The Review of Austrian Economics

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 31–65

The theory of the firm: The Austrians as precursors and critics of contemporary theory

  • Nicolai Juul Foss
Articles

Conclusion

In the above, I have taken the theme of Austrian economics and economic organization through several variations. I hope to have taken steps towards establishing that not only were the Austrians important precursors of the contemporary theory of economic organization, but they may also contribute to existing theory as well as provide their distinctive perspective on economic organization. Space limitations have dictated, however, that I have been able to only scratch the surface. Assuredly, there is much more to be done on all the three themes I have been discussing, particularly on the last, constructive one.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchian, Armen A. 1984. “Specificity, Specialization, and Coalitions.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 140: 34–49.Google Scholar
  2. Alchian, Armen A., and Harold Demsetz. [1972] 1977. “Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization.” In Armen A. Alchian,Economic Forces at Work. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alchian, Armen A., and Susan Woodward 1988. “The Firm is Dead; Long Live the Firm.”Journal of Economic Literature 26: 65–79.Google Scholar
  4. Barney, Jay B., and William G. Ouchi, eds. 1988.Organizational Economics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Barzel, Yoram. 1987. “The Entrepreneur's Reward for Self-Policing.”Economic Inquiry 25: 103–16.Google Scholar
  6. Barzel, Yoram. 1989.Economic Analysis of Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boudreaux, Don, and Randall G. Holcombe. 1989. “The Coasian and Knightian Theories of the Firm.”Managerial and Decision Economics 10: 147–54.Google Scholar
  8. Buchanan, James M. 1969.Cost and Choice. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
  9. Cheung, S. N. S. 1983. “The Contractual Nature of the Firm.”Journal of Law and Economics 26: 1–22.Google Scholar
  10. Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” In Barney and Ouchi 1988.Google Scholar
  11. —— 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost.”Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.Google Scholar
  12. —— 1988. “The Nature of the Firm: Origin.”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 4: 3–17.Google Scholar
  13. Demsetz, Harold. 1967. “Toward a Theory of Property Rights.” InOwnership, Control and the Firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. ——. 1969. “Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint.”Journal of Law and Economics 12: 1–22.Google Scholar
  15. ——. 1988. “The Theory of the Firm Revisited.”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 4: 141–62.Google Scholar
  16. Douma, Sytse, and Hein Schreuder. 1991.Economic Approaches to Organizations. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Eggertson, Thráinn. 1990.Economic Behavior and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fama, Eugene F. 1980. “Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.”Journal of Political Economy 88: 288–307.Google Scholar
  19. Foss, Nicolai J. 1991. “The Suppression of Evolutionary Approaches in Economics: The Case of Marshall and Monopolistic Competition.”Methodus 3 (December): 65–72.Google Scholar
  20. —— 1993a. “More on Knight and the Theory of the Firm.”Managerial and Decision Economics 14 (July): 269–76.Google Scholar
  21. —— 1993b. “Theories of the Firm: Contractual and Competence Perspectives.”Journal of Evolutionary Economics 3 (June): 127–44.Google Scholar
  22. ——. 1993c. “The Two Coasian Traditions.”Review of Political Economy 4 (December): 508–32.Google Scholar
  23. Grossman, Sanford J., and Oliver D. Hart. 1986. “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership.”Journal of Political Economy 94: 671–719.Google Scholar
  24. Hayek, Friedrich A. von. 1931.Prices and Production. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. ——. 1935a. “Socialist Calculation I: The Nature and History of the Problem.” In Hayek 1948.Google Scholar
  26. ——. 1935b. “Socialist Calculation II: The State of the Debate.” In Hayek 1948.Google Scholar
  27. ——. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” In Hayek 1948.Google Scholar
  28. ——. 1940. “Socialist Calculation III: The Competitive Solution.” In Hayek 1948.Google Scholar
  29. ——. 1941.The Pure Theory of Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. ——. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” In Hayek 1948.Google Scholar
  31. ——. 1948.Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. ——. [1968] 1978. “Competition as a Discovery Procedure.” InNew Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. ——. 1973.Law, Legislation and Liberty. Vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1988.Economics and Institutions. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  35. Holmström, Bengt R., and Jean Tirole. 1989. “The Theory of the Firm.” InHandbook of Industrial Organization. R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig, eds. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  36. Ikeda, Sanford. 1990. “Market Process Theory and ‘Dynamic’ Theories of the Market.”Southern Economic Journal 57: 75–92.Google Scholar
  37. Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. “The Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure.” In Barney and Ouchi 1988.Google Scholar
