Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 70, Issue 1–4, pp 71–94 | Cite as

Tropical forests: Their past, present, and potential future role in the terrestrial carbon budget

  • Sandra Brown
  • Charles A. S. Hall
  • Wilhelm Knabe
  • James Raich
  • Mark C. Trexler
  • Paul Woomer
Part II Workshop Working Group Papers

Abstract

In this paper we review results of research to summarize the state-of-knowledge of the past, present, and potential future roles of tropical forests in the global C cycle. In the pre-industrial period (ca. 1850), the flux from changes in tropical land use amounted to a small C source of about 0.06 Pg yr−1. By 1990, the C source had increased to 1.7 ± 0.5 Pg yr−1. The C pools in forest vegetation and soils in 1990 was estimated to be 159 Pg and 216 Pg, respectively. No concrete evidence is available for predicting how tropical forest ecosystems are likely to respond to CO2 enrichment and/or climate change. However, C sources from continuing deforestation are likely to overwhelm any change in C fluxes unless land management efforts become more aggressive. Future changes in land use under a “business as usual” scenario could release 41–77 Pg C over the next 60 yr. Carbon fluxes from losses in tropical forests may be lessened by aggressively pursued agricultural and forestry measures. These measures could reduce the magnitude of the tropical C source by 50 Pg by the year 2050. Policies to mitigate C losses must be multiple and concurrent, including reform of forestry, land tenure, and agricultural policies, forest protection, promotion of on-farm forestry, and establishment of plantations on non-forested lands. Policies should support improved agricultural productivity, especially replacing non-traditional slash-and-burn agriculture with more sustainable and appropriate approaches.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldhous, P.: 1993, Tropical deforestation: not just a problem in Amazonia,Science 259,1390.Google Scholar
  2. Andreae, M. O., E. V. Browell, M. Garstang, G. L. Gregory, R. C. Harriss, G. F. Hill, D.J. Jacob, M. C. Periera, G. W. Sachse, A. W. Setzer, P. L. Silva Dias, R. W. Talbot, A. L. Torres, S. C. Wofsy.: 1988, Biomass-burning emissions and associated haze layers over Amazonia.,Journal of Geophysical Research 93, 1509–1527.Google Scholar
  3. Box, E.: 1978, Geographical dimensions of terrestrial net and gross primary productivity,Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 15, 305–322.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, S., L. R. Iverson.: 1992, Biomass estimates for tropical forests,World Resource Review 4, 366–384.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, S., A. E. Lugo.: 1982, in Storage and production of organic matter tropical forests and their role in the global carbon cycle,Biotropica 14, 161–187.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, S., A. E. Lugo.: 1990, Tropical secondary forests,Journal of Tropical Ecology 6, 1–32.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, S., A. E. Lugo.: 1992, Aboveground biomass estimates for tropical moist forests of the Brazilian Amazon,Interciencia 17, 8–18.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, S., A. J. R. Gillespie, A. E. Lugo.: 1991, Biomass of tropical forests of south and southeast Asia,Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21, 111–117.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, S., L. R. Iverson, A. E. Lugo.: 1993, Land use and biomass changes in Peninsular Malaysia during 1972–82: a GIS approach, in V. Dale (ed),Effects of Land Use Change in Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations: Southeast Asia as a Case Study, Springer-Verlag, in press.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, S., A. E. Lugo, J. Chapman.: 1986, Biomass of tropical tree plantations and its implications for the global carbon budget,Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16, 390–394.Google Scholar
  11. Brown, S., A. E. Lugo, L. R. Iverson.: 1992, Processes and lands for sequestering carbon in the tropical forest landscape,Water, Air and Soil Pollution 64, 139–155.Google Scholar
