Skip to main content
Log in

The ‘ultimate objective’ of the framework convention on climate change requires a new approach in climate change research

An Editorial

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the Framework Convention on Climate Change an ‘ultimate objective’ is formulated that calls for stabilization of the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at a level that would allow ecosystems to adapt naturally, safeguard food supply and enable sustainable development to proceed in a sustainable manner. This paper addresses the possible contribution of science to translate this rather vague and ambiguous objective into more practicable terms. We propose a regionalized, risk-based six-step approach that couples an analysis of ecosystem vulnerability to the results of simulations of climate change. An ‘ultimate objective’ level could be determined in terms of stabilized concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The level and timing of this stabilization would be determined by a political appreciation of associated risks for managed and unmanaged ecosystems. These risks would be assessed by region in an internationally coordinated scientific effort, followed by a global synthesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • De Groot, R.: 1992,Functions of Nature, Wolters-Noordhoff.

  • Jäger, J.: 1988, ‘Developing Policies for Responding to Climate Change’, TD No. 225, WMO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, J. and Reiling, R.: 1993, ‘A Multi-Stress Model for Vegetation (MOVE): Tool for Scenario Studies and Standard Setting’,The Science of the Total Environment (pp. 1513-1526).

  • Leemans, R., Pernetta, J. B. and Elder, D. (eds.): 1994, ‘Impacts of Climate Change on Ecosystems and Species’, IUCN (in press).

  • Rijsberman, F. and Swart, R. J. (eds.): 1990, ‘Targets and Indicators of Climate Change’, Stockholm Environment Institute.

  • Sassin, W.: 1990, ‘Sensitivity versus Stability Approach’, in Rijsberman, F. and Swart, R. J. (eds.):Targets and Indicators of Climate Change, Stockholm Environment Institute, pp. 28-39.

  • Krause, F.: 1989,Energy Policy in the Greenhouse, IPSEP.

  • Swart, R. J., de Boois, H. and Rotmans, J.: 1989, ‘Targeting Climate Change’,International Environmental Affairs 1, no. 3, pp. 222–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations General Assembly: 1992, ‘Framework Convention for Climate Change’, United Nations, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellinga, P. and Swart, R. J.: 1991, ‘The Greenhouse Marathon’, in Jäger, J. and Ferguson, H. L. (eds.):Climate Change: Science, Impacts and Policy, Cambridge University Press, pp. 129-134.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Swart, R.J., Vellinga, P. The ‘ultimate objective’ of the framework convention on climate change requires a new approach in climate change research. Climatic Change 26, 343–349 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01094401

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01094401

Keywords

Navigation