Abstract
This analysis of the social aspects of sexual relations between disabled and nondisabled persons attempts to raise several issues and problems which have been neglected or avoided in prior research. Particular emphasis is placed upon a candid examination of the reduced probabilities of marriage or sexual relationships, the vulnerability, and the potential exploitation of visibly disabled persons. This investigation appears to indicate a need for extended research on the social dimensions of sexuality and disability, an expanded discussion of this subject, a reexamination of personal values, and increased efforts to eliminate the legal and emotional vulnerability and exploitation of visibly disabled individuals in personal relationships.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gliedman, J, Roth W:The Unexpected Minority: Handicapped Children in America. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1980.
Fink, SL, Skipper, JK Jr, Hallenbeck PN: Physical disability and problems in marriage.Marriage and the Family 30:64–73, 1968.
Howards, I, Brehm, HP, Nagi, SZ:Disability: From Social Problem to Federal Program. New York, Praeger, 1980.
Nagi, SZ: The concept and measurement of disability. In ED Berkowitz (ed):Disability Policies and Government Programs. New York, Praeger, 1979, pp. 1–15.
Sha'ked, A: Editorial.Sexuality and Disability 1:3–5, 1978.
Becker, EF: Sexuality and the spinal-cord-injured woman in an interview.Sexuality and Disability 2:278–286, 1976.
Davidson, A, Venditti, V: Two clients views.Sexuality and Disability 2:23–27, 1979.
Ellis, RG: The corona-Frenulum trigger.Sexuality and Disability 3:50–56, 1980.
Berkowitz, M, Johnson, WG, Murphy, EH:Public Policy Toward Disability. New York, Praeger, 1976.
US Bureau of the Census. Census of the Population of 1970. Persons with work disability. Final report PC (2)-6c, Washington, D.C., U.S. Gov't Print Off. 1973.
Barron, E: The survey of low-income aged and disabled: Survey design and data system. InPolicy Analysis with Social Security Research Files. Washington, DC, US Gov't Print Off, 1978, pp. 433–446.
Goffman, E:Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall, 1963.
Morgan, ED, Hohman, GW, Davis, JE Jr: Psychosocial rehabilitation in VA spinal cord injury centers.Rehab Psych 21:3–33, 1974.
Barker, RG, Wright, BA, Meyerson, L, Gonick, MR:Adjustment to Physical Handicap and Illness: A Survey of the Social Psychology of Physique and Disability. New York, Social Science Research Council, 1953.
Schlesinger, HA: Living at home in Latin America. InModels of Service for the Multi-Handicapped Adult. New York, United Cerebral Palsy of New York City, 1973, pp. 41–55.
Wright, BA:Physical Disability: A Psychological Approach. New York, Harper and Row, 1960.
Battge L: The Chatterley syndrome. In P. Hunt (ed):Stigma: The Experience of Disability. London, Geoffrey Chapman, 1966, pp. 1–16.
Eareckson, J:Joni. Grand Rapids, Michigan, Zondervan, 1976.
McKee, JD:Two Legs to Stand On: My Battle with Cerebral Palsy. New York, Appleton-Century, Crofts, 1955.
Zahn, MA: Incapacity, impotence and invisible impairment: Their effects upon interpersonal relations.Health and Social Behavior 14:115–123, 1973.
English RW: Correlates of stigma toward physically disabled persons,Rehab Research and Practice Rev 2:1–17, 1971.
Yuker, HE, Block, JR, Young, JH:The Measurement of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons. Albertson, New York, 1970.
Ingwell, RH, Thoreson, RW, Smits, SJ: Accuracy of social perceptions of physically handicapped and non-handicapped persons.Social Psych 72:107–116, 1967.
Richardson, SA, Goodman, N, Hastrof, AH, Dornbusch, SM: Cultural uniformity in reactions to physical disabilities.Am Sociological Rev 26:241–247, 1961.
Goodman, N, Richardson, SA, Dornbusch, SM, Hastrof, AH: Varient reactions to physical disabilities.Am Sociological Rev 28:429–435, 1963.
Shim, N, Dole, AA: Components of social distance among college students and their parents in Hawaii.Social Psych 73:111–124, 1967.
Siller, J: Reactions to physical disability.Rehab Counsel Bulletin 7:2–16, 1963.
Nigro, G: Sexuality and the handicapped: Some observations on human needs and attitudes.Rehab Lit 36:202–205, 1975.
Safilios-Rothschild, C:The Sociology and Social Psychology of Disability and Rehabilitation. New York, Random House, 1970.
Wright, BA: Spread in adjustment to disability.Bulletin Menninger Clinic 28:198–208, 1964.
Davis F: Deviance disavowal: The management of strained interaction by the visibly handicapped.Social Problems 9:121–132, 1961.
Bennett, JW: Paternalism. In DL Sills (ed):International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York, Macmillan Co., 11:472–477, 1968.
Dunn, M, Lloyd EE, Phelps, GH: Sexual assertiveness in spinal cord injury.Sexuality and Disability 2:293–300, 1979.
Hicks, S: Relationship and sexual problems of the visually handicapped.Sexuality and Disability 3:165–176, 1980.
DeLoach, C, Greer, BG:Adjustment to Severe Physical Disability: A Metamorphosis. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1981.
Odgers, S: Five types of men disabled women should avoid.Accent on Living 24:72–76, 1979.
Neumann, RJ: The forgotten other: Women partners of spinal cord injured men, a preliminary report.Sexuality and Disability 2:287–292, 1979.
El Ghatit, AE, Hanson, RW: Marriage and divorce after spinal cord injury.Arch Phys Med Rehab 57:470–472, 1976.
Safilios-Rothschild, C: Prejudice against the disabled and some means to combat it.International Rehab Rev, 19:8–10, 15, 1968.
Deutsch, CP, Goldston, JA: Family factors in home adjustment of the severely disabled.Marriage and Family Living 22:312–316, 1960.
Skipper, JK, Jr, Fink, SL, Hallenbeck, PN: Physical disability among married women: Problems in the husband-wife relationship.J Rehab 34:16–19, 1968.
Hohmann, GW: Considerations in management of psychosexual readjustment in the cord injured male.Rehab Psych 19:50–58, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hahn, H. The social component of sexuality and disability: Some problems and proposals. Sex Disabil 4, 220–233 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01103307
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01103307