Abstract
Arguments are delivered against the proposition that choosing a qualitative or a quantitative research method is completely paradigmatically determined and that these methods cannot be justifiably triangulated or combined because of the incompatibility of their associated paradigms.
Social scientific paradigms (such as the empirical-analytical, interpretative and critical paradigms) do not appear logically compelling incompatible with respect to ontological or epistemological aspects as is often stated. In addition, paradigms and methods are mutually underdetermined. This is so. because the linkages of paradigms with methods are partly based on a kind of ‘Wahlverwandtschaft’ and because these linkages seem partly to be of a psychological and sociological nature.
Both paradigms and methods can be conceived as perspectives. Moreover, perspectivism does not necessarily imply a common (positivistic) reality, but may be conceived otherwise, for instance, as a pluralistic constructivism.
Besides paradigmatic and general methodological factors there is room for several pragmatic factors which influence the choice of a research method. This pragmatic room can be structured by eight dimensions, viz.: the researcher, the concrete object of study, the research situation, the research question, the research goal, relevant audiences, conditions and circumstances, and the time-dimension.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blaikie, N. W. H. (1991). A critique of the use of triangulation in social research.Quality and Quantity 25: 115–136.
Boer, Th. de (1980).Grondslagen van een kritische psychologie. Baarn: Ambo.
Bryman, A. (1988).Quantity and Quality in Social Research. London: Unwin Hyrnan.
Buss, A. R. (1979).A Dialectical Psychology. New York: Irvington Publishers.
Campbell, D. T. (1978). Qualitative knowing in action research. In: M. Brenner, P. Marsh & M. Brenner (eds.),The Social Contexts of Method. London: Croom Helm, pp. 184–209.
Campbell, D. T. (1979). Degrees of freedom and the case study. In: T. D. Cook and C. S. Reichardt (eds.),Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills/London: Sage, pp. 49–67.
Clark, P. A. (1972).Action Research. Organizational Change. London: Harper & Row.
Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist 30: 116–127.
Denzin (1978).The Research Act. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gifi, A. (1990).Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis. Chicester: Wiley.
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. L. (1967).The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.
Greene, J. C. (1987). Justifying conclusions in naturalistic evaluations. A practical perspective.Evaluation and Program Planning 10: 325–333.
Greene, J. C. & McClintock, C. (1985). Triangulation in evaluation: design and analysis issues.Evaluation Review 9, 523–545.
Groot, A. D. de (1982).Academie en forum. Meppel/Amsterdam: Boom.
Guba, E. G.(1990a). The alternative paradigm dialog. In: E. G. Guba (ed.), (1990b), q.v., pp. 17–27.
Guba, E. G. (ed.) (1990b).The Paradigm Dialog. Newbury Park: Sage.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry.Educational Communication and Technology — A Journal of Theory 30: 233–252.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. (1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? In: D. M. Fetterman (ed.),Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education. New York: Praeger, 89–115.
Habermas, J. (1965). Erkenntniss und Interesse.Merkur 213: 1139–1153.
Holzkamp, K. (1984).Kritische Psychologie und phänomenologische Psychologie. Der Weg der Kritische Psychologie zur Subjektwissenschaft. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 14 (AS 114).
Howe, K. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogma's die hard.Educational Researcher 17, 10–16.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970a). The structure of scientific revolutions.International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. Vol 2, 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970b). Reflections on my critics. In: I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (eds.),Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 231–278.
Kuhn, T. S. (1977).The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lincoln, Y. (1990). The making of a constructivist: a remembrance of transformations past. In: E. G. Guba (ed.), (1990b), q.v., pp. 67–87.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In D. D. Williams (ed.),Naturalistic Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Linschoten, J. (1962). Die Unumganglichkeit der Phänomenologie.Jahrbuch für Psychologie, Psychotherapie und medizinische Anthropologie 10: 177–185.
Maso, I. (1994). The excellent researcher. (Forthcoming in W. Harman (ed.))
Maso, I. & Smaling, A. (eds.) (1990).Objectiviteit in kwalitatief onderzoek. Meppel/Amsterdam: Boom.
Masterman, M. (1970). The nature of a paradigm. In: I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.),Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press, pp. 59–90.
Miedema, S. (1984). Kritische pedagogiek. In: F. Beugelsdijk and S. Miedema (eds.),Pedagogiek in meervoud. Wegen in het denken over opvoeding en onderwijs. Deventer: Van Loghurn Slaterus, pp. 105–152.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1984).Qualitative Data Analysis. A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills/London: Sage.
Moser, H. (1975).Aktionsforschung als kritische Theorie der Sozialwissenschaften. München: Kosel-Verlag.
Newell, A. & Simon, H. A. (1972).Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall.
Newton-Smith, W. H. (1981).The Rationality of Science. Boston/London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Nickles, Th. (ed.) (1980).Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. Dordrecht/Boston: Reidel.
Patton, M. (1988). Paradigms and pragmatism. In: D. M. Fetterman (ed.),Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education. New York: Preager, 116–137.
Quine, W. V. O. (1970). On the reasons for the indeterminacy of translation.Journal of Philosophy 67: 178–183.
Quine, W. V. O. (1975) On empirically equivalent systems of the world.Erkenntnis 9: 313–328.
Reichardt, C. S. & Cook, Th. D. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods, in: Th. D. Cook & C. S. Reichardt (eds.),Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Beverly Hills/London: Sage, 7–32.
Riegel, K. E. (1979).Foundations of Dialectical Psychology. New York: Academic Press.
Rorty, R. (1982). Method, social science, and social hope, in: R. Rorty,Consequences of Pragmatism. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 191–210.
Schneider, U. (1980).Sozialwissenschaftliche Methodenkrise und Handlungsforschung. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.
Smaling, A. (1987).Methodologische objectiviteit en kwalitatief onderzoek. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Smaling, A. (1990) Münchhausen-objectivity: a bootstrap-conception of objectivity as a methodological norm, in: W. J. Baker, R. van Hezewijk, M. Hyland, and S. Terwee (eds.),Recent Trends in Theoretical Psychology, Vol. II, New York: Springer-Verlag, 155–165.
Smaling, A. (1992a). Varieties of methodological intersubjectivity; the relations with qualitative and quantitative research, and with objectivity.Quality and Quantity 26: 169–180.
Smaling, A. (1992b). Objectiviteit, betrouwbaarheid en validiteit. In: G. J. N. de Bruyn & M. A. Zwanenburg (eds.),Methodologie voor bestuurskundigen. Muiderberg: Coutinho, 299–322.
Smaling, A. (1992c). Review: Paul E. Meehl. Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. (Psychological Reports, 1-V66, 1990, 195–244.)Psychometrika 57: 451–454.
Smith, J. K. & Heshusius, L. (1986). Closing down the conservation: the end of the quantitative-qualitative debate among educational inquirers.Educational Researcher 15, 4–12.
Strien, P. J. van (1990). Recontextualization as a contribution of history to theoretical psychology. In: W. J. Baker, M. E. Hyland, R. van Hezewijk, & S. Terwee (eds.),Recent Trends in Theoretical Psychology. Vol. II. New York: Springer-Verlag, 305–316.
Suppe, F. (1977)The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana/Chicago/London: University of Illinois Press.
Walker, R. C. S. (1989).The Coherence Theory of Truth. Realism Anti-Realism Idealism. London/New York: Routledge.
Weber, M. (1922).Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smaling, A. The pragmatic dimension. Qual Quant 28, 233–249 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098942
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098942