Transportation

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 359–381 | Cite as

Using the revenues from congestion pricing

  • Kenneth A. Small
Article

Abstract

The economic theory behind congestion pricing relies on using the revenues to help compensate highway users. But can practical methods of using revenues come close to achieving this compensation, and still have salient appeal to important political groups? This paper investigates the possibilities for designing a package of revenue uses that can achieve these twin goals. The suggested approach returns two-thirds of the revenues to travelers through travel allowances and tax reductions, and uses the rest to improve transportation throughout the area, including affected business centers. By replacing regressive sales and fuel taxes, this approach offsets the tendency of the prices alone to have a regressive distributional impact. By lowering taxes, funding new highways, improving transit, and upgrading business centers, the package provides inducements for support from several key interest groups. The potential amounts of money involved are discussed using nationwide data, and in more detail using a case study of ubiquitous facility pricing throughout the Los Angeles region. Illustrative calculations of the effects on various individuals confirm that such a package can create net benefits for a wide spectrum of people and interest groups.

Key words

congestion pricing distributional impacts road pricing user charges 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bay Area Economic Forum (1990)Market Based Solutions to the Transportation Crisis. San Francisco: Bay Area Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  2. Brownstone D & Golob TF (1992) The effectiveness of ridesharing incentives: discrete-choice models of commuting in Southern California.Regional Science and Urban Economics 22: 5–24.Google Scholar
  3. Burtraw D (1991) Compensating losers when cost-effective environmental policies are adopted.Resources 104: 1–5. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron M (1991)Transportation Efficiency: Tackling Southern California's Air Pollution and Congestion. Oakland, California: Environmental Defense Fund.Google Scholar
  5. Giuliano G & Small KA (1991) Subcenters in the Los Angeles region.Regional Science and Urban Economics 21: 163–182.Google Scholar
  6. Gomez-Ibanez JA (1992) The political economy of highway tolls and congestion pricing. In:Exploring the Role of Pricing as a Congestion Management Tool: Summary of Proceedings of the Seminar on the Application of Pricing Principles to Congestion Management (pp. 5–9).Searching for Solutions: A Policy Discussion Series, No. 1. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Federal Highway Administration.Google Scholar
  7. Gomez-Ibanez JA & Meyer JR (1991)Private Toll Roads in the United States: The Early Experience of Virginia and California.Final Report to the U.S. Department of Transportation. Cambridge, Mass.: Taubman Center for State and Local Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  8. Goodwin PB (1990) How to make road pricing popular.Economic Affairs 10, June/July: 6–7.Google Scholar
  9. Hanks JW Jr. & Lomax TJ (1990)Roadway Congestion in Major Urbanized Areas: 1982 to 1988. College Station, Texas: Texas Transportation Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Hau TD (1992) Congestion charging mechanisms: An evaluation of current practice. Preliminary draft, Transport Division, The World Bank (March).Google Scholar
  11. Jones P (1991) Gaining public support for road pricing through a package approach.Traffic Engineering and Control 32: 194–196.Google Scholar
  12. Jorgenson DW, Slesnick DT & Wilcoxen PJ (1992) Carbon taxes and economic welfare.Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics: 393–454. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  13. Keeler TE & Small KA (1977) Optimal peak-load pricing, investment, and service levels on urban expressways.Journal of Political Economy 85: 1–25.Google Scholar
  14. MVA Consultancy, Institute for Transport Studies of the University of Leeds, & Transportation Studies Unit of the University of Oxford (1987)The Value of Travel Time Savings. Newbury, England: Policy Journals.Google Scholar
  15. Nordhaus WD (1991) To slow or not to slow: The economics of the greenhouse effect.The Economic Journal 101: 920–937.Google Scholar
  16. Poole RW Jr. (1992) Introducing congestion pricing on a new toll road.Transportation, 19(4): 383–396 (this issue).Google Scholar
  17. Shoup, DC (1982) Cashing out free parking.Transportation Quarterly 36: 351–364.Google Scholar
  18. Small KA (1992)Urban Transportation Economics. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Small KA, Winston C & Evans CA (1989)Road Work: A New Highway Pricing and Investment Policy. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  20. U.S. Federal Highway Administration (USFHWA 1982)Final Report on the Federal Highway Cost Allocation Study. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  21. U.S. Federal Highway Administration (USFHWA 1990)Highway Statistics 1990. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  22. Viton PA (1991) Private roads. Unpublished manuscript, Department of City and Regional Planning, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth A. Small
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations