Skip to main content
Log in

Multidimensional scaling reliability in similarity judgments about environmental sentences

  • Note
  • Published:
Quality and Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this research was to analyze the stability of Multidimensional Scaling (MDS). The investigations on this topic include studies related to the assumptions of linearity and monotonicity and to the validity and reliability of MDS procedures. Centered in this last topic, a test of the reliability of MDS procedure was carried out. We employed a set of complex stimuli: 21 sentences related to environmental field. 40 subjects made similarity judgements about both pairs “sentence A — sentence B” and “sentence B — sentence A”, so obtaining one square matrix per subject. Each of these matrices was broken down into two triangular matrices that were scaled separately by INDSCAL. The coordinates of stimuli in both MDS solutions were correlated. The results show a significant correlation between the two solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cohen, H. S. & Jones, L. E. (1974). The effects of random error and subsampling of dimensions on recovery of configurations by nonmetric multidimensional scaling,Psychometrika 39: 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. S., Deutscher, T. & Ryans, A. B. (1976). Data quality, level of aggregation, and nonmetric multidimensional scaling solutions,Journal of Marketing Research 13: 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher, T. (1982). Issues in data collection and reliability in marketing multidimensional scaling studies. Implications for large stimulus sets, In R. G. Golledge & J. N. Rayner (eds.),Proximity and Preference: Problems in the Multidimensional Analysis of Large Date Sets, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong, H. (1983). Method of complete triads: An investigation of unreliability in multidimensional perception of nations,Multivariate. Behavioral Research 18: 85–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E. (1975a). On the robustness of multidimensional scaling techniques,Journal of Marketing Research 12: 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E. (1975b). Marketing applications of MDS: Asessment and outlook,Journal of Marketing 39: 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E., Carmone, F. J. & Smith, S. M. (1989).Multidimensional Scaling. Concepts and Applications, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. E. & Rao, V. R. (1970). Ratings scales and information recovery. How many scales and response categories to use?,Journal of Marketing 34: 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, M. A. (1982). Data collection effects on nonmetric multidimensional scaling solutions,Educational and Psychological Measurement 42(4): 1005–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A. K. & Pinson, C. (1976). The effect of order of presentation of similarity judgments on multidimensional scaling results: An empirical examination,Journal of Marketing Research 13: 435–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K. (1982). Structural reliability and stability of nonmetric conjoint analysis,Journal of Marketing Research 19: 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K. (1987). Validity and structural reliability of multidimensional scaling,Journal of Marketing Research 24: 164–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • MDS (1981).MDS Package User Manual, University of Edinburgh: Program Library Unit.

  • Moore, W. L. & Lehmann, D. R. (1982). Effects of usage and name on perceptions of new products,Marketing Science 1: 351–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1969). Some principles and prospects for the spatial representations of behavioral science data. Advanced Research Seminar on Scaling and Measurement, Newport Beach, California.

  • Spence, I. & Lewandowsky, S. (1989). Robust multidimensional scaling,Psichometrika 54(3): 501–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, I. & Ogilvie, J. C. (1973). A table of expected stress values for random rankings in nonmetrics multidimensional scaling,Multivariate Behavioral Research 8: 511–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J. O. & MacKay, D. B. (1976). On the validity and reliability of direct similarity judgments.Journal of Marketing Research 13: 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, J. O. & MacKay, D. B. (1977). On establishing convergent validity: A reply to Wilkes and Wilcox,Journal of Marketing Research 14: 263–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weksel, W. & Ware, E. (1967). The reliability and consistency of complex personality judgments,Multivariate Behavioral Research 2: 537–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, R. E. & Wilcox, J. B. (1977). On the validity and reliability of direct similarity judgments: A comment,Journal of Marketing Research 14: 261–262.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Correa, AD., Díaz, J., Suárez, E. et al. Multidimensional scaling reliability in similarity judgments about environmental sentences. Qual Quant 27, 201–209 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102733

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102733

Key words

Navigation