Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 70, Issue 1–4, pp 111–122 | Cite as

Agricultural sources and sinks of carbon

  • C. Vernon Cole
  • Klaus Flach
  • Jeffrey Lee
  • Dieter Sauerbeck
  • Bobby Stewart
Part II Workshop Working Group Papers

Abstract

Most existing agricultural lands have been in production for sufficiently long periods that C inputs and outputs are nearly balanced and they are neither a major source nor sink of atmospheric C. As population increases, food requirements and the need for more crop land increase accordingly. An annual conversion of previously uncultivated lands up to 1.5 × 107 hectares may be expected. It is this new agricultural land which suffers the greatest losses of C during and subsequent to its conversion. The primary focus for analysis of future C fluxes in agroecosystems needs to be on current changes in land use and management as well as on direct effects of CO2 and climate change. A valid assessment of C pools and fluxes in agroecosystems requires a global soils data base and comprehensive information on land use and management practices. A comprehensive effort to assemble and analyze this information is urgently needed.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bouwman, A.F.: 1990a, Global distribution of the major soils and land cover types, in: Bouwman, A.F. (ed),Soils and the Greenhouse Effect, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 33–59.Google Scholar
  2. Bouwman, A.F.: 1990b, Exchange of greenhouse gases between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere, in: Bouwman, A.F. (ed),Soils and the Greenhouse Effect, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 61–127.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, S., Hall, C.A.S., Knabe, W., Raich, J., Trexler, M.C., and Woomer, P.: (this volume).Tropical forests: Their past, present, and potential future role in the terrestrial carbon budget. Google Scholar
  4. Buringh, P.: 1984, Organic carbon in soils of the world, in: Woodwell, G.M. (ed),he Role of Terrestrial Vegetation in the Global Carbon Cycle, SCOPE 23, John Wiley & Sons, 247 p.Google Scholar
  5. CAST: 1992,Task Force Report No. 119, Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, Ames, Iowa. 96 p.Google Scholar
  6. Crosson, P.R.: 1992,United States Agriculture and Environment: Perspective in the next 20 years. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Duxbury, J.M., Harper, L.A. and Mosier, A.R.: 1993, Contributions of agroecosystems to global climate change, in: Harper, L.A., Mosier, A.R., Duxbury, J.M. and Rolston, D.E. (eds),Agricultural Ecosystem Effects on Trace Gases and Global Climate Change. ASA Special Publication Number 55,American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
  8. Eswaran, H., Van Den Berg, E. and Reich, P.: 1993,Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 192–194.Google Scholar
  9. Flach, K., Barnwell, T.O. and Crosson, P.: (in press), Impacts of agriculture on soil organic matter in the United States, in: Paul, E.A. and Elliott E.T. (eds),Soil Organic Matter in Temperate Agroecosystems, Lewis Press.Google Scholar
  10. Houghton, R.A., Skole, D.L. and Lefkowitz, D.S.: 1977,Forest Ecology and Management 38, 173–199.Google Scholar
  11. Isaksen, I.S.A, Ramaswamy V., Rodhe H. and Wigley T.M.L: 1992 Radiative Forcing of Climate, in: Houghton J.T., Callander, B.A. and Varney S.K. (eds),Climate Change 1992, Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–67.Google Scholar
  12. Kimble, J., Cook, T. and Eswaran, H.: 1990, Organic matter in soils of the tropics, in: Proc. Symp. Characterization and role of organic matter in different soils. Int. Congr. Soil Sci. 14th, Kyoto, Japan. 2–18 Aug. 1990. ISSS, Wageningen, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, J., Phillips, D. and Lin, R.: 1993,The effects of trends in tillage practices on erosion and carbon content of soils in the U.S. corn belt. Google Scholar
  14. Leggett, J., Pepper, W.J. and Swart R.J.: 1992, Emissions Scenarios for the IPCC: an Update, in: Houghton, J.T., Callander, B.A. and Varney, S.K. (eds),Climate Change 1992, Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–95.Google Scholar
  15. McElroy, M.B., Wolfsy, S.C. and Yung, Y.L.: 1977,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,277, 159–181.Google Scholar
  16. Mosier, A.R., Schimel, D.S., Valentine, D., Bronson, K. and Parton, W.J.: 1991,Nature 350, 330–332.Google Scholar
  17. Ojima, D.S., Valentine, D.W., Mosier, A.R., Parton, W.J. and Schimel, D.S.: 1993,Chemosphere 26, 675–685.Google Scholar
  18. Sampson, N.: 1993,Biomass management and energy.Google Scholar
  19. Sauerbeck, D.: 1993,CO 2-Emission from Agriculture: Sources and Mitigation Potentials.Google Scholar
  20. Sauerbeck, D.: 1992,IPCC Update WG III AFOS Section 2. Temperate Agricultural Systems.Google Scholar
  21. Schlesinger, W.H.: 1984, Soil organic matter: a source of atmospheric CO2, in: Woodwell, G.M. (ed),The Role of Terrestrial Vegetation in the Global Carbon Cycle, John Wiley & Sons, 247 p.Google Scholar
  22. Scholes, R.J. and Skole D.: (in prep.) Global soils data: a proposal for a synthesis task.Global Change Report No. 27, IGBP, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  23. Stewart, B.A.: 1993,Managing crop residues for the retention of carbon. Google Scholar
  24. Watson, R.T., Rodhe, H., Oeschger, H. and Siegenthaler, U.: 1990, Greenhouse Gases and Aerosols, in: Houghton, J.T., Jenkins G.J. and Ephraums, J.J. (eds),Ulimate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, pp. 5–40.Google Scholar
  25. Wilson, A.T.: 1978,Nature 273, 40–41.Google Scholar
  26. Wright, L. and Hughes, F.E. 1993,U.S. carbon offset potential using biomass energy systems.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Vernon Cole
    • 1
  • Klaus Flach
    • 2
  • Jeffrey Lee
    • 3
  • Dieter Sauerbeck
    • 4
  • Bobby Stewart
    • 5
  1. 1.USDA, Agricultural Research Service Natural Resource Ecology LaboratoryColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.HerndonUSA
  3. 3.U.S. EPA Environmental Research LaboratoryCorvallisUSA
  4. 4.BraunschweigGermany
  5. 5.USDA, Agricultural Research ServiceBushlandUSA

Personalised recommendations