Skip to main content
Log in

Final compactness and separability in regular symmetrizable spaces

  • Published:
Journal of Soviet Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1966 A. V. Arkhangel'skii posed the following question: Is it true that every regular finally compact symmetrizable space is separable? S. I. Nedev soon showed that a regular finally compact symmetrizable space is hereditarily finally compact. Consequently any counterexample to Arkhangel'skii's conjecture must be an L-space. Applying the technique of iterated forcing we prove that in the axiom systemZFC for set theory it is consistent to assume the existence of a regular (hereditarily) finally compact symmetrizable space X that is nonseparable. Thus it is impossible to prove using the axiom systemZFC that every regular finally compact symmetrizable space is separable. The space X has additional properties as well: it has a basis consisting of open/closed sets (i.e., it is zero-dimensional in the sense ofind, it can be mapped continuously and one-to-one onto a separable metric space, it is α-left and has cardinality ω1. Bibliography: 25 titles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. P. S. Aleksandrov and V. V. Nemytskii, “Conditions for metrizability of topological spaces and the axiom of symmetry,”Mat. Sb.,3, No. 3, 663–672 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. V. Arkhangel'skii, “The behavior of metrizability under quotient mappings,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,164, No. 2, 247–250 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. V. Arkhangel'skii, “Mappings and spaces,”Usp. Mat. Nauk,21, No. 4, 133–184 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. V. Arkhangel'skii, “The structure and classification of topological spaces and cardinal invariants,”Usp. Mat. Nauk,33, No. 6, 29–84 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. V. Arkhangel'skii, Appendix to the Russian translation of Kelley'sGeneral Topology, Moscow (1981).

  6. A. V. Arkhangel'skii and V. I. Ponomarev,Fundamentals of General Topology: Problems and Exercises, Dordrecht, Boston (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ya. A. Kofner, “On a new class of spaces and some problems from the theory of symmetrizability,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,187, No. 2, 270–273 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ya. A. Kofner, “On two problems from the theory of symmetrizability,”Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Ser. Math., Phys., et Astr.,18, No. 2, 81–87 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. J. Cohen,Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis, Benjamin, New York (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. I. Malykhin, “Topology and forcing,”Usp. Mat Nauk,38, No. 1, 69–118 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. I. Nedev, “Symmetrizable spaces and final compactness,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk,175, No. 3, 532–534 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. I. Nedev, “O-metrizable spaces,”Tr. Mosk. Mat. Obshch., No. 24, 201–236 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. I. Nedev, and M. M. Choban, “Toward a theory ofO-metrizable spaces. II”Vest. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 1, Mat., Mekh., No. 2, 10–17 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Handbook of Mathematical Logic [in Russian], Part II, Set Theory, Moscow (1982).

  15. M. G. Tkachenko, “On bicompactness of countably compact spaces having an additional structure,”Tr. Mosk. Mat Obshch., No. 46, 145–163 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Engelking,Outline of General Topology, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. K. Burke and S. W. Davis, “Questions on symmetrizable spaces,”Questions and Answers in General Topology,1, No. 2, 113–118 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. W. Davis, “Cauchy conditions on symmetrics,”Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.,86, No. 2, 349–352 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. I. Juhász, Z. Nagy, and Z. Szentmiklóssy, “A symmetrizable Hausdorff space that is Lindelöf but not separable,”C. R. Acad. Bulgare Sci.,38, No. 5, 537–538 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. Kunen,Set Theory. An Introduction to Independence Proofs, Amsterdam (1980).

  21. V. V. Niemytzki, “On the ‘third axiom of metric spaces’,”Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,29, 507–513 (1927).

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. V. Niemytzki, “Über die Axiom des metrischen Räumes,”Math. Ann.,104, No. 5, 666–671 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Shelah,Proper Forcing, Berlin (1982).

  24. F. Siwiec, “Generalizations of the first axiom of countability,”Rocky Mountain J. Math.,5, 1–60 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  25. S. Todorčević, “Forcing positive partition relations,”Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,280, 703–720 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated fromTrudy Seminara imeni I. G. Petrovskogo, No. 15, pp. 196–220.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shakhmatov, D.B. Final compactness and separability in regular symmetrizable spaces. J Math Sci 60, 1796–1815 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102591

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01102591

Keywords

Navigation