Abstract
For the purpose of vegetation monitoring, three methods for estimating plant cover, namely visual-estimate (VE), point-frequency (PF) and subplot-frequency (SF), were compared with regard to accuracy, precision, sensitivity and time consumption. The cover estimates by the three methods were compared with ‘true’ values measured on photographs using an image analysis technique. VE had the highest accuracy, precision and sensitivity. PF systematically overestimated cover. The greatest drawback of PF was the low sensitivity to species detection. It failed to detect 22–30% of the species in two forests and a bog. SF has high precision and sensitivity but low accuracy. Time consumption on one quadrat was about 6 min for VE and SF, 8.5 min for PF. Inter- and intra-person error with the three methods depends on plants. Inter-person error with VE was slightly greater for small and wide-spread plants, especially mosses, than for other life-forms. For wide-spread plants, intra-person error was slightly greater with PF than with the other methods. VE and PF are strongly correlated and convertible, but SF is neither correlated nor convertible with the other methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dethier, M. N., Graham, E. S., Cohen, S. and Tear, L. M.: 1993, ‘Visual Versus Random — Point Percent Cover Estimations — Objective is Not Always Better’,Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 96, 93–100.
Floyd, D. A. and Anderson, J. E.: 1987, ‘A Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating Plant Cover’,J. Ecol. 75, 221–228.
Goldsmith, F. B. and Harrison, C. M.: 1976, ‘Description and Analysis of Vegetation’, in S. B. Chapman (ed.),Methods in Plant Ecology, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 85–155.
Goodall, D. W.: 1952, ‘Some Considerations in the Use of Point Quadrats for the Analysis of Vegetation’,Australian J. Sci., Res., Series B,5, 1–41.
Hope-Simpson, J. F.: 1940, ‘On the Errors in the Ordinary Use of subjective Frequency Estimations in Grassland’,J. Ecol. 28, 193–209.
Jonasson, S.: 1988, ‘Evaluation of the Point Intercept Method for the Estimation of Plant Biomass’,Oikos 52, 101–106.
Kershaw, K. A.: 1973,Quantitative and Dynamic Plant Ecology, Edward Arnold, London.
Kleemola, S. and Söderman, G.: 1993,Manual for Integrated Monitoring. Programme Phase 1993–1996, Environment Data Centre, National Board of Waters and the Environment. Helsinki.
PCI: 1993, EASI/PACE Remote Sensing Software (v. 5.1), Toronto, Canada.
Smith, A. D.: 1944, ‘A Study of the Reliability of Range Vegetation Estimates’,Ecology 25, 441–448.
Sykes, J. M., Horrill, A. D. and Mountford, M. D.: 1983, ‘Use of Visual Cover Assessments as Quantitative Estimators of Some British Woodland Taxa’,J. Ecol. 71, 437–450.
Tonten, T.: 1990, ‘Inter-Observer Variation in Forest Vegetation Cover Assessments’,Silva Fennica,24, 189–196.
Thomas, A. S.: 1960, ‘Changes in Vegetation Since Advent of Myxomatosis’,J. Ecol. 48, 287–306.
Warren Wilson, J.: 1960, ‘Inclined Point Quadrats’,New Phytol. 59, 1–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bråkenhielm, S., Qinghong, L. Comparison of field methods in vegetation monitoring. Water Air Soil Pollut 79, 75–87 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01100431
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01100431