  38. Kirzner, Israel M. 1973.Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. —— 1979.Perception, Opportunity and Profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Knight, Frank H. [1921] 1965.Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  41. —— [1924] 1952. “Some Fallacies in the Interpretation of Social Cost.” InReadings in Price Theory. G. J. Stigler and K. E. Boulding, eds. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
  42. Lachmann, Ludwig M. 1971.The Legacy of Max Weber. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  43. —— 1986.The Market As An Economic Process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  44. Lange, Oskar. 1938. “On the Economic Theory of Socialism.” InOn the Economic Theory of Socialism. B. Lippincott, ed. St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  45. Langlois, Richard N., ed. 1986.Economics as a Process: Essays in the New Institutional Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. ——. 1991. “Institutions.” InAustrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions. Bruce Caldwell and Stephan Böhm, eds. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  47. Lavoie, Don. 1985.Rivalry and Central Planning: The Socialist Calculation Debate Reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Littlechild, Stephen C. 1986. “Three Types of Market Process.” In Langlois 1986.Google Scholar
  49. Loasby, Brian J. 1989.The Minds and Methods of Economists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Machlup, F. 1967. “Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behavioral, Managerial.”American Economic Review 57: 1–33.Google Scholar
  51. McNulty, Paul J. 1984. “On the Nature and Theory of Economic Organization: The Role of the Firm Reconsidered.”History of Political Economy 16: 233–53.Google Scholar
  52. Malmgren, H. B. 1961. “Information, Expectations and the Theory of the Firm.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 75: 399–421.Google Scholar
  53. Menger, Carl. [1871] 1976.Principles of Economics. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  54. —— [1883] 1963.Problems of Economics and Sociology. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  55. Milgrom, Paul. 1988. “Employment Contracts, Influence Activities and Efficient Organization Design.”Journal of Political Economy 96: 42–60.Google Scholar
  56. Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. 1992.Economics, Organization, and Management. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  57. Minkler, Alanson P. 1991. “The Problem With Knowledge: An Essay on the Theory of the Firm.” Manuscript. University of Connecticut: Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  58. Mises, Ludwig von. [1920] 1990.Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth. Auburn, Ala.: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  59. ——. [1936] 1981.Socialism. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
  60. ——. 1945.Bureaucracy. London: William Hodge.Google Scholar
  61. ——. 1949.Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. London: William Hodge.Google Scholar
  62. Nelson, Richard R. 1981. “Assessing Private Enterprise: An Exegesis of Tangled Doctrine.”Bell Journal of Economics 12: 93–111.Google Scholar
  63. Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney G. Winter. 1982.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  64. O'Driscoll, Gerald P. and Mario Rizzo. 1985.The Economics of Time and Ignorance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  65. Penrose, Edith T. 1959.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Ricketts, Martin 1987.The Economics of Business Enterprise. Brighton, England: Wheatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
  67. Rothbard, Murray N. [1962] 1970.Man, Economy, and State. Vol. 2. Los Angeles: Nash.Google Scholar
  68. Salerno, Joseph T. 1990. “Ludwig von Mises as Social Rationalist.”Review of Austrian Economics 4: 26–54.Google Scholar
  69. Silver, Morris. 1984.Enterprise and the Scope of the Firm. Aldershot: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  70. Simon, Herbert A. 1979. “Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations.”American Economic Review 69: 493–513.Google Scholar
  71. —— 1991. “Organizations and Markets.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 25–44.Google Scholar
  72. Thomsen, Esteban F. 1989.Prices and Knowledge: A Market-Process Perspective. Doctoral Dissertation. New York University.Google Scholar
  73. Vaughn, Karen I. 1982. “Does it Matter That Costs are Subjective?”Southern Economic Journal 49 (December): 702–15.Google Scholar
  74. Williamson, Oliver E. 1975.Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  75. —— 1985.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  76. —— 1991. “Economic Institutions: Spontaneous and Intentional Governance.”Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 7: 159–87.Google Scholar
  77. Witt, Ulrich. 1987. “How Transaction Rights Are Shaped to Channel Innovativeness.”Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 143: 180–95.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ludwig von Mises Institute 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolai Juul Foss
    • 1
  1. 1.the Institute of Industrial Economics and Strategy at the Copenhagen Business SchoolDenmark

Personalised recommendations