scott (eds),Proceedings of the Sixth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 649–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L.A. (1979). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories.Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 537–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusky, D.B. & Hauser, R.M. (1984). Comparative social mobility revisited: Models of convergence and divergence in 16 countries.American Sociological Review 49: 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, S.J. (1979).Analysis of Qualitative Data. 2 vols. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R.M. (1979) Some exploratory methods for modeling mobility tables and other cross-classified data. In K. Schuessler (ed.),Sociological Methodology 1980, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 413–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, R.M., Dickinson, P.J., Travis, H.P. & Koffel, J.M. (1975). Structural changes in occupational mobility among men in the United States.American Sociological Review 40: 585–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout, M. (1983).Mobility tables. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hout, M. (1984). Status, autonomy, and training in occupational mobility.American Journal of Sociology 89: 1379–1409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R.E. (1982).Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. A. (1983). A multivariate model for mobility tables.American Journal of Sociology 89: 324–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matras, J. (1980). Comparative social mobility.Annual Review of Sociology 6: 401–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClendon, McKee J. (1977). Structural and exchange components of vertical mobility.American Sociological Review 42: 56–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D.C. (1976).Design and Analysis of Experiments. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semyonov, M. & Roberts, C.W. (1989). Ascription and achievement: Trends in occupational mobility in the United States, 1952–1984. In A.L. Kalleberg (ed.),Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Vol. 8, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 107–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkus, A.A. (1984). Structural transformation and social mobility: Hungary 1938–1973.American Sociological Review 49: 291–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, G. (1974). Alternative analyses for the singly-ordered contingency table.Journal of the American Statistical Association 69: 971–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M.E., Hout, M. & Duncan, O.D. (1985). Exchange, structure, and symmetry in occupational mobility.American Journal of Sociology 91: 359–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyree, A., Semyonov, M. & Hodge, R.W. (1979). Gaps and glissandos: Inequality, economic development, and social mobility in 24 countries.American Sociological Review 44: 410–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, K. (1987). Models for comparing mobility tables: Toward parsimony and substance.American Sociological Review 52: 482–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, C.W., Hoyt, D.R. Models and trends of log-linear association. Qual Quant 29, 17–37 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01107981

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01107981

Keywords

Navigation