Advertisement

Sexuality and Disability

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 259–267 | Cite as

Psychogenic impotence: Is it possible to differentiate it from organic impotence with personality, psychopathological and defensive indexes?

  • A. Orlandinim
  • P. Rizzi
  • A. Fossati
  • M. A. Parlangeli
  • F. Montorsi
  • G. Guazzoni
  • L. Ferini-Strambi
  • C. Maffei
Article

Abstract

In this study, the authors compared 2 samples of patients suffering from organic (N.29) and psychogenic (N.52) erectile dysfunction, with the aim of identifying psychological dimensions which could differentiate between the two samples and adequate psychometric instruments to measure them. The following evaluation scales were used: Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire— Revised (PDQ-R), Symptom Check List 90 (SCL-90) and Defense Style Questionnaire—Short Form (DSQ-SF) in order to assess personality traits, psychiatric symptoms and defensive styles, respectively. PDQ-R, SCL-90 and DSQ-SF were found to be inadequate to differentiate between the two samples of psychogenically and organically impotent patients. Moving from this negative result the authors formulate some hypothesis on the possibility and the opportunity of research on this direction, and on the possible meaning of psychogenic impotence.

Keywords

Personality Trait Erectile Dysfunction Psychiatric Symptom Impotence Psychological Dimension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised, Washington D.C., 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrews G., Pollock C. & Stewart G. The Determination of Defense Style by Questionnaire. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1989, 46, 455–460.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beutler L.E., Karacan I., Anch A.M., Salis P.J., Scott F.B. & Williams R.L. MMPI and MIT discriminators of biogenic and psychogenic impotence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1975, 43, 899–903.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bond M., Perry J.C., Gautier M., Goldenberg M., Oppenheimer J. & Simand J. Validating the self-report of defense styles. Journal of Personality Disorders, 1989, 3, 101–112.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Camic P.M. Differentiating organic and psychogenic erectile dysfunction with the Millon Behavior Health Inventory, Sexuality and Disability, 1983, 6, 145–149.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Derogatis L.R., Lipman P.S. & Covi L. SCL-90: An outpatient psychiatric rating scale. Preliminary Report. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 1973, 9, 13–28.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Derogatis L.R., Meyer J.K., Dupkin C.N. Discrimination of organic versus psychogenic impotence with DSFI. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 1976, 2, 229–240.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fisher C., Schiavi R.C., Lear H., Davis D.M., Witkin A.P: The assessment of nocturnal REM erection in the differential diagnosis of sexual impotence. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. 1975, 1:277.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hunt C Andrews G. Measuring Personality Disorder: the use of self report questionnaire. Journal of Personality Disorders, 1992, 6 (2) 125–133.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hyler S.E. & Rieder O.R. PDQ-R: Personality Disorders Questionnaire—Revised, New York: New York Psychiatric Institute, 1987.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hyler S.E. & Rieder R.O., Williams J.B.W., Spitzer R.L., Hendler J., Lyons M. The Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire: Development and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Disorders. 1988, 2, 229–237.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hyler S.E., Rieder R.O., Williams J.B.W., Spitzer R.L., Lyons M., Hendler J. A comparison of clinical and self-report diagnoses of DSM III Personality Disorders in 552 patients. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 1989, 30, 170–178.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hyler S.E., Skodol A.E., Kellman H.D., Oldham J.M., Rosnick L. Validity of the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire—Revised: comparison with two structured interviews. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1990, 147, 1043–1048.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaplan H.S. The illustrated manual of sex therapy (second edition). Mark Paterson and Brunnel/Mazel Inc. 1975, 1987.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karacan I., Salis P.J., Williams R.C.: The role of the sleep laboratory in diagnosis and treatment of impotence. In: Sleep Disorders: Diagnosis and Treatment. Edited by R.C. Williams, I. Karacan. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. part III chapt. 14, 353–381, 1978.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kockott G., Feil W., Revenstorf J. & Besinger U. Symptomatology and psychological aspects of male sexual inadequacy: results of an experimental study. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 1980, 9, 457–475.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levenson H., Olkin R., Herzoff N., Delancy M. MMPI evaluation of erectile dysfunction: failure of organic vs. psychogenic decision rules. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1986, 46, 752–754.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marshall P., Surridge D., Delva N. Differentiation of organic and psychogenic impotence on the basis of MMPI decision rules. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980, 48, 407–408.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin L.M., Rodgers D.A., Montague D.K. Psychometric differentiation of biogenic and psychogenic impotence. Archives of Sexual Behaviour, 1983, 12, 475–485.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Melman A. & Redfield J. Evaluation of the DSFI as a test of organic impotence. Sexuality Disability, 1981, 4, 108–114.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Padma-Nathan, H. Evaluation of the veno corporal veno-occlusive mechanism: dynamic infusion cavernosometry cavernosography, Semin. Interven. Radiol., 1989, 6:205.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Perconte S.T., Griger M.L. & Bellucci G. Psychometric evaluation of biogenic versus psychogenic erectile dysfunction. Annals of Sex Research, 1989, 2, 335–344.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reid K., Surridge D., Harris C., Condra M., Fenemore J., Owen J. & Morales A. The psychological correlates of psychogenic impotence: a retrospective comparison of psychogenically and organically impotent men. Sexuality and Disability, 1987, vol.8, 3–16.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Segraves R.T., Schoenberg H.W., Zarins C.K., Knopf J. & Camic P. Discrimination of organic versus psychogenic impotence with the DSFI; a failure to replicate. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 1981, 7, 230–238.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Segraves K.A. & Segraves R.T. Differentiation of biogenic and psychogenic impotence with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and the Inventory of Sexual Attitudes. Personal and Individual Differences, 1986, 7, 425–432.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Segraves R.T. Discrimination between psychogenic and biogenic impotence utilizing psychometric instruments. Sexuality and Disability, 1987, 8, 138–142.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Staples R.B., Ficher I.V., Shapiro M., Martin K. & Gonick P.A. reevaluation of MMPI discriminators of biogenic and psychogenic impotence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1980, 48, 543–545.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Orlandinim
    • 1
  • P. Rizzi
    • 1
  • A. Fossati
    • 1
  • M. A. Parlangeli
    • 1
  • F. Montorsi
    • 2
  • G. Guazzoni
    • 2
  • L. Ferini-Strambi
    • 3
  • C. Maffei
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy UnitNeuropsychic Science Department—H S. Raffaele Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere ScientificoItaly
  2. 2.Department of UrologyNeuropsychic Science Department—H S. Raffaele Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere ScientificoItaly
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyNeuropsychic Science Department—H S. Raffaele Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere ScientificoItaly
  4. 4.Università degli Studi di MilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations