Abstract
In combination, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) are innovative and aggressive efforts to move US cities toward integrated transportation and air quality planning. Under these complementary laws, air quality has become a major national transportation goal. In areas with serious air pollution, air quality will be a major consideration in determining the future shape of urban transportation.
This paper considers how the CAAA and ISTEA combine to provide an innovative national policy approach of interest to countries seeking to encourage sustainable development in urban centers. The CAAA mandates measurable and enforceable air quality targets. Nation-wide standards are set for acceptable levels of carbon monoxide, ground level ozone, and small particulates. ISTEA includes directions for transportation planners and decision-makers to follow to reach air quality and other goals — transportation planning must emphasize system efficiency, and for cities with severe air pollution, transportation projects are expected to contribute to cleaner air. Each urban area has flexibility in how it applies this framework to reflect its priorities and solve its problems. Strict federal sanctions provide incentives for compliance with both laws.
Enactment of these laws has produced a period of transition and uncertainty as well as of challenge and opportunity for planners and elected officials. The next several years, the US will provide one national laboratory and over 100 different urban laboratories for innovative approaches to integrate transportation and environmental policies to resolve major urban problems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CAAA:
-
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
- CO:
-
Carbon monoxide
- ECO:
-
Employee Commute Option
- EPA:
-
US Environmental Protection Agency
- HC:
-
Transportation hydrocarbons
- I/M:
-
Inspections and maintenance program
- ISTEA:
-
Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991
- MPO:
-
Metropolitan planning organizations
- NOx :
-
Nitrogen oxides
- PPM:
-
Parts per million
- PM10 :
-
Small particulate matter
- SIP:
-
State Implementation Plan
- TIP:
-
Transportation Improvement Program
- TCM:
-
Transportation control measures
- VMT:
-
Vehicle miles traveled
References
Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation (1992)Summary of Transportation Programs and Provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
Federal Register, 23 CFR Parts 450 and 49 CFR Part 613Statewide Planning; Metropolitan Planning Final Rule, October 28, 1993.
Federal Register, 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93,Air Quality: Transportation Plans, Programs, and Projects; Federal or State Implementation Plan Conformity Final Rule, November 24, 1993.
Lyons W et al. (1992–1994) Reviews of the Transportation Planning Process in the Kansas City, Chicago, Los Angeles, Pittsburgh, Houston, Twin Cities, Portland, Sacramento, and Denver Metropolitan Areas, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, RSPA, US Department of Transportation, RSPA/VNTSC-SS-TM392-01-05 and TM-492-01-06-09.
Lyons W (1994) The FTA-FHWA MPO Reviews — Planning Practice Under the ISTEA and the CAAA. To be published in the Transportation Research Record Transportation Research Board. Washington, DC.
OECD Group on Urban Affairs and ECMT Committee of Deputies. Project Group on Urban Travel and Sustainable Development (1993)Draft Final Report Paris, France.
US Department of Transportation (1990)National Transportation Strategic Planning Study.
US Environmental Protection Agency (1991)Draft 1991 Transportation — Air Quality Planning Guidelines June 1991.
US Environmental Protection Agency (1992)Urban Air Quality Trends Report October 1992.
Weiner E (1992)Urban Transportation Planning in the United States. US DOT, DOT-T-93-02.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyons, W.M. Policy innovations of the US intermodal surface transportation efficiency act and clean air act amendments. Transportation 22, 217–240 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099471
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099471