Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Legal deduction, legal predicates and expert systems

  • Debate
  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Edinburgh, UK

    Neil MacCormick

Authors
  1. Neil MacCormick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Much of the text which follows was first presented to the Conference of the Legal Expert System Association at Meiji Gakuin University, Tokyo, in August 1987, and followed by a similar argument, slightly differently angled, at a Symposium in honour of Ota Weinberger in Graz, whose proceedings remain for the moment unpublished. I have also received valuable criticisms through discussions of the latter version at meetings of an Esprit Working Group on Foundations of Legal Reasoning convened by Dr. Tim Flanagan of Cambridge, 1988–91.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MacCormick, N. Legal deduction, legal predicates and expert systems. Int J Semiot Law 5, 181–202 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101868

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101868

Keywords

Search

Navigation