Abstract
At the end of the 60's, Kreisel conjectured that formal arithmetics admit infinite induction rules if the lengths of proofs of their premises are uniformly bounded by the same number. By the length of a proof we mean the number of applications of axioms and rules of inference. In this article we construct a theory R * with a finite number of specific axioms. The language of R * contains a constant 0, a unary function symbol, equality, and ternary predicates for addition and multiplication. It is proved that for any consistent axiomatizable extension
R* it is possible to find a formula A(a) that satisfies the following conditions: a) ∀xA(x) cannot be derived in
; b) for any n the length of the proof of the formula A(0(n)) is no greater than c1[log2 (n+1)]+c2, where the constants c1 and c2 are independent of n. Here the expression 0(n) indicates 0 with n primes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
S. K. Kleene, Introduction to Metamathematics, Van Nostrand, New York (1952).
S. K. Kleene, Mathematical Logic, Wiley, New York (1967).
V. P. Orevkov, “Theorems with very short proofs can be strengthened,” Semiotika i Informatika, No. 12, 27–38 (1979).
V. P. Orevkov, “Elimination of cross sections for estimating proof lengths,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,296, No. 3, 539–542 (1987).
M. Davis, Yu. Matijasevič, and J. Robinson, “Hilbert's tenth problem. Diophantine equations: positive aspects of a negative solution,” in: Proc. Symp. Pure Math.,28, 323–378 (1976).
H. Friedman, “One hundred and two problems in mathematical logic,” J. Symb. Logic,40, No. 2, 113–129 (1975).
J. Krajíček, “Generalization of proofs,” in: Proc. Fifth Easter Conf. on Model Th., East Germany (1987).
R. J. Parikh, “Some results on the length of proofs,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.,177, 29–36 (1973).
D. Richardson, “Sets of theorems with short proofs,” J. Symb. Logic,39, No. 2, 235–242 (1974).
T. Yukami, “A note on formalized arithmetic with function symbols' and +,” Tsukuba J. Math.,2, 69–73 (1978).
T. Yukami, “Some results on speed-up,” Ann. Jpn. Assoc. Philos. Sci.,6, No. 4, 195–205 (1984).
Additional information
Translated from Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov Leningradskogo Otdeleniya Matematicheskogo Institua im. V. A. Steklova Akademii Nauk SSSR, Vol. 176, pp. 118–126, 1989.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orevkov, V.P. Remark on Kreisel's conjecture. J Math Sci 59, 850–855 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01104108
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01104108