Skip to main content
Log in

Weekly mobility of life cycle groups

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes parts of a study of travel by urban residents on seven consecutive days. The conceptual structure of the research understands travel as a demand derived by a dynamic process of individuals and households allocating their budgets to activities within the framework posed by societal regimens. Societal rules have a time dimension which is repetitive with a weekly cycle. Thus, distinctive basic patterns of weekly mobility are expected for segments of the society and differences in the obligation to adhere to those basic patterns. The data used for testing these hypotheses is described and the issue of increasing reporting bias over the diary period is addressed. Sixteen life cycle groups of persons are selected here for the presentation of some findings.

The profiles of trip rates for the groups over the seven days of the week (estimated with analysis of covariance) and the decomposition of the variances of trip rates into interindividual, intraindividual and systematic parts (by repeated measurement analysis) are reported. Characteristic differences in the volume of mobility, the shape of profiles and the variance components reflect different patterns of tripmaking for segments of the population over the week. It is concluded that even for well-defined person categories, interpersonal variety of mobility behavior is large but has to be seen in relation to even greater intrapersonal variability. Both components can best be understood within the period of one week which individuals use to organize their mobility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ben-Akiva ME & Lerman S (1985)Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hägerstrand T (1970) What about people in regional science:Papers and Proceeding of the Regional Science Association 24: 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burnett P & Hanson S (1982) The analysis of travel as an example of complex human behavior in spatially — constrained situations: definition and measurement issues.Transportation Research A: 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Damm D (1980) Interdependencies in activity behavior.Transportation Research Record 750. Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council (pp 33–40).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pas EI (1984) The effect of selected sociodemographic characteristics on daily travel-activity behavior.Environment and Planning A: 571–581.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hensher DA (1987) Introduction.Transportation Research A: 247–248.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kitamura R (1989) Guest editorial.Transportation 16: 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iida Y & Kitamura R (1990) Editorial.Transportation Research A: 399–400.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hirsh M, Prashker JN & Ben-Akiva ME (1986) Dynamic model of weekly activity pattern.Transportation Science 13: 24–36.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pas EI & Koppelman FS (1987) An examination of the determinants of day-to-day variability in individuals' urban travel behavior.Transportation 14: 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hanson S & Huff JO (1988) Systematic variability in repetitious travel.Transportation 15: 111–136.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pas EI (1988) Weekly travel-activity behavior.Transportation 15: 89–109.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sugie Y & Ashizawa T (1992) Characteristics of weekly travel patterns in a Japanese city. Paper presented at the 6th World Conference on Transport Research, Lyon, July 1992.

  14. Mannering FL (1989) Poisson analysis of commuter flexibility in changing routes and departure times.Transportation Research B: 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mahmassani HS (1989) Dynamic models of commuter behavior: Experimental investigation and application to the analysis of planned disruptions. Prepared for presentation at the International Conference on Dynamic Travel Behavior Analysis, Kyoto University, 1989.

  16. Kunert U (1992)Individuelles Verkehrsverhalten im Wochenverlauf. DIW-Beiträge zur Strukturforschung, No. 130. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Heidemann C (1981) Spatial behavior studies: concepts and contexts. In: Stopher PR, Meyburg AH & Brög W (Eds)New Horizons in Travel-Behavior Research. Lexington.

  18. Ministry of Transport (1977)The SIGMO Study—Part 1—Introduction and Summary. Den Haag.

  19. Golob TF & Meurs H (1986) Biases in response over time in a seven-day travel diary.Transportation 13: 163–181.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kunert U (1992) Weekly travel behavior of urban residents. Paper presented at the 6th World Conference on Transport Research, Lyon, July 1992.

  21. Zimmermann CA (1982) The life cycle concepts as a tool for travel research.Transportation 9: 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Winer BJ (1971)Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kunert, U. Weekly mobility of life cycle groups. Transportation 21, 271–288 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099214

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099214

Key words

Navigation