Skip to main content
Log in

Who owes what, and to whom? Public debt, Ricardian equivalence, and governmental form

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Barro, Robert J. 1974. “Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?”Journal of Political Economy 82: 1095–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1979. “On the Determination of the Public Debt.”Journal of Political Economy 87: 940–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1989. “The Neoclassical Approach to Fiscal Policy.” In Robert J. Barro, ed.Modern Business Cycle Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Pp. 178–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. 1958.Public Principles of Public Debt. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M., and Jennifer Roback. 1987. “The Incidence and Effects of Public Debt in the Absence of Fiscal Illusion.”Public Finance Quarterly 15 (January): 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M., and Richard W. Wagner. 1977.Democracy in Deficit. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cukierman, Alex, and Allan H. Meltzer. 1989. “A Political Theory of Government Debt and Deficits in a Neo-Ricardian Framework.”American Economic Review 79: 713–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jasay, Anthony. 1985.The State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Viti de Marco, Antonio. 1936.First Principles of Public Finance. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, Jonathan, and Mark Gersovitz. 1981. “Debt with Potential Repudiation: Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.”Review of Economic Studies 48: 289–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, James M., ed. 1964.Public Debt and Future Generations. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Herschel I., and John B. Van Huyck. 1988. “Sovereign Debt as a Contingent Claim: Excusable Default, Repudiation, and Reputation.”American Economic Review 78: 1088–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, Abba P. 1948. “The Burden of the National Debt.” In Lloyd A. Metzler, ed.Income, Employment, and Public Policy. New York: W. W. Norton. Pp. 255–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, Ludwig von. 1966.Human Action. 3rd rev. ed. Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbard, Murray N. 1962.Man, Economy, and State. Los Angeles: Nash.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaventa, Luigi. 1988. “Introduction: Is There a Public Debt Problem in Italy?” In Francesco Giavazzi and Luigi Spaventa, eds.,High Public Debt: The Italian Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steadman, Charles W. 1993.The National Debt Conclusion. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, Gordon. 1987.Autocracy. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, Karen I., and Richard E. Wagner. 1992. “Public Debt Controversies: An Essay in Reconciliation.”Kyklos 45 (1): 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Richard E. 1986. “Liability Rules, Fiscal Institutions, and Public Debt.” In J. M. Buchanan, C. K. Rowley, and R. D. Tollison, eds.Deficits. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Pp. 199–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1988. “The Calculus of Consent: A Wicksellian Retrospective.”Public Choice 56 (February): 153–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, R.E. Who owes what, and to whom? Public debt, Ricardian equivalence, and governmental form. Rev Austrian Econ 9, 129–142 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01103333

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01103333

Keywords

Navigation