  12. Cramer, W. P., A. M. Solomon.: 1993, Climatic classification and future global redistribution of agricultural land,Climate Research, in press.Google Scholar
  13. Crutzen, P. J., W. M. Hao, M. H. Liu.: 1989, Estimates of annual and regional releases of CO2 and other trace gases to the atmosphere from fires in the tropics based on FAO statistics for the period 1975 to 1980,Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Fire Ecology, Freiburg University, 16–20 May, 1989, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. Detwiler, R. P., C. A. S. Hall.: 1988, Tropical forests and the global carbon cycle,Science 239, 42–47.Google Scholar
  15. Dixon, R. K., P. E. Schroeder, J. K. Winjum (eds).: 1991.Assessment of PromisingForest Management Practices and Technologies for Enhancing the Conservation andSequestration of Atmospheric Carbon and Their Costs at the Site Level, EPA/600/3-91/067, US. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Deutscher Bundestag (ed).: 1990,Protecting the Tropical Forests a High-Priority International Task, 2nd Report of the Enquete-Commission, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  17. Eswaran, H., E. Van Den Berg, P. Reich.: 1993, Organic carbon in soils of the world,Soil Science Society of America Journal 57, 192–194.Google Scholar
  18. Fearnside, P. M.: 1992,Carbon Emissions and Sequestration in Forests: Case Studies from Seven Developing Countries, Volume 2: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon, LBL-32758 UC-402, Energy and Environment Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA.Google Scholar
  19. Flint, E. P., J. F. Richards.: 1993, Trends in carbon content of vegetation in South and Southeast Asia associated with changes in land use, in V. Dale (ed),Effects of Land Use Change in Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations: Southeast Asia as a Case Study, Springer-Verlag, in press.Google Scholar
  20. Graham, R. L., R. D. Perlack, A. M. G. Prasad, J. W. Ranney, D. B. Waddle.: 1990,Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Sub-Saharan Africa, ORNL-6640, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Grainger, A.: 1988, Estimating areas of degraded tropical lands requiring replenishment of forest cover,International Tree Crops Journal 5, 31–61.Google Scholar
  22. Grainger, A.: 1990, Modelling the impact of alternative afforestation strategies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, inProceedings of the Conference on Tropical Forestry Response Options to Global Climate Change, IPCC, Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, C, A. S., R. P. Detwiler, P. Bogdonoff, P. S. Underbill.: 1985, Land use change and carbon exchange in the tropics: I. Detailed estimates for Costa Rica, Panama, Peru, and Bolivia,Environmental Management 9, 313–334.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, C. A. S., M. R. Taylor, E. Everham.: 1992, A geographically-based ecosystem model and its application to the carbon balance of the Luquillo Forest, Puerto Rico,Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 64, 385–404.Google Scholar
  25. Hall, C. A. S., Uhlig, J.: 1991, Refining estimates of carbon released from tropical land-use change,Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21, 118–131.Google Scholar
  26. Houghton, J. T., B. A. Callander, S. K. Varney (eds).: 1992,Climate Change 1992, The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Houghton, R. A.: 1991, Tropical deforestation and atmospheric carbon dioxide,ClimaticChange 19, 99–118.Google Scholar
  28. Houghton, R. A.: 1992a, Tropical forests and climate, Paper presented at the International Workshop Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Southeast Asian Rain forests, October 12–14, 1992, Kuching, Sarawak.Google Scholar
  29. Houghton, R. A.: 1992b, Effects of land-use change, surface temperature, and CO2 concentration on terrestrial stores of C, Paper presented at IPCC meeting, October 1992, Woods Hole Research Center, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  30. Houghton, R. A., J. L. Hackler.: 1993, The net flux of carbon from deforestation and degradation in South and Southeast Asia, in V. Dale (ed),Effects of Land Use Change in Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations: Southeast Asia as a Case Study, Springer-Verlag, in press.Google Scholar
  31. Houghton, R. A., D. L. Skole. 1990.: Carbon, in: B. L. Turner, W. C. Clark, R. W. Kates, J. F. Richards, J. T. Matthews, and W. B. Meyer (eds),The Earth as Transformed by Human Action, Cambridge University Press, pp. 393–408.Google Scholar
  32. Houghton, R. A., R. D. Boone, J. R. Fruci, J. E. Hobbie, J. M. Melillo, C. A. Palm, B. J. Peterson, G. R. Shaver, G. M. Woodwell, B. Moore, D. L. Skole, N. Myers.: 1987, The flux of carbon from terrestrial ecosystems to the atmosphere in 1980 due to changes in land use: geographic distribution of the global flux,Tellus 39B, 122–139.Google Scholar
  33. Houghton, R. A., J. E. Hobbie, J. M. Melillo, B. Moore, B. J. Peterson, G. A. Shaver, G.M. Woodwell.: 1983, Changes in the carbon content of terrestrial biota and soils between 1860 and 1980: a net release of CO2 to the atmosphere,Ecological Monographs 53, 235–262.Google Scholar
  34. Houghton, R. A., D. S. Lefkowitz, D. L. Skole.: 1991a, Changes in the landscape of Latin America between 1850 and 1985, I. Progressive loss of forests,Forest Ecology and Management 38, 143–172.Google Scholar
  35. Houghton, R. A., D. L. Skole, D. S. Lefkowitz.: 1991b, Changes in the landscape of Latin America between 1850 and 1985, II. Net release of CO2 to the atmosphere,Forest Ecology and Management 38, 173–199.Google Scholar
  36. Houghton, R. A., J. Unruh, P. A. Lefebvre.: 1991c, Current land use in the tropics and its potential for sequestering C, inProceedings: Technical Workshop to Explore Options for Global Forestry Management, International Institute for Environment and Development, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 297–310.Google Scholar
  37. Idso, S. B.: 1988, Three phases of plant response to atmospheric CO2 enrichment,Plant Physiology 87, 5–7.Google Scholar
  38. Iverson, L. R., S. Brown, A. Prasad, H. Mitasova, A. J. R. Gillespie, A. E. Lugo.: 1993a, Use of GIS for estimating potential and actual biomass for continental South and Southeast Asia, in V. Dale (ed),Effects of Land Use Change in Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations: Southeast Asia as a Case Study, Springer-Verlag, in press.Google Scholar
  39. Iverson, L. R., S. Brown, A. Grainger, A. Prasad, D. Liu.: 1993b, Carbon sequestration in tropical Asia: an assessment of technically suitable forest lands using geographic information systems analysis,Climate Research, in press.Google Scholar
  40. Kimball, B. A., J. R. Mauney, F. S. Nakayama, S. B. Idso.: 1993, Effects of increasing atmospheric CO2 on vegetation,Vegetatio 104/105, 65–75.Google Scholar
  41. Knabe, W.: 1985, Effects of chemical air pollution on forests and other vegetation, in G. B. Marini Bettolo (ed),Chemical Events in the Atmosphere and their Impacts on the Environment, Pontificiae Academiae Scientiarum Scipta Varia 56, Rome.Google Scholar
  42. Knabe, W., P. Hennicke, W. Bach, M. Ganseforth, L. Hartenstein, V. Jung, M. Muller.: 1990, Supplementary opinion of the Enquete-Commission members on Part G, chapters 1–4, the causes of the destruction of tropical forests, in Deutscher Bundestag (eded),Protecting the Tropical Forests a High-Priority International Task, 2nd Report of the Enquete-Commission, Bonn, Germany, pp. 393–407.Google Scholar
  43. Korner, C., J. A. Arnone III.: 1992, Response of elevated carbon dioxide in artificial tropical ecosystems,Science 257,1672–1675.Google Scholar
  44. Larcher, W.: 1980,Physiological Plant Ecology, 2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  45. Leemans, R.: 1992, Modelling ecological and agricultural impacts of global change on a global scale,Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 51, 709–724.Google Scholar
  46. Lugo, A. E., S. Brown.: 1986, Steady state terrestrial ecosystems and the global carbon cycle,Vegetatio 68, 83–90.Google Scholar
  47. Lugo, A. E., S. Brown.: 1992, Tropical forests as sinks of atmospheric carbon,Forest Ecology and Management 54, 239–255.Google Scholar
  48. Lugo, A. E., S. Brown.: 1993, Management of tropical soils as sinks of atmospheric carbon,Plant and Soil, in press.Google Scholar
  49. Lugo, A. E., J. Wisniewski.: 1992, Natural sinks of CO2, conclusions, key findings and Research recommendations from the Palmas del Mar workshop,Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 64, 455–459.Google Scholar
  50. Norby, R. J., J. Pastor, J. M. Melillo.: 1986, Carbon-nitrogen interactions in CO2-enriched white oak: physiological and long-term perspectives,Tree Physiology 2, 233–241.Google Scholar
  51. Parton, W. J., D. S. Schimel, C. V. Cole, D. S. Ojima.: 1987, Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands,Soil Science Society of America Journal 51, 1173–1179.Google Scholar
  52. Peterson, B. J., J. M. Melillo.: 1985, The potential storage of carbon caused by eutrophication of the biosphere,Tellus 37B, 117–127.Google Scholar
  53. Prentice, I. C., W. Cramer, S. P. Harrison, R. Leemans, R. A. Monserud, A. M. Solomon.: 1992, A global biome model based on plant physiology and dominance, soil properties and climate,Journal of Biogeography 19, 117–134.Google Scholar
  54. Raich, J. W., W. H. Schlesinger.: 1992, The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate,Tellus 44B, 81–99.Google Scholar
  55. Raich, J. W., E. B. Rastetter, J. M. Melillo, D. W. Kicklighter, P. A. Steudler, B. J. Peterson, A. L. Grace, B. Moore III, C. J. Vorosmarty.: 1991, Potential net primary production in South America,Ecological Applications 1, 399–429.Google Scholar
  56. Raynaud, D., J. Jouzel, J. M. Barnola, J. Chappellaz, R. J. Delmas, C. Lorius.: 1993, The ice record of greenhouse gases,Science 259, 926–934.Google Scholar
  57. Richards, J. F., E. P. Flint.: 1993, A century of land use change in South and Southeast Asia, in V. Dale (ed),Effects of Land Use Change in Atmospheric CO 2 Concentrations: Southeast Asia as a Case Study, Springer-Verlag, in press.Google Scholar
  58. Rosenzweig, M. L.: 1968, Net primary productivity of terrestrial communities: prediction from climatological data,American Naturalist 102, 67–74.Google Scholar
  59. Sarmiento, J. L., J. C. Orr, U. Siegenthaler.: 1992, A perturbation simulation of CO2uptake in an ocean general circulation model.Journal of Geophysical Research 97, 3621–3645.Google Scholar
  60. Swift, M. J., P. Woomer.: 1993, Organic matter and the sustainability of agricultural systems: definition and measurement, in K. Mulongoy and R. Merckx (ed),Dynamics of Organic Matter in Relation to Sustainability of Agricultural Systems, J. Wiley and Sons, pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
  61. Tans, P. P., I. Y. Fung, T. Takahashi.: 1990, Observational constraints on the global atmospheric carbon dioxide budget,Science 247, 1431–1438.Google Scholar
  62. Taylor, J. A., J. Lloyd.: 1992, Sources and sinks of atmospheric CO2,Australian Journal of Botany 40, 407–418.Google Scholar
  63. Trexler, M. C., C. Haugen.: 1993,Keeping it Green: Evaluating Tropical Forestry Strategies to Mitigate Global Warming, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC, USA, in press.Google Scholar
  64. Whitmore, T. C.: 1984,Tropical Rain Forests of the Far East, 2nd Edition, Oxford Science Publication, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  65. Whittaker, R. H., G. E. Likens.: 1973, Carbon in the biota, in G. M. Woodwell and E. V. Pecan (eds),Carbon and the Biosphere, US Atomic Energy Commission, CONF-720510, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, USA, pp. 281–302.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Brown
    • 1
  • Charles A. S. Hall
    • 2
  • Wilhelm Knabe
    • 3
  • James Raich
    • 4
  • Mark C. Trexler
    • 5
  • Paul Woomer
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of ForestryUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental and Forest Biology, College of Environmental Science and ForestryState University of New YorkSyracuseUSA
  3. 3.Environmental Research and ConsultancyMuelheim an der RuhrGermany
  4. 4.Department of BotanyIowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  5. 5.Trexler and AssociatesOak GroveUSA
  6. 6.TSBF, c/o UNESCO-ROSTANairobiKenya

Personalised recommendations