Skip to main content
Log in

Irrigation scheduling in a mature peach orchard using tensiometers and dendrometers

  • Published:
Irrigation and Drainage Systems

Abstract

Three trickle irrigation schedules, two of which were scheduled according to soil water potential (ψ soil) (tensiometer method) and daily stem contraction (DSC) (dendrometer method) respectively and the other one was a schedule of restricted water supply, were applied to a mature peach orchard.

The annual water application based on ψsoil was greater than that based on DSC. However, tree growth, fruit size and leaf water potential (ψleaf) on the trees in the dendrometer scheduling plot did not differ from those in the tensiometer scheduling plot while the premature fruit drop and fruit bud initiation were greatly different. The restricted water supply treatment limited significantly both tree and fruit growth. In addition, the lower ψleaf was observed on the trees in this plot.

Further study shows that use of the dendrometer method for scheduling irrigation satisfies the water needs of the plant and that the tensiometer method is less accurate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ψleaf:

leaf water potential

ψsoil:

soil water potential

DSC:

daily stem contraction

LVDT:

linear variable displacement transducer

PET:

potential evapotranspiration

References

  • Acquier C. 1986. Irrigation: Le goutte à goutte en question. Fruit et Légume 32: 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers D.J. & Wilson I.B. 1978. Productivity of peach tree: tree growth and water stress in relation to fruit growth and assimilate demand. Annals of Botany 42: 285–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decroix M. & Puech J. 1985. Le pilotage de l'irrigation à la parcelle. In: Les Besoins en Eau des Cultures. pp 693–742. Conférence Internationale Paris, 11–14, Sept. 1984. INRA-Press, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfving D.C. 1982. Crop response to trickle irrigation. Horticultural Reviews 4: 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnier E. 1985. Desséchement du sol et indicateurs physiologiques de l'état hydrique chez le Pêcher: application au déclenchement de l'irrigation. Docteur-ingénieur thesis. ENSA, Montpellier, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnier E. & Berger A. 1985. Testing water potential in peach tree as an indicator of water stress. Journal of Horticultural Science 60: 47–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hlavek R. 1984. L'irrigation en France — évolution des techniques et recherches d'accompagnement. CEMAGREF BI 318–319: 63–85.

  • Huguet J.G. 1985. Appréciation de l'état hydrique d'une plante à partir de variation micrométrique de la dimension des fruits ou des tiges au cours de la journée. Agronomie 5: 733–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huguet J.G. & Jaussely B. 1984. Mesures micrométriques des variations de dimensions de différents organes d'un arbre fruitier (tronc, tige, fruit) comme révélateur de son bilan hydrique. In: 4eme Colloque sur les Recherches Fruitières. pp 5–14. Bordeaux 1984: 28–29 Novembre. CTIFL and INRA press, Bordeaux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein I. 1983. Drip irrigation based on soil matric potential conserves water in peach and grape. HortScience 18: 942–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowski T.T. 1968. Diurnal changes in diameters of fruits and tree stems of montmorency cherry. Journal of Horticultural Science 43: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassoie J.P. 1973. Diurnal dimensional fluctuations in a douglas-fir stem in response to tree water status. Forest Science 19: 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penman H.L. 1948. Potential evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society T. 193: Londres.

  • Reeder B.D. 1979. Effect of trickle irrigation on peach trees. HortScience 14: 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roulot D., Villemin P., Marini P. & Jourdan O. 1981. Declenchement automatique de l'irrigation à partir de données tensiométriques ou climatiques (évaporation d'un bac “classe A”). Bulletin du GFHH (Groupe Français de l'Humidité Hydaulique) 9: 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholander P.F., Hammel H.T., Bradstreet E.D. & Hemmingsen E.A. 1965. Sap Pressure in vascular plants. Science 148: 339–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiloyannis C., Uriu K. & Martin G.C. 1980. Seasonal and diurnal variation in abscisic acid, water potential and diffusive resistance in leaves from irrigated and non-irrigated peach trees. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 105: 412–415.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, SH., Huguet, JG. & Bussi, C. Irrigation scheduling in a mature peach orchard using tensiometers and dendrometers. Irrig Drainage Syst 3, 1–12 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102813

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102813

Key words

Navigation