Skip to main content
Log in

Evapotranspiration and irrigation effeciency of mature orange orchards in Valencia (Spain)

  • Published:
Irrigation and Drainage Systems

Abstract

Actual evapotranspiration (ETc) of three mature sweet orange orchards (cv. Salustiana and Washington Navel on sour orange), under border irrigation and typical cultural practices was measured by the water balance method during 1981 to 1984. Soil water content was measured at 7 to 10 day intervals using a neutron meter and soil sampling of the 0–10 cm surface layer. Zero flux plane was calculated by measurements with mercury tensiometers. Irrigation water in these and other 5 similar orchards was measured by broad crested weirs. Rainfall and other climatic data for calculation of reference evapotranspiration by FAO's methods (ETo) were collected in a nearby meteorological station. Average yearly ETc ranged from 750 to 660 mm and mean monthly maximum was 3.7 and 3.2 mm/day in July for Salustiana and W. Navel orchards, respectively.

ETo estimates for the different methods used were highly correlated (r 2⩾0.94). Monthly crop coefficients (Kc) based on pan evaporation ranged from 0.5–0.6 in spring and summer to 0.8 in autumn and were about 10% higher than those for Penman or radiation methods. Average annual Kc for the three plots studied was 0.64, 0.61 and 0.51, respectively, and correlated well (r 2=0.99) with tree ground cover. Irrigation efficiency was about 50% for orchards with soils with less water holding capacity and more applied water per irrigation and 70–80% in orchards with deeper soils or with a higher water holding capacity. Increasing irrigation frequency and applying smaller amounts of water per irrigation with good uniformity can improve on-farm irrigation efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batchelor C.H. 1984. The accuracy of evapotranspiration estimated with the FAO modified Penman equation. Irrig. Sci. 5: 223–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bautista I., Cruz-Romero G., Castel J.R. & Ramos C. 1985. Spatial and time variability of soil moisture in citrus orchards as measured by neutron probe. Acta Horticulturae 171: 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booher L.J. 1974. Surface irrigation. FAO, Agric. Development Paper No. 95.

  • Bos M.G. & Nugteren J. 1978. On irrigation efficiencies. I.L.R.I., Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho-B. S.E. 1977. Some aspects of the stomatal behavior of citrus. Proc. Int. Soc. Citriculture 1: 66–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemmens A.J. & Reploge J.A. 1980. Constructing simple measuring flumes for irrigation canals. USDA Farmers Bull. No. 2268.

  • Daudet F.A. & Vachaud, G. 1977. La mesure neutronique du stock d'eau du sol et ses variations. Application à la détermination du bilan hydrique. Ann. Agron. 28: 503–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis S., Bingham F.T., Shade E.R. & Grass L.B. 1969. Water relations and salt balance of a 1000-acre citrus watershed. Proc. 1st. Int. Citrus Symp. 3: 1771–1777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J. & Pruitt W.O. 1977. Crop water requirements. FAO Irrig. Drain. Paper No. 24.

  • Frevert D.K., Hill R.W. & Braaten B.C. 1983. Estimation of FAO evapotranspiration coefficients, J. Irr. Drain. Eng. 109: 265–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greacen E.L., Correll R.L., Cunningham R.B., Johns G.G. & Nichols K.D. 1981. Calibration. In: Greacen E.L. (Ed) Soil Water Assessment by the Neutron Method. CSIRO, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green G.C., Burger W.P. & Conradie J. 1974. Lysimetric determination of citrus tree evaporation. Agrochemophysica 6: 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green G.C. & Moreshet S. 1979. An analysis of seasonal water use characteristics of Valencia orange trees in the Sundays River Valley. Crop. Prod. 8: 179–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi R. & Gerber J.F. 1967. Estimating evapotranspiration from citrus orchards with weather data. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 91: 173–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman G.J., Oster J.D. & Alves W.J. 1982. Evapotranspiration of mature orange trees under drip irrigation in an arid climate. Trans. ASAE 25: 992–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalma J.D. & Stanhill G. 1969. Transpiration, evaporation and deep drainage losses from an orange plantation. Israel J. Agric. Res. 19: 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khairi M.M.A. & Hall A.E. 1976. Temperature and humidity effects on net photosynthesis and transpiration of citrus. Physiol. Plant. 36: 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin Aranda J. & Muriel Fernandez J.L. 1973. Consumo de agua en una plantación de naranjo amargo (Citrus aurantium L.) plenamente desarrollada. Proc. I Congreso Mundial de Citricultura. Murcia. 1: 277–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan M. & Williams J.B. 1980. The water balance of an agricultural catchment. I. Estimation of evaporation from soil water records. J. Soil Sci. 31: 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman J.E. 1968. Estimating water needs of citrus orchards. Citrus Industry 19–24.

  • Ramos C., Castel J.R. & Gomez de Barreda D. 1986. Some aspects on the use of the neutron probe in irrigation and evapotranspiration studies. Acta Horticulturae (in press).

  • Replogle J.A. & Bos M.G. 1982. Flow measurement flumes: applications to irrigation water management. Advances in Irrigation 1: 147–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers J.S., Allen L.H. Jr., & Calvert D.V. 1983. Evapotranspiration from a humid-region developing citrus grove with grass cover. Trans. ASAE 26: 1778–1783, 1792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalhevet J., Mantell A., Bielorai H. & Shimsi D. 1976. Irrigation of field and orchard crops under semi-arid conditions. Int. Irrig. Info. Center. Publ. No. 1.

  • Sharma J.L. 1985. Estimating evapotranspiration. Advances in Irrigation 3: 213–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bavel C.H.M., Stirk G.B. & Brust K.J. 1968a. Hydraulic properties of a clay-loam soil and the field measurement of water uptake by roots. I. Interpretation of water content and pressure profiles. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 32: 310–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bavel C.H.M., Brust K.J. & Stirk G.B. 1968b. Hydraulic properties of a clay-loam soil and the field measurement of water uptake by roots. II. The water balance of the root zone. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 32: 317–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bavel C.H.M., Newman J.E. & Hilgeman R.H. 1967. Climate and estimated water use by an orange orchard. Agric. Meteorol. 4: 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss A. 1983. A quantitative approach to the Pruitt and Doorenbos version of the Penman equation. Irrig. Sci. 4: 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegand C.L. & Swanson W.A. 1982. Citrus responses to irrigation. I. Irrigation requirements: daily, monthly and annual evapotranspiration amounts and water management recomendations. J. Rio Grande. Valley Hort. Soc. 35: 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Castel, J.R., Bautista, I., Ramos, C. et al. Evapotranspiration and irrigation effeciency of mature orange orchards in Valencia (Spain). Irrig Drainage Syst 1, 205–217 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102930

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102930

Key words

Navigation