Skip to main content
Log in

Agricultural districts and farmland prices

  • Published:
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A hedonic price equation of structureless farmland prices in New York State are fitted to 458 land transactions between 1982–1985. No capitalization is found of the state's Agricultural District farmland preservation program, which combines current-use property taxation with several development-inhibiting features. It is hypothesized that landowners avoid joining the program when it would threaten profits from a development sale, and that those who do participate gain little because agriculture is the highest value use of their land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, John E. and Howard C. Bunch. (1989). “Agricultural Property Tax Relief,”Land Economics 65 (February), 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentick, Brian L., and Thomas F. Pogue. (1988). “Development Timing and Property Taxes,”Land Economics 64 (November), 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bills, Nelson. (1988). “Farmland Use In An Urban Environment: Status, Trends and Policy Issues.” InOur Disappearing Farmland, op. cit., 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, William R., and Howard E. Conklin. (1975). “New Farmland Preservation Programs in New York,”Journal of the American Institute of Planners 41 (November), 390–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, Peter F., and C.F. Sirmans. (1978). “Area, Time, Centrality and the Value of Urban Land,”Land Economics 54 (November), 514–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, William A. (1982). “The Urbanization of Agricultural Land: A Review of the National Agricultural Lands Study,”Land Economics 58 (May), 236–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Ken. (1988). “Introduction to Farmland Preservation Issues: Exploration of Existing Programs and Alternative Options.” InOur Disappearing Farmland, Glenmont, New York: New York Farm Bureau. Proceedings of the Farmland Preservation Conference (July 28,1988), 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henneberry, David M., and Richard L. Barrows. (1988). “Capitalization of Agricultural Zoning into Farmland Prices,”Land Economics 66 (August), 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, Richard F. (1961). “Economic Change and Rural-Urban Land Conversions,”Econometrica 29 (January), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State, Division of Equalization and Assessment, Agricultural Unit. (1989). Albany, N.Y., Agricultural Market Data Collection Manual and data diskettes.

  • New York State, Office of the Comptroller.Special Report on Municipal Affairs, Reports Nos. 92–97, 1980 through 1985. Albany, New York.

  • Pindyck, Robert S. and Rubinfeld, Daniel L. (1991).Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonkwiler, J.S., and J.E. Reynolds. (1986). “Hedonic Price Models in the Analysis of Land Prices at the Urban Fringe,”Land Economics 62 (February), 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vitaliano, D.F., Hill, C. Agricultural districts and farmland prices. J Real Estate Finan Econ 8, 213–223 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01096992

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01096992

Key words

Navigation