, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 335–358 | Cite as

An assessment of the political acceptability of congestion pricing

  • Genevieve Giuliano


There is renewed interest in implementing congestion pricing in metropolitan areas throughout the US. This paper reviews changes in the transportation policy environment that have led to this renewed interest and identifies the major interest groups that support congestion pricing. A case study is used to demonstrate that significant barriers to congestion pricing implementation continue to exist. The paper concludes with some suggestions for developing politically acceptable pricing alternatives.

Key words

congestion pricing public policy implementation Los Angeles 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altshuler A, Womack J & Pucher J (1981)The Urban Transportation System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bhatt K (1991) Congestion pricing of urban street network in Los Angeles Region. Paper presented at the University of California Transportation Center Conference on Congestion Pricing, San Diego CA.Google Scholar
  3. Borins S (1988) Electronic road pricing: An idea whose time may never come.Transportation Research A, 22A(1): 37–44.Google Scholar
  4. Button K (1984) Road pricing — An outsider's view of American experiences.Transport Review 4: 73–98.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron M (1991)Transportation Efficiency: Tackling Southern California's Air Pollution and Congestion. Los Angeles, CA: Environmental Defense Fund and Regional Institute of Southern California.Google Scholar
  6. Cervero R (1989)America's Suburban Centers: The Land Use — Transportation Link. Boston MA: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  7. Cervero R, Wachs M, Berlin R & Gephart R (1980)Efficiency and Equity Implication of Alternate Transit Fare Policies. Report DOT-CA-11-0019. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen Y (1987) Commuter welfare under peak period congestion tolls: Who gains and who loses?International Journal of Transport Economies XIV(3): 239–266.Google Scholar
  9. Dunn J (1981)Miles to Go: European and American Transportation Policies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Elliot W (1986) Fumbling toward the edge of history: California's quest for a road pricing experiment.Transportation Research A 20A(2): 151–156.Google Scholar
  11. Else P (1986) No entry for congestion taxes?Transportation Research A 20A(2): 99–107.Google Scholar
  12. Fisher R & Simkowitz H (1978) Priority treatment for high occupancy vehicles in the United States: A review of recent and forthcoming projects. Final Report No. UMTA-MA-0049-78-11. Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.Google Scholar
  13. Foster C (1974) The regressiveness of road pricing.International Journal of Transport Economies 1: 133–141.Google Scholar
  14. Giuliano G & Wachs M (1992) Transportation demand management as part of growth management. In: Stein J (ed)Growth Management: The Planning Challenge of the 1990's. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Giuliano G, Hwang K & Wachs M (1992) Mandatory trip reduction in Southern California: First year results.Transportation Research A (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  16. Giuliano G (1992) Transportation demand management and urban traffic congestion: Promise or panacea?Journal of the American Planning Association 58(3): 327–335.Google Scholar
  17. Giuliano G, Levine D & Teal R (1990) Impact of high occupancy vehicle lanes on carpooling behavior.Transportation 17: 159–177.Google Scholar
  18. Gomez-Ibanez JA (1992) The political economy of highway tolls and congestion pricing. In: Exploring the Role of Pricing as a Congestion Management Tool: Summary of Proceedings of the Seminar on the Application of Pricing Principles to Congestion Management (pp. 5–9). Searching for Solutions: A Policy Discussion Series, No. 1. Washington DC: U.S. Federal Highway Admnistration.Google Scholar
  19. Hanks J & Lomax T (1991) Roadway congestion in major urban areas: 1982–1988.Transportation Research Record No. 1305: 177–189.Google Scholar
  20. Harvey G (1991) The suitability of Bay Area toll bridges for a congestion pricing experiment. Paper presented at the University of California Transportation Center Conference on Congestion Pricing, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Hau T (1992)Congestion Charging Mechanisms: An Evaluation of Current Practice. Washington DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  22. Higgins T (1986) Road-pricing attempts in the United States.Transportation Research A 20A(2): 145–150.Google Scholar
  23. Higgins T (1979) Roadpricing — Should and might it happen?Transportation 8: 99–113.Google Scholar
  24. Hu P & J Young (1992)Summary of Travel Trends: 1990 National Personal Transportation Study. Report FHWA-PL-92-027. Washington DC: Federal Highway Administration.Google Scholar
  25. Jones P & Harvey S (1991) Urban road pricing: Dealing with the issue of public acceptability — A U.K. perspective. Working Paper TSU669, Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  26. Jones P (1991) Assessing traveler responses to urban road pricing. Working Paper TSU677, Transport Studies Unit, University of Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  27. Kirby R (1991) Implementation issues — The local government view. Presented at the Seminar on the Application of Pricing Principles to Congestion Management, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  28. Linneman P & Summers A (1991) Patterns and processes of employment and population decentralization in the U.S., 1970–1987. Paper presented at the Regional Science Association North American Meeting, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  29. May AD (1992) Road pricing: An international perspective.Transportation 19(4): 313–333 (this issue).Google Scholar
  30. McShane M, Koshi M & Lundin O (1984) Public policy toward the automobile: A comparative look at Japan and Sweden.Transportation Research A 18A(2): 97–109.Google Scholar
  31. Morrison S (1986) A survey of road pricing.Transportation Research A 20A(2): 87–96.Google Scholar
  32. Newman P & Kenworthy J (1988) The transport-energy trade-off: Fuel efficient traffic vs fuel efficient cities.Transportation Research A 27A(3): 163–174.Google Scholar
  33. Orange County Transit District (1985)Commuter Market Study. Garden Grove, CA: Orange County Transit District.Google Scholar
  34. Poole R (1992) Introducing congestion pricing on a new toll road.Transportation 19(4): 383–396 (this issue).Google Scholar
  35. Pucher J (1981) Equity in transit finance: Distribution of transit subsidy benefit and costs among income classes.Journal of the American Planning Association 47: 387–407.Google Scholar
  36. Pucher J (1988) Urban travel behavior as the outcome of public policy.Journal of the American Planning Association, Summer: 509–519.Google Scholar
  37. Reinhardt W (1990) Congestion pricing is coming: The question is where and when.Public Works Financing, June: 7–14.Google Scholar
  38. Richardson HW (1974) A note on the distributional effects of road pricing.Journal of Transport Economics and Policy VIII(1): 82–85.Google Scholar
  39. Richardson H & Gordon P (1989) Counting nonwork trips: The missing link in transportation, land use and urban policy.Urban Land, September: 6–18.Google Scholar
  40. Rock S (1990) Equity of local option taxes.Transportation 44(3): 405–418.Google Scholar
  41. Siracusa A (1991) Implementation issues — The business view. Presented at the Seminar on the Application of Pricing Principles to Congestion Management, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  42. Small K (1983) The incidence of congestion tolls on urban highways.Journal of Urban Economics 13:90–111.Google Scholar
  43. Small K (1992)Urban Transportation Economics. Philadelphia, PA: Harwood Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Small K (1992) Using the revenues from congestion pricing.Transportation, 19(4): 359–381 (this issue).Google Scholar
  45. Small K, Winston C, Evans C (1989)Road Work. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  46. South Coast Air Quality Management District (1988)Air Quality Management Plan. Los Angeles, CA: South Coast Air Quality Management District and Southern California Association of Governments.Google Scholar
  47. Southern California Association of Governments (1987)Cost of Congestion. SCAG Economic Development Program, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  48. Southern California Association of Government (1988)Regional Mobility Plan. Los Angeles, CA: Southern California Association of Governments.Google Scholar
  49. The Urban Institute/KT Analytics (1991)Congestion Pricing Study. Final Report. Los Angeles, CA: Southern California Association of Governments.Google Scholar
  50. U.S. Department of Commerce (1991)County Business Patterns: 1989 California. Washington, D.C.: Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
  51. U.S. General Accounting Office (1989) Traffic congestion: Trends, measures and effects. GAO/PEMD-90-1. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  52. Vickrey W (1955) Some implications of marginal cost pricing for public utilities.American Economic Review 45: 605–620.Google Scholar
  53. Wachs M (1990) Regulating traffic by controlling land use: The Southern California experience.Transportation 9(1 & 2): 241–256.Google Scholar
  54. Wachs M (1989) U.S. transit subsidy policy: In need of reform.Science 244: 1545–1549.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Genevieve Giuliano
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations