Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 70, Issue 1–4, pp 659–673 | Cite as

Vegetation redistribution: A possible biosphere source of CO2 during climatic change

  • Ronald P. Neilson
Part III Workshop Research Presentations Section 5: Terrestrial Carbon Models


A new biogeographic model, MAPSS, predicts changes in vegetation leaf area index (LAI), site water balance and run off, as well as changes in Biome boundaries. Potential scenarios of equilibrium vegetation redistribution under 2 × CO2 climate from five different General Circulation Models (GCMs) are presented. In general, large spatial shifts in temperate and boreal vegetation are predicted under the different scenarios; while, tropical vegetation boundaries are predicted (with one exception) to experience minor distribution contractions. Maps of predicted changes in forest LAI imply drought-induced losses of biomass over most forested regions, even in the tropics. Regional patterns of forest decline and dieback are surprisingly consistent among the five GCM scenarios, given the general lack of consistency in predicted changes in regional precipitation patterns. Two factors contribute to the consistency among the GCMs of the regional ecological impacts of climatic change: 1) regional, temperature-induced increases in potential evapotranspiration (PET) tend to more than offset regional increases in precipitation; and, 2) the unchanging background interplay between the general circulation and the continental margins and mountain ranges produces a fairly stable pattern of regionally specific sensitivity to climatic change. Two areas exhibiting among the greatest sensitivity to drought-induced forest decline are eastern North America and eastern Europe to western Russia. Drought-induced vegetation decline (losses of LAI), predicted under all GCM scenarios, will release CO2 to the atmosphere; while, expansion of forests at high latitudes will sequester CO2. The imbalance in these two rate processes could produce a large, transient pulse of CO2 to the atmosphere.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abramopolous, F., Rosenzweig, C. and Choudhury, B.: 1988,J. Climate 1, 921–941.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous: 1984a,Agroclimatological Data for Africa, Volume 1. Countries North of the Equator, FAO Plant Production and Protection Series 22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous: 1984b,Agroclimatological Data for Africa, Volume 2. Countries South of the Equator, FAO Plant Production and Protection Series 22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymous: 1987a,Agroclimatological Data for Asia, Volume 1. A-J, FAO Plant Production and Protection Series 25. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous: 1987b,Agroclimatological Data for Asia, Volume 2. K-Z, FAO Plant Production and Protection Series 25. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, R.G.: 1989,Environ. Conserv. 16, 307–309.Google Scholar
  7. Box, E.O.: 1981,Macroclimate and Plant Forms: An Introduction to Predictive Modeling in Phytogeography, Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  8. Burke, M.J., Gusta, L.V., Quamme, H.A., Weiser, C.J. and Li, P.H.: 1976,Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 27, 507–528.Google Scholar
  9. Cramer, W.P. and Solomon, A.M.: (in press),Clim. Res. Google Scholar
  10. Dice, L.R.: 1943,The Biotic Provinces of North America, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  11. Emanuel, W.R., Shugart, H.H. and Stevenson, M.P.: 1985,Clim. Change 7, 29–43.Google Scholar
  12. Hansen, J., Fung, I., Lacis, A., Rind, D., Lebedeff, S. and Ruedy, R.: 1988,J. Geophys.Res. 93, 9341–9364.Google Scholar
  13. Holdridge, L.R.: 1947,Science 105, 267–268.Google Scholar
  14. Houghton, J.T., Jenkins, G.J. and Ephraums, J.J. (eds.).: 1990,Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. King, G.A. and Neilson, R.P.: 1992,Water,Air Soil Poll. 64, 365–383.Google Scholar
  16. Küchler, A.W.: 1964,Potential Natural Vegetation, American Geographical Society, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Leemans, R. and Cramer, W.P.: 1991,International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, RR-91-18, 1–62.Google Scholar
  18. Manabe, S., Stouffer, R.J., Spelman, M.J. and Bryan, K.: 1991,J. Climate 4, 785–818.Google Scholar
  19. Marshall, J.D. and Waring, R.H.: 1984,Nature 330(19), 238–240.Google Scholar
  20. Monserud, R.A. and Leemans, R.: 1992,Ecol. Model. 62, 275–293.Google Scholar
  21. Müller, M.J.: 1982,Selected climatic data for a global set of standard stations for vegetation science, Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  22. Neilson, R.P.: 1987,Vegetatio 70, 135–147.Google Scholar
  23. Neilson, R.P. and Wullstein. L.H.: 1983,J. Biogeog. 10, 275–297.Google Scholar
  24. Neilson, R.P. and King, G.A.: 1992, Continental Scale Biome Response to Climatic Change, In: McKenzie, D.H., Hyatt, D.E. and McDonald, V.J. (eds),Ecological Indicators, Volume 2, Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp. 1015–1040.Google Scholar
  25. Neilson, R.P., King, G.A., DeVelice, R.L., Lenihan, J., Marks, D., Dolph, J., Campbell, W. and Glick, G.: 1989,Sensitivity of Ecological Landscapes to Global Climatic Change, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-600-3-89-073, NTIS-PB-90-120-072-AS, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  26. Neilson, R.P., King, G.A. and Koerper, G.: 1992,Lands. Ecol. 7, 27–43.Google Scholar
  27. Neilson, R.P., King, G.A. and Lenihan, J.: (in press), Modeling forest response to climatic change: the potential for large emissions of carbon from dying forests. In: Kaaninen, M. (ed),Proceedings of the IPCC Workshop, Carbon Balance of World's Ecosystems: Toward a Global Assessment. Publications of the Academy of Finland, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  28. Olson, J.S., Olson J.A. Watts, J.A., and Allison, L.J.: 1983,Carbon in Live Vegetation of Major World Ecosystems, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL-5862, Oak Ridge.Google Scholar
  29. Prentice, K.C. and Fung, I.Y.: (1991,Nature 345, 48–50.Google Scholar
  30. Prentice, I.C., Cramer, W., Harrison, S.P., Leemans, R., Monserud, R.A. and Solomon, A.M.: 1992,J. Biogeog. 19, 117–134.Google Scholar
  31. Schlesinger, M.E. and Zhao, Z.C.: 1989,J. Climate 2, 429–495.Google Scholar
  32. Smith, T.M. and Shugart, H.H.: 1993,Nature 361, 523–526.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, T.M., Leemans, R. and Shugart, H.H.: 1992,Clim. Change 21, 367–384.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, T.M., Weishampel, J.F., Shugart, H.H. and Bonan, G.B.: 1993,Water, Air Soil Poll. 64, 307–326.Google Scholar
  35. Stephenson, N.L.: 1990,Amer. Natural. 135, 649–670.Google Scholar
  36. UNESCO.: 1981,Vegetation map of South America: Explanatory notes, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  37. Wetherald, R.T. and Manabe, S.: 1988,J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 1397–1415.Google Scholar
  38. White, F.: 1983,The vegetation of Africa, a descriptive memoir to accompany the UNESCO, AETFAT, UNESCO vegetation map of Africa, UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  39. Whittaker, R.H.: 1975,Communities and Ecosystems. 2nd Ed. Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  40. Woodward, F.I.: 1987,Climate and Plant Distribution, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  41. Zinke, P.J., Stangenberger, A.G., Post, W.M., Emanuel, W.R. and Olson, J.S.: 1984,Worldwide Organic Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Data, ORNL/TM-8857, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald P. Neilson
    • 1
  1. 1.U.S.D.A. Forest ServicePacific Northwest Research StationCